H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Fabrice Santoro vs Guillaume Raoux H2H: 5-0

Fabrice Santoro holds a 5–0 lead over Guillaume Raoux in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Fabrice Santoro leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 1999 Australian Open round of 64 6-4 1-6 6-2 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Guillaume Raoux
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fabrice Santoro #68 6-4 1-6 6-2 4-6 6-3 Guillaume Raoux #51 Match data Jan 22, 1999* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Fabrice Santoro #42 6-1 6-1 Guillaume Raoux #90 Match data Jan 15, 1993* R16 Jakarta ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Fabrice Santoro #43 6-4 6-2 Guillaume Raoux #93 Match data Jan 8, 1993* R16 Kuala Lumpur (1) ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Fabrice Santoro #53 2-6 6-2 7-6(5) Guillaume Raoux #91 Match data Mar 16, 1991* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Fabrice Santoro #87 6-1 6-4 6-4 Guillaume Raoux #184 Match data May 30, 1990* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,890 462 435 51.5% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Guillaume Raoux #1,033 #35 1,041 1,808 175 223 44.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fabrice Santoro Guillaume Raoux
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #448 1,493 0 0
19 1992 28–23 54.9% #43 1,748 0 0 1989 1–6 14.3% #220 1,462 0 0
20 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,631 0 0 1990 6–9 40.0% #84 1,529 0 0
21 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,736 0 0 1991 14–25 35.9% #104 1,616 0 0
22 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,610 0 0 1992 14–16 46.7% #93 1,619 0 1
23 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,558 0 0 1993 27–28 49.1% #85 1,627 0 1
24 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,803 0 1 1994 15–20 42.9% #115 1,573 0 1
25 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,708 0 1 1995 17–22 43.6% #77 1,567 0 1
26 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2 1996 21–22 48.8% #72 1,621 0 1
27 2000 34–27 55.7% #31 1,739 0 3 1997 26–26 50.0% #47 1,728 0 1
28 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3 1998 24–27 47.1% #53 1,735 0 1
29 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,740 0 4 1999 10–19 34.5% #137 1,578 0 1
30 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4 2000 0–2 0.0% #668 1,553 0 1
31 2004 18–15 54.5% #52 1,815 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,781 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,701 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,788 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,696 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,689 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fabrice Santoro Guillaume Raoux
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1989 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 13 10 23 56.5% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 21 13 34 61.8% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1989 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1994 12 9 21 57.1% 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 4 16 20 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 5 13 61.5%
22 1995 3 7 10 30.0% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1992 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1996 1 4 5 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1993 14 14 28 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0%
24 1997 9 6 15 60.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
25 1998 14 15 29 48.3% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1995 8 9 17 47.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
26 1999 22 12 34 64.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 1996 10 12 22 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
27 2000 22 16 38 57.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1997 12 14 26 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5%
28 2001 20 15 35 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1998 16 13 29 55.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
29 2002 22 14 36 61.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
30 2003 11 11 22 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2004 13 11 24 54.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 10 9 19 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 9 13 22 40.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 15 12 27 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 11 10 21 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 246 213 459 53.6% 128 136 264 48.5% 44 33 77 57.1% 44 53 97 45.4% — 94 112 206 45.6% 14 36 50 28.0% 21 27 48 43.8% 46 48 94 48.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 766/857 of Fabrice Santoro's and 339/375 of Guillaume Raoux's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fabrice Santoro Guillaume Raoux
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1991 43/47 1.3 2.4 59.8% 64.2% 47.7% 57.1% 45.6% 57.5% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 41/51 1.9 3.2 58.7% 63.0% 51.9% 51.4% 47.1% 58.2% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 46/50 1.3 2.7 61.4% 64.0% 51.2% 51.1% 47.6% 58.6% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 36/42 2.5 3.1 61.1% 66.0% 51.6% 64.6% 42.4% 60.0% 42.5% 1991 37/39 5.7 3.5 51.1% 72.6% 48.3% 53.7% 42.7% 60.7% 36.1%
22 1995 39/41 2.0 3.4 61.1% 62.4% 48.9% 54.4% 37.3% 57.2% 39.6% 1992 28/30 4.3 3.3 52.5% 71.6% 50.9% 61.6% 49.3% 61.8% 37.9%
23 1996 13/18 1.6 3.2 53.2% 61.7% 49.9% 50.7% 47.8% 56.1% 36.9% 1993 48/55 4.8 2.9 51.0% 74.0% 52.3% 58.5% 44.4% 63.1% 39.3%
24 1997 48/55 3.4 2.1 50.9% 70.6% 54.1% 56.5% 43.0% 62.5% 40.7% 1994 34/35 4.2 3.2 52.9% 72.1% 48.9% 54.2% 36.7% 61.2% 36.4%
25 1998 42/54 3.0 2.0 54.4% 67.3% 51.7% 57.4% 43.3% 60.1% 40.6% 1995 38/39 5.1 2.9 50.3% 72.5% 50.6% 58.8% 45.0% 61.8% 35.5%
26 1999 51/61 3.1 2.4 58.3% 67.4% 50.4% 61.7% 41.5% 60.2% 38.7% 1996 36/43 6.3 2.9 51.8% 75.4% 53.5% 59.8% 46.9% 65.0% 35.4%
27 2000 51/61 3.2 2.6 55.4% 68.5% 52.3% 55.2% 44.2% 61.1% 39.0% 1997 45/52 5.2 2.7 55.6% 74.8% 53.4% 55.0% 38.6% 65.6% 35.4%
28 2001 51/61 2.8 1.7 57.0% 66.1% 51.9% 62.8% 47.5% 60.0% 39.2% 1998 45/51 3.7 2.4 55.7% 70.5% 53.7% 63.3% 39.9% 63.2% 33.6%
29 2002 43/52 3.9 2.7 56.0% 69.4% 53.4% 54.4% 42.1% 62.2% 40.2% 1999 26/29 4.9 3.7 50.3% 70.5% 53.1% 61.5% 36.8% 61.8% 32.0%
30 2003 38/38 2.9 2.2 59.9% 67.0% 49.7% 47.3% 39.7% 59.9% 39.2% 2000 2/2 5.5 2.5 51.7% 70.6% 55.9% 75.0% 21.6% 63.6% 35.1%
31 2004 31/33 4.2 1.8 56.0% 69.3% 51.0% 56.2% 37.7% 61.0% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 37/37 3.4 1.4 58.5% 64.7% 51.6% 59.6% 36.9% 59.4% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 42/42 4.3 2.6 58.4% 68.0% 48.9% 56.2% 46.1% 60.0% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 43/43 5.0 1.5 55.7% 72.3% 54.2% 57.1% 45.6% 64.1% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 35/35 3.5 1.3 57.5% 69.5% 53.5% 57.8% 41.1% 62.7% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2009 35/35 4.8 1.9 56.6% 69.3% 49.5% 56.5% 41.4% 60.9% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2010 1/1 0.0 1.0 60.2% 66.2% 48.8% 70.6% 50.0% 59.3% 30.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 766/897 3.1 2.3 57.4% 67.1% 51.3% 56.5% 43.2% 60.3% 39.7% — 339/398 4.9 3.0 52.5% 72.8% 51.8% 58.5% 42.1% 62.9% 35.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fabrice Santoro Guillaume Raoux
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1989 1509 117.4 — — — — +25 +18 — 37.5% -0.75 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 103.0 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 1685 143.3 — — — — -18 -64 — 53.2% -0.15 2–7 (22%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1698 140.2 -2.94 +4.41 1.033 50.6% -23 +17 — 55.5% +0.39 8–9 (47%) 7–4 (64%) 101.6 -0.38 1988 1493 101.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — 0–1 — -0.12
19 1992 1748 143.8 -2.09 +2.77 1.007 50.2% -63 +37 — 53.7% +0.24 7–6 (54%) 13–6 (68%) 108.5 -1.57 1989 1463 110.5 — — — — +66 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–1 0–2 — -0.21
20 1993 1632 140.6 -2.07 +2.75 0.993 49.9% +48 +70 — 46.7% -0.12 9–7 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.03 1990 1530 117.3 — — — — +46 — +38 45.0% -0.22 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 98.6 +0.60
21 1994 1737 139.2 -1.00 +3.08 1.062 51.3% -5 +10 — 56.3% +0.29 9–9 (50%) 8–4 (67%) 101.6 -0.43 1991 1617 126.4 +0.36 -2.95 0.919 48.7% -14 — -57 38.5% -0.57 6–7 (46%) 4–8 (33%) 100.3 -0.55
22 1995 1611 128.7 -2.75 +0.77 0.927 48.4% -29 +106 — 43.8% -0.57 6–11 (35%) 3–8 (27%) 90.8 +0.74 1992 1620 126.0 -0.28 +0.33 0.993 50.1% 0 — -46 48.6% +0.11 2–6 (25%) 1–8 (11%) 91.6 +1.27
23 1996 1558 113.5 -2.78 -1.32 0.840 46.7% -8 +78 — 35.9% -1.13 2–2 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 97.8 +0.36 1993 1628 138.5 +1.31 +1.04 1.066 51.2% +27 -183 -16 51.8% +0.17 5–13 (28%) 7–7 (50%) 95.9 -0.69
24 1997 1804 152.5 +0.69 +3.16 1.085 51.3% -35 -44 — 56.1% +0.33 11–9 (55%) 11–3 (79%) 111.3 -2.98 1994 1573 130.1 -0.73 -1.57 0.936 48.9% +66 -127 +7 43.7% -0.43 4–4 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 102.8 +0.24
25 1998 1709 143.8 -1.02 +2.20 1.017 50.4% -3 +74 — 50.7% -0.05 10–12 (45%) 8–5 (62%) 98.4 -0.42 1995 1567 120.6 -0.21 -2.56 0.930 48.9% +49 -88 -28 44.2% -0.47 7–6 (54%) 9–7 (56%) 103.6 +1.91
26 1999 1766 144.6 -1.34 +1.00 0.973 49.6% +38 -13 -220 56.4% +0.23 10–5 (67%) 13–8 (62%) 106.5 +1.38 1996 1621 132.1 +2.42 -1.48 1.013 50.4% +23 -150 -47 50.0% +0.10 6–8 (43%) 14–11 (56%) 104.5 -0.30
27 2000 1740 141.2 -0.34 +2.05 1.004 50.0% +13 +19 -204 51.0% -0.11 13–8 (62%) 10–12 (45%) 101.1 -0.61 1997 1729 142.3 +2.81 -1.42 1.030 50.7% -9 -216 -38 54.5% +0.22 4–7 (36%) 17–8 (68%) 106.2 -0.78
28 2001 1769 141.9 -1.14 +1.52 0.980 49.9% -19 +17 -124 56.3% +0.07 9–7 (56%) 10–6 (63%) 106.1 -0.40 1998 1736 144.0 +1.79 -2.65 0.911 48.6% +35 -207 -109 50.4% -0.25 7–10 (41%) 23–9 (72%) 104.5 -2.53
29 2002 1740 141.0 -0.22 +2.22 1.064 51.1% +48 -51 -125 51.5% +0.12 10–12 (45%) 12–11 (52%) 95.5 +1.01 1999 1578 127.4 +0.36 -4.10 0.838 47.6% +71 — — 38.9% -0.83 2–5 (29%) 7–7 (50%) 93.4 +0.04
30 2003 1709 127.8 -1.70 +2.05 0.978 49.4% +20 -96 -93 45.7% -0.26 9–10 (47%) 2–6 (25%) 95.6 -0.35 2000 1554 113.4 -1.28 -1.62 0.966 48.4% — — — 28.6% -1.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.02
31 2004 1816 137.3 -1.06 +1.68 0.997 49.9% -21 -159 — 50.0% +0.07 5–3 (63%) 3–5 (38%) 101.9 -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 1781 146.7 -1.92 +3.04 0.990 49.9% +42 -184 -142 50.0% +0.01 6–5 (55%) 6–8 (43%) 100.4 -2.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1702 141.3 -1.28 +1.44 0.957 49.5% +11 -128 +3 48.2% -0.10 4–9 (31%) 7–8 (47%) 94.8 -2.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 1788 144.1 +1.04 +2.02 1.074 51.2% -11 — +11 55.1% +0.11 6–9 (40%) 12–5 (71%) 103.1 -1.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 1758 141.9 -0.13 +0.94 0.995 50.0% +37 -208 +68 49.4% -0.26 3–2 (60%) 9–6 (60%) 103.6 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2009 1696 134.7 -1.83 -0.14 0.922 48.5% -3 -186 +180 42.9% -0.27 6–6 (50%) 4–9 (31%) 95.4 -1.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2010 1690 110.3 +0.81 +1.44 0.747 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.33 — — — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1890 147.6 -1.17 +2.02 1.000 50.0% +6 +5 -36 51.0% -0.01 147–150 (49%) 155–133 (54%) 103.9 -1.65 — 1808 138.0 +0.99 -1.61 0.965 49.6% +27 -165 -34 46.7% -0.22 45–72 (38%) 92–82 (53%) 100.7 -0.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.