H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Fabrice Santoro vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 1-0
Fabrice Santoro holds a 1–0 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fabrice Santoro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 2004 Indianapolis second round 6-3 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2004 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Fabrice Santoro | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabrice Santoro | #142 | #17 | 1,516 | 1,889 | 456 | 432 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Fabrice Santoro | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #43 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #46 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #102 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #29 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #31 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #52 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #58 | 1,782 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,785 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #52 | 1,755 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,694 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,688 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |