H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Fabrice Santoro vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 3-1

Fabrice Santoro holds a 3–1 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fabrice Santoro leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1998 Barcelona Open round of 64 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeff Tarango #50 6-3 6-1 Fabrice Santoro #26 Match data Apr 15, 1998* R64 Barcelona Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Fabrice Santoro #60 6-1 6-4 Jeff Tarango #65 Match data Sep 16, 1993* R32 Bordeaux ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Fabrice Santoro #27 6-2 0-6 6-3 Jeff Tarango #68 Match data Mar 3, 1993* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Fabrice Santoro #30 6-3 7-6(4) Jeff Tarango #56 Match data Oct 8, 1992* R32 Toulouse ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,890 462 435 51.5% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fabrice Santoro Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1992 28–23 54.9% #43 1,748 0 0 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,631 0 0 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,736 0 0 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0
22 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,610 0 0 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0
23 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,558 0 0 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,803 0 1 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,708 0 1 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2
26 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2
27 2000 34–27 55.7% #31 1,739 0 3 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2
28 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2
29 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,740 0 4 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2004 18–15 54.5% #52 1,815 0 4 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2
32 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,781 0 4 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,701 0 4 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2
34 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,788 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,696 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,689 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fabrice Santoro Jeff Tarango
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1989 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 13 10 23 56.5% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 21 13 34 61.8% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1994 12 9 21 57.1% 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1995 3 7 10 30.0% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1996 1 4 5 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1997 9 6 15 60.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1998 14 15 29 48.3% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1999 22 12 34 64.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2000 22 16 38 57.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
28 2001 20 15 35 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
29 2002 22 14 36 61.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2003 11 11 22 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
31 2004 13 11 24 54.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2005 10 9 19 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2001 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2006 9 13 22 40.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 15 12 27 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 11 10 21 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 246 213 459 53.6% 128 136 264 48.5% 44 33 77 57.1% 44 53 97 45.4% — 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 766/857 of Fabrice Santoro's and 411/468 of Jeff Tarango's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fabrice Santoro Jeff Tarango
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1991 43/47 1.3 2.4 59.8% 64.2% 47.7% 57.1% 45.6% 57.5% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 41/51 1.9 3.2 58.7% 63.0% 51.9% 51.4% 47.1% 58.2% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 46/50 1.3 2.7 61.4% 64.0% 51.2% 51.1% 47.6% 58.6% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 36/42 2.5 3.1 61.1% 66.0% 51.6% 64.6% 42.4% 60.0% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 39/41 2.0 3.4 61.1% 62.4% 48.9% 54.4% 37.3% 57.2% 39.6% 1991 32/39 1.9 5.1 65.8% 64.8% 46.6% 56.0% 48.7% 58.5% 37.0%
23 1996 13/18 1.6 3.2 53.2% 61.7% 49.9% 50.7% 47.8% 56.1% 36.9% 1992 47/52 3.5 3.5 63.1% 67.5% 47.8% 56.6% 42.3% 60.3% 38.7%
24 1997 48/55 3.4 2.1 50.9% 70.6% 54.1% 56.5% 43.0% 62.5% 40.7% 1993 43/50 3.7 4.6 56.6% 68.4% 47.0% 59.2% 45.1% 59.1% 38.5%
25 1998 42/54 3.0 2.0 54.4% 67.3% 51.7% 57.4% 43.3% 60.1% 40.6% 1994 40/50 3.6 2.2 62.1% 65.8% 51.8% 56.4% 46.6% 60.6% 39.0%
26 1999 51/61 3.1 2.4 58.3% 67.4% 50.4% 61.7% 41.5% 60.2% 38.7% 1995 38/42 4.2 3.7 62.9% 70.3% 49.3% 54.4% 44.8% 62.3% 37.0%
27 2000 51/61 3.2 2.6 55.4% 68.5% 52.3% 55.2% 44.2% 61.1% 39.0% 1996 28/32 5.2 3.2 61.9% 68.0% 50.2% 54.3% 39.3% 61.4% 38.0%
28 2001 51/61 2.8 1.7 57.0% 66.1% 51.9% 62.8% 47.5% 60.0% 39.2% 1997 54/60 3.8 3.5 62.3% 69.2% 51.5% 52.2% 45.0% 62.3% 38.9%
29 2002 43/52 3.9 2.7 56.0% 69.4% 53.4% 54.4% 42.1% 62.2% 40.2% 1998 47/53 4.0 4.2 57.7% 67.9% 52.0% 51.3% 46.8% 61.1% 40.1%
30 2003 38/38 2.9 2.2 59.9% 67.0% 49.7% 47.3% 39.7% 59.9% 39.2% 1999 42/45 4.9 4.1 60.6% 67.1% 46.1% 61.0% 43.2% 58.9% 38.4%
31 2004 31/33 4.2 1.8 56.0% 69.3% 51.0% 56.2% 37.7% 61.0% 38.8% 2000 33/36 4.6 5.3 58.1% 68.9% 47.5% 56.9% 42.2% 60.1% 36.0%
32 2005 37/37 3.4 1.4 58.5% 64.7% 51.6% 59.6% 36.9% 59.4% 40.2% 2001 7/9 3.3 2.1 62.4% 61.8% 52.7% 53.7% 51.2% 58.4% 34.3%
33 2006 42/42 4.3 2.6 58.4% 68.0% 48.9% 56.2% 46.1% 60.0% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2007 43/43 5.0 1.5 55.7% 72.3% 54.2% 57.1% 45.6% 64.1% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 35/35 3.5 1.3 57.5% 69.5% 53.5% 57.8% 41.1% 62.7% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2009 35/35 4.8 1.9 56.6% 69.3% 49.5% 56.5% 41.4% 60.9% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2010 1/1 0.0 1.0 60.2% 66.2% 48.8% 70.6% 50.0% 59.3% 30.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 766/897 3.1 2.3 57.4% 67.1% 51.3% 56.5% 43.2% 60.3% 39.7% — 411/534 3.9 3.9 61.0% 67.8% 49.2% 55.7% 44.6% 60.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fabrice Santoro Jeff Tarango
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1989 1509 117.4 — — — — +25 +18 — 37.5% -0.75 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 1685 143.3 — — — — -18 -64 — 53.2% -0.15 2–7 (22%) 6–3 (67%) — -1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1698 140.2 -2.94 +4.41 1.033 50.6% -23 +17 — 55.5% +0.39 8–9 (47%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.38 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.19
19 1992 1748 143.8 -2.09 +2.77 1.007 50.2% -63 +37 — 53.7% +0.24 7–6 (54%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.57 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) — -0.05
20 1993 1632 140.6 -2.07 +2.75 0.993 49.9% +48 +70 — 46.7% -0.12 9–7 (56%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.03 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12
21 1994 1737 139.2 -1.00 +3.08 1.062 51.3% -5 +10 — 56.3% +0.29 9–9 (50%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.43 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.35
22 1995 1611 128.7 -2.75 +0.77 0.927 48.4% -29 +106 — 43.8% -0.57 6–11 (35%) 3–8 (27%) — +0.74 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.07
23 1996 1558 113.5 -2.78 -1.32 0.840 46.7% -8 +78 — 35.9% -1.13 2–2 (50%) 3–7 (30%) — +0.36 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.21
24 1997 1804 152.5 +0.69 +3.16 1.085 51.3% -35 -44 — 56.1% +0.33 11–9 (55%) 11–3 (79%) — -2.98 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.60
25 1998 1709 143.8 -1.02 +2.20 1.017 50.4% -3 +74 — 50.7% -0.05 10–12 (45%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.42 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.47
26 1999 1766 144.6 -1.34 +1.00 0.973 49.6% +38 -13 -220 56.4% +0.23 10–5 (67%) 13–8 (62%) — +1.38 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34
27 2000 1740 141.2 -0.34 +2.05 1.004 50.0% +13 +19 -204 51.0% -0.11 13–8 (62%) 10–12 (45%) — -0.61 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.93
28 2001 1769 141.9 -1.14 +1.52 0.980 49.9% -19 +17 -124 56.3% +0.07 9–7 (56%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.40 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.45
29 2002 1740 141.0 -0.22 +2.22 1.064 51.1% +48 -51 -125 51.5% +0.12 10–12 (45%) 12–11 (52%) — +1.01 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.03
30 2003 1709 127.8 -1.70 +2.05 0.978 49.4% +20 -96 -93 45.7% -0.26 9–10 (47%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.35 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.16
31 2004 1816 137.3 -1.06 +1.68 0.997 49.9% -21 -159 — 50.0% +0.07 5–3 (63%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.43 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.28
32 2005 1781 146.7 -1.92 +3.04 0.990 49.9% +42 -184 -142 50.0% +0.01 6–5 (55%) 6–8 (43%) — -2.81 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01
33 2006 1702 141.3 -1.28 +1.44 0.957 49.5% +11 -128 +3 48.2% -0.10 4–9 (31%) 7–8 (47%) — -2.48 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06
34 2007 1788 144.1 +1.04 +2.02 1.074 51.2% -11 — +11 55.1% +0.11 6–9 (40%) 12–5 (71%) — -1.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2008 1758 141.9 -0.13 +0.94 0.995 50.0% +37 -208 +68 49.4% -0.26 3–2 (60%) 9–6 (60%) — -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2009 1696 134.7 -1.83 -0.14 0.922 48.5% -3 -186 +180 42.9% -0.27 6–6 (50%) 4–9 (31%) — -1.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2010 1690 110.3 +0.81 +1.44 0.747 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.33 — — — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1890 147.6 -1.17 +2.02 1.000 50.0% +6 +5 -36 51.0% -0.01 147–150 (49%) 155–133 (54%) 103.9 -1.65 — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) 95.5 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.