H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Fabrice Santoro vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 2-6

Cedric Pioline holds a 6–2 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 5–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 1999 Hamburg Masters second round 3-6 6-2 6-3.

FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 6
8 main draw meetings
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 5, 1999* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Fabrice Santoro #43 3-6 6-2 6-3 Cedric Pioline #28 Match data
Apr 26, 1998* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Cedric Pioline #16 1-6 6-2 6-4 Fabrice Santoro #25 Match data
Jul 10, 1997* Gstaad ATP 250 R32 Clay Cedric Pioline #23 3-6 6-2 7-6(7) Fabrice Santoro #55 Match data
Sep 18, 1992* Bordeaux ATP 250 R16 Clay Cedric Pioline #57 6-3 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #32 Match data
Sep 14, 1991* Bordeaux ATP 250 QF Hard Cedric Pioline #68 6-3 3-6 6-4 Fabrice Santoro #37 Match data
Aug 12, 1991 Indianapolis ATP 250 R32 Hard Fabrice Santoro #40 6-4 5-7 6-2 Cedric Pioline #68 Match data
Jun 21, 1991* Genova ATP 250 R16 Clay Cedric Pioline #92 6-4 6-1 Fabrice Santoro #39 Match data
Apr 18, 1991* Nice ATP 250 R32 Clay Cedric Pioline #131 3-6 6-4 6-4 Fabrice Santoro #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fabrice Santoro Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5
34 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6