H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Fabrice Santoro vs David Skoch H2H: 1-1
Fabrice Santoro and David Skoch are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Skoch leads 1–0 on clay, while Fabrice Santoro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 2007 Chennai third round 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2007* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Fabrice Santoro | 3-0 (ret.) | David Skoch | Match data |
| Aug 5, 1993* | Prague | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Skoch | 7-5 7-5 | Fabrice Santoro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabrice Santoro | #142 | #17 | 1,516 | 1,889 | 456 | 432 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| David Skoch | #1,111 | #133 | 331 | 1,543 | 5 | 12 | 29.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fabrice Santoro | David Skoch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #478 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #43 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #244 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #278 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #46 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #102 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #29 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #31 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #730 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1127 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2004 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #52 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1143 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #58 | 1,782 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,785 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2008 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #52 | 1,755 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2009 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,694 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,688 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |