H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Fabrice Santoro vs Todd Woodbridge H2H: 1-0
Fabrice Santoro holds a 1–0 lead over Todd Woodbridge in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fabrice Santoro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 1995 Indian Wells Masters second round 6-4 1-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 1995* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Fabrice Santoro | 6-4 1-6 6-1 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabrice Santoro | #142 | #17 | 1,516 | 1,889 | 456 | 432 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fabrice Santoro | Todd Woodbridge | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #43 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #46 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #102 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #29 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2000 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #31 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2002 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2004 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #52 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #58 | 1,782 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,785 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2008 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #52 | 1,755 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2009 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,694 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,688 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |