H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Fabrice Santoro vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 2-2

Fabrice Santoro and Hicham Arazi are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Hicham Arazi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 2001 Paris Masters round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Hicham Arazi
MAR Age 52 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hicham Arazi #31 6-4 6-4 Fabrice Santoro #19 Match data Nov 1, 2001* R32 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet
Fabrice Santoro #34 6-4 6-2 Hicham Arazi #27 Match data Feb 25, 2000* R16 London ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Fabrice Santoro #40 4-6 6-4 6-1 Hicham Arazi #36 Match data Nov 4, 1998* R64 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet
Hicham Arazi #148 6-2 7-6(5) Fabrice Santoro #97 Match data Mar 28, 1996* R32 Casablanca World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,890 462 435 51.5% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Hicham Arazi #793 #22 1,240 1,864 202 215 48.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fabrice Santoro Hicham Arazi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1992 28–23 54.9% #43 1,748 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,631 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #184 1,486 0 0
21 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,736 0 0 1995 1–5 16.7% #141 1,457 0 0
22 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,610 0 0 1996 12–17 41.4% #79 1,546 0 0
23 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,558 0 0 1997 28–27 50.9% #38 1,624 0 1
24 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,803 0 1 1998 23–28 45.1% #36 1,715 0 1
25 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,708 0 1 1999 27–27 50.0% #36 1,702 0 1
26 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2 2000 31–26 54.4% #30 1,775 0 1
27 2000 34–27 55.7% #31 1,739 0 3 2001 30–23 56.6% #25 1,833 0 1
28 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3 2002 14–21 40.0% #90 1,699 0 1
29 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,740 0 4 2003 21–20 51.2% #52 1,718 0 1
30 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4 2004 15–18 45.5% #62 1,701 0 1
31 2004 18–15 54.5% #52 1,815 0 4 2005 0–2 0.0% #897 1,664 0 1
32 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,781 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,701 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,788 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,696 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,689 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fabrice Santoro Hicham Arazi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1989 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 13 10 23 56.5% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 21 13 34 61.8% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1994 12 9 21 57.1% 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1995 3 7 10 30.0% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1996 5 9 14 35.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1996 1 4 5 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 19 14 33 57.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3%
24 1997 9 6 15 60.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
25 1998 14 15 29 48.3% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 17 13 30 56.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
26 1999 22 12 34 64.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 2000 17 15 32 53.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
27 2000 22 16 38 57.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2001 12 9 21 57.1% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 2001 20 15 35 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2002 10 8 18 55.6% 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2002 22 14 36 61.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2003 7 8 15 46.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5%
30 2003 11 11 22 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 2004 13 11 24 54.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2005 10 9 19 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 9 13 22 40.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 15 12 27 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 11 10 21 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 246 213 459 53.6% 128 136 264 48.5% 44 33 77 57.1% 44 53 97 45.4% — 80 87 167 47.9% 77 84 161 47.8% 18 17 35 51.4% 27 27 54 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 766/857 of Fabrice Santoro's and 75/76 of Hicham Arazi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fabrice Santoro Hicham Arazi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1991 43/47 1.3 2.4 59.8% 64.2% 47.7% 57.1% 45.6% 57.5% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 41/51 1.9 3.2 58.7% 63.0% 51.9% 51.4% 47.1% 58.2% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 46/50 1.3 2.7 61.4% 64.0% 51.2% 51.1% 47.6% 58.6% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 36/42 2.5 3.1 61.1% 66.0% 51.6% 64.6% 42.4% 60.0% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 39/41 2.0 3.4 61.1% 62.4% 48.9% 54.4% 37.3% 57.2% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 13/18 1.6 3.2 53.2% 61.7% 49.9% 50.7% 47.8% 56.1% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 48/55 3.4 2.1 50.9% 70.6% 54.1% 56.5% 43.0% 62.5% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 42/54 3.0 2.0 54.4% 67.3% 51.7% 57.4% 43.3% 60.1% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 51/61 3.1 2.4 58.3% 67.4% 50.4% 61.7% 41.5% 60.2% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 51/61 3.2 2.6 55.4% 68.5% 52.3% 55.2% 44.2% 61.1% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 51/61 2.8 1.7 57.0% 66.1% 51.9% 62.8% 47.5% 60.0% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 43/52 3.9 2.7 56.0% 69.4% 53.4% 54.4% 42.1% 62.2% 40.2% 2003 41/41 3.0 1.5 59.3% 69.4% 52.4% 58.2% 38.9% 62.5% 38.1%
30 2003 38/38 2.9 2.2 59.9% 67.0% 49.7% 47.3% 39.7% 59.9% 39.2% 2004 32/33 4.3 1.9 61.8% 67.8% 53.3% 59.6% 38.9% 62.3% 37.2%
31 2004 31/33 4.2 1.8 56.0% 69.3% 51.0% 56.2% 37.7% 61.0% 38.8% 2005 2/2 2.0 1.0 55.9% 59.0% 42.6% 50.6% 20.0% 51.4% 25.6%
32 2005 37/37 3.4 1.4 58.5% 64.7% 51.6% 59.6% 36.9% 59.4% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 42/42 4.3 2.6 58.4% 68.0% 48.9% 56.2% 46.1% 60.0% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 43/43 5.0 1.5 55.7% 72.3% 54.2% 57.1% 45.6% 64.1% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 35/35 3.5 1.3 57.5% 69.5% 53.5% 57.8% 41.1% 62.7% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2009 35/35 4.8 1.9 56.6% 69.3% 49.5% 56.5% 41.4% 60.9% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2010 1/1 0.0 1.0 60.2% 66.2% 48.8% 70.6% 50.0% 59.3% 30.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 766/897 3.1 2.3 57.4% 67.1% 51.3% 56.5% 43.2% 60.3% 39.7% — 75/417 3.5 1.7 60.3% 68.4% 52.5% 58.6% 38.4% 62.1% 37.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fabrice Santoro Hicham Arazi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1989 1509 117.4 — — — — +25 +18 — 37.5% -0.75 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 103.0 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 1685 143.3 — — — — -18 -64 — 53.2% -0.15 2–7 (22%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1698 140.2 -2.94 +4.41 1.033 50.6% -23 +17 — 55.5% +0.39 8–9 (47%) 7–4 (64%) 101.6 -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 1748 143.8 -2.09 +2.77 1.007 50.2% -63 +37 — 53.7% +0.24 7–6 (54%) 13–6 (68%) 108.5 -1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 1632 140.6 -2.07 +2.75 0.993 49.9% +48 +70 — 46.7% -0.12 9–7 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.03 1994 1487 97.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.09
21 1994 1737 139.2 -1.00 +3.08 1.062 51.3% -5 +10 — 56.3% +0.29 9–9 (50%) 8–4 (67%) 101.6 -0.43 1995 1457 106.7 — — — — +66 — — 29.4% -1.30 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 +0.11
22 1995 1611 128.7 -2.75 +0.77 0.927 48.4% -29 +106 — 43.8% -0.57 6–11 (35%) 3–8 (27%) 90.8 +0.74 1996 1546 121.8 — — — — +2 -25 +68 41.3% -0.65 7–6 (54%) 5–7 (42%) 103.3 +0.69
23 1996 1558 113.5 -2.78 -1.32 0.840 46.7% -8 +78 — 35.9% -1.13 2–2 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 97.8 +0.36 1997 1625 136.9 — — — — -45 +82 -20 50.4% -0.07 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 105.0 +0.56
24 1997 1804 152.5 +0.69 +3.16 1.085 51.3% -35 -44 — 56.1% +0.33 11–9 (55%) 11–3 (79%) 111.3 -2.98 1998 1716 146.6 — — — — -39 +16 -91 49.6% 0.00 5–11 (31%) 6–10 (38%) 94.1 -3.26
25 1998 1709 143.8 -1.02 +2.20 1.017 50.4% -3 +74 — 50.7% -0.05 10–12 (45%) 8–5 (62%) 98.4 -0.42 1999 1702 141.7 — — — — -21 +82 — 47.4% -0.41 9–5 (64%) 14–8 (64%) 107.1 -3.32
26 1999 1766 144.6 -1.34 +1.00 0.973 49.6% +38 -13 -220 56.4% +0.23 10–5 (67%) 13–8 (62%) 106.5 +1.38 2000 1775 143.8 — — — — +25 -55 -150 53.7% +0.23 12–7 (63%) 5–10 (33%) 103.1 +0.15
27 2000 1740 141.2 -0.34 +2.05 1.004 50.0% +13 +19 -204 51.0% -0.11 13–8 (62%) 10–12 (45%) 101.1 -0.61 2001 1834 144.1 — — — — +20 -121 -176 53.4% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 16–9 (64%) 106.4 -0.90
28 2001 1769 141.9 -1.14 +1.52 0.980 49.9% -19 +17 -124 56.3% +0.07 9–7 (56%) 10–6 (63%) 106.1 -0.40 2002 1700 126.9 — — — — +97 -76 — 46.7% -0.31 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 95.0 -0.75
29 2002 1740 141.0 -0.22 +2.22 1.064 51.1% +48 -51 -125 51.5% +0.12 10–12 (45%) 12–11 (52%) 95.5 +1.01 2003 1718 135.5 -0.40 +1.29 1.017 50.1% +50 -87 -83 51.0% +0.17 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 101.0 +0.03
30 2003 1709 127.8 -1.70 +2.05 0.978 49.4% +20 -96 -93 45.7% -0.26 9–10 (47%) 2–6 (25%) 95.6 -0.35 2004 1702 135.1 -0.45 +0.35 0.986 49.8% +29 -110 +6 46.0% -0.25 3–6 (33%) 7–9 (44%) 95.1 -0.40
31 2004 1816 137.3 -1.06 +1.68 0.997 49.9% -21 -159 — 50.0% +0.07 5–3 (63%) 3–5 (38%) 101.9 -0.43 2005 1665 97.8 -2.62 -3.75 0.527 39.2% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.02
32 2005 1781 146.7 -1.92 +3.04 0.990 49.9% +42 -184 -142 50.0% +0.01 6–5 (55%) 6–8 (43%) 100.4 -2.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1702 141.3 -1.28 +1.44 0.957 49.5% +11 -128 +3 48.2% -0.10 4–9 (31%) 7–8 (47%) 94.8 -2.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 1788 144.1 +1.04 +2.02 1.074 51.2% -11 — +11 55.1% +0.11 6–9 (40%) 12–5 (71%) 103.1 -1.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 1758 141.9 -0.13 +0.94 0.995 50.0% +37 -208 +68 49.4% -0.26 3–2 (60%) 9–6 (60%) 103.6 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2009 1696 134.7 -1.83 -0.14 0.922 48.5% -3 -186 +180 42.9% -0.27 6–6 (50%) 4–9 (31%) 95.4 -1.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2010 1690 110.3 +0.81 +1.44 0.747 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.33 — — — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1890 147.6 -1.17 +2.02 1.000 50.0% +6 +5 -36 51.0% -0.01 147–150 (49%) 155–133 (54%) 103.9 -1.65 — 1865 143.4 -0.48 +0.75 0.987 49.7% +14 -4 -63 48.9% -0.15 65–63 (51%) 79–72 (52%) 104.2 -1.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.