H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Fabrice Santoro vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 3-6

Thomas Johansson holds a 6–3 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Fabrice Santoro leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Thomas Johansson leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 2006 Marseille third round 6-4 7-6(3).

FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 6
9 main draw meetings
SWE Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 16, 2006* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Fabrice Santoro #41 6-4 7-6(3) Thomas Johansson #13 Match data
Jan 6, 2005* Doha ATP 250 R32 Hard Fabrice Santoro #52 6-4 6-2 Thomas Johansson #30 Match data
Jun 25, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Thomas Johansson #123 7-5 6-2 6-1 Fabrice Santoro #53 Match data
Oct 10, 2002* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Thomas Johansson #17 5-7 7-6(6) 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #49 Match data
Jun 17, 2001* Halle ATP 250 F Grass Thomas Johansson #19 6-3 6-7(5) 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #33 Match data
Feb 15, 2001* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Fabrice Santoro #50 6-4 6-2 Thomas Johansson #29 Match data
Nov 12, 1998* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Thomas Johansson #18 6-4 7-6(8) Fabrice Santoro #42 Match data
Oct 10, 1998* Basel ATP 250 QF Hard Thomas Johansson #22 6-3 6-3 Fabrice Santoro #30 Match data
Feb 14, 1998* St. Petersburg ATP 250 QF Carpet Thomas Johansson #41 6-3 6-3 Fabrice Santoro #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Thomas Johansson #586 #7 2,365 1,969 336 277 54.8% 1 1 0 0 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fabrice Santoro Thomas Johansson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0 1993 2–1 66.7% #422 1,535 0 0
19 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0 1994 0–2 0.0% #486 1,496 0 0
20 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0 1995 1–3 25.0% #117 1,492 0 0
21 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0 1996 28–21 57.1% #60 1,763 0 0
22 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0 1997 32–27 54.2% #39 1,699 0 2
23 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0 1998 46–30 60.5% #17 1,899 0 2
24 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1 1999 21–23 47.7% #39 1,725 0 3
25 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1 2000 22–25 46.8% #39 1,825 0 4
26 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2 2001 42–23 64.6% #18 1,875 0 6
27 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3 2002 26–22 54.2% #14 1,746 1 7
28 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4 2004 29–20 59.2% #30 1,855 1 8
30 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4 2005 42–24 63.6% #13 1,892 1 9
31 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4 2006 11–16 40.7% #71 1,723 1 9
32 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4 2007 23–23 50.0% #62 1,759 1 9
33 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4 2008 11–17 39.3% #136 1,673 1 9
34 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6