H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Fabrice Santoro vs Julien Boutter H2H: 1-1
Fabrice Santoro and Julien Boutter are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julien Boutter leads 1–0 on carpet, while Fabrice Santoro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 2002 Madrid Masters second round 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2002* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Fabrice Santoro | 6-3 7-6(4) | Julien Boutter | Match data |
| Feb 2, 2001* | Milan | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Julien Boutter | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Fabrice Santoro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabrice Santoro | #142 | #17 | 1,516 | 1,889 | 456 | 432 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Julien Boutter | #1,092 | #46 | 790 | 1,817 | 62 | 84 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fabrice Santoro | Julien Boutter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #43 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #46 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #102 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #29 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #276 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #31 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #110 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #597 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2004 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #52 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #58 | 1,782 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,785 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2008 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #52 | 1,755 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2009 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,694 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,688 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |