H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Fabrice Santoro vs David Rikl H2H: 1-1
Fabrice Santoro and David Rikl are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 1995 Montevideo third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1995* | Montevideo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Fabrice Santoro | 6-2 6-4 | David Rikl | Match data |
| Oct 28, 1993* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Rikl | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | Fabrice Santoro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabrice Santoro | #142 | #17 | 1,516 | 1,889 | 456 | 432 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| David Rikl | #852 | #41 | 809 | 1,685 | 53 | 92 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fabrice Santoro | David Rikl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #43 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #46 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #151 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #102 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #95 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #80 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #29 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #83 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #150 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #173 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #31 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #868 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #52 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #58 | 1,782 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,785 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2008 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #52 | 1,755 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2009 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,694 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,688 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |