H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC

Fabrice Santoro vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 2-5

Richard Krajicek holds a 5–2 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 2000 Australian Open first round 6-1 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main draw meetings
Richard Krajicek
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 19, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Richard Krajicek #10 6-1 6-2 7-5 Fabrice Santoro #25 Match data
May 9, 1998* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Fabrice Santoro #29 7-5 7-6(3) Richard Krajicek #11 Match data
Oct 30, 1997* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Richard Krajicek #11 6-3 6-4 Fabrice Santoro #29 Match data
Oct 17, 1997* Lyon ATP 250 R16 Carpet Fabrice Santoro #42 2-6 7-6(6) 7-6(4) Richard Krajicek #16 Match data
Jan 5, 1995* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Richard Krajicek #17 6-3 6-3 Fabrice Santoro #46 Match data
Apr 7, 1994* Barcelona ATP 250 R32 Clay Richard Krajicek #24 7-5 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #111 Match data
Jan 16, 1991* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Richard Krajicek #113 2-6 6-1 6-2 6-3 Fabrice Santoro #46 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Richard Krajicek #1,044 #4 3,130 2,044 408 207 66.3% 1 2 0 0 14 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fabrice Santoro Richard Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0 1991 26–20 56.5% #45 1,745 0 1
20 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0 1992 47–24 66.2% #10 1,950 0 3
21 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0 1993 36–20 64.3% #15 1,888 0 4
22 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0 1994 32–13 71.1% #17 1,883 0 7
23 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0 1995 40–20 66.7% #11 1,832 0 9
24 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1 1996 46–24 65.7% #7 1,876 1 10
25 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1 1997 50–19 72.5% #11 1,969 1 13
26 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2 1998 45–16 73.8% #10 1,975 1 15
27 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3 1999 42–20 67.7% #10 1,879 1 17
28 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3 2000 26–15 63.4% #36 1,885 1 17
29 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4 2002 7–6 53.8% #112 1,839 1 17
31 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4 2003 11–10 52.4% #147 1,762 1 17
32 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6 — — — — — — —