H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Fabrice Santoro vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 3-1

Fabrice Santoro holds a 3–1 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fabrice Santoro leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1998 Barcelona second round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 15, 1998* Barcelona ATP 250 R64 Clay Jeff Tarango #50 6-3 6-1 Fabrice Santoro #26 Match data
Sep 16, 1993* Bordeaux ATP 250 R32 Hard Fabrice Santoro #60 6-1 6-4 Jeff Tarango #65 Match data
Mar 3, 1993* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fabrice Santoro #27 6-2 0-6 6-3 Jeff Tarango #68 Match data
Oct 8, 1992* Toulouse ATP 250 R32 Hard Fabrice Santoro #30 6-3 7-6(4) Jeff Tarango #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fabrice Santoro Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2
34 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6 — — — — — — —