H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fabrice Santoro vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 1-2

Sargis Sargsian holds a 2–1 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sargis Sargsian won the 2004 Marseille third round 7-5 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Sargis Sargsian
ARM Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 26, 2004* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Sargis Sargsian #42 7-5 7-6(4) Fabrice Santoro #71 Match data
Feb 14, 2002* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Fabrice Santoro #26 6-1 3-6 7-6(11) Sargis Sargsian #70 Match data
Nov 6, 1997* Moscow ATP 250 R32 Carpet Sargis Sargsian #72 6-3 2-6 6-3 Fabrice Santoro #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Sargis Sargsian #1,525 #38 978 1,811 155 205 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fabrice Santoro Sargis Sargsian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0 1993 1–1 50.0% #615 1,514 0 0
21 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0 1995 2–2 50.0% #220 1,568 0 0
23 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0 1996 3–5 37.5% #104 1,569 0 0
24 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1 1997 18–23 43.9% #69 1,674 0 1
25 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1 1998 18–25 41.9% #98 1,623 0 1
26 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2 1999 21–23 47.7% #59 1,637 0 1
27 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3 2000 15–25 37.5% #94 1,584 0 1
28 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3 2001 16–19 45.7% #72 1,628 0 1
29 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4 2002 13–19 40.6% #103 1,650 0 1
30 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4 2003 28–26 51.9% #39 1,774 0 1
31 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4 2004 17–26 39.5% #75 1,699 0 1
32 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4 2005 3–9 25.0% #294 1,588 0 1
33 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4 2006 0–2 0.0% #809 1,576 0 1
34 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6 — — — — — — —