H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Emilio Gomez holds a 1–0 lead over Facundo Bagnis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emilio Gomez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emilio Gomez won the 2021 Indian Wells Open first round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Gomez | 6-3 6-1 | Facundo Bagnis | Match data | Oct 9, 2021* | R128 | Indian Wells Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Facundo Bagnis | #500 | #55 | 985 | 1,759 | 45 | 88 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Emilio Gomez | #1,508 | #90 | 603 | 1,630 | 7 | 19 | 26.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Facundo Bagnis | Emilio Gomez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #307 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #508 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #56 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #181 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #148 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #125 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #104 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #76 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #294 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #89 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #242 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #144 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #398 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Facundo Bagnis | Emilio Gomez | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 21 | 2011 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2015 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2023 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 8 | 22 | 30 | 26.7% | 37 | 61 | 98 | 37.8% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | 6 | 15 | 21 | 28.6% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 132/133 of Facundo Bagnis's and 26/26 of Emilio Gomez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Facundo Bagnis | Emilio Gomez | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 21 | 2011 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 48.1% | 68.3% | 47.2% | 47.9% | 30.0% | 57.2% | 34.7% | 2013 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 64.7% | 68.5% | 48.9% | 74.4% | 33.3% | 62.1% | 39.1% |
| 22 | 2012 | 3/3 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 64.7% | 69.3% | 51.5% | 54.5% | 22.9% | 63.0% | 33.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 5/5 | 5.8 | 5.0 | 61.3% | 68.0% | 46.6% | 55.7% | 37.6% | 59.5% | 30.9% | 2016 | 1/1 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 59.7% | 77.9% | 44.2% | 75.0% | 25.0% | 64.3% | 27.8% |
| 25 | 2015 | 6/6 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 59.7% | 60.4% | 49.9% | 54.0% | 38.5% | 55.8% | 33.6% | 2017 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 59.8% | 70.1% | 40.0% | 37.5% | 44.4% | 58.0% | 35.7% |
| 26 | 2016 | 17/17 | 3.1 | 4.2 | 59.5% | 66.0% | 48.1% | 51.3% | 39.0% | 58.1% | 36.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 15/15 | 5.9 | 4.3 | 61.7% | 68.1% | 45.2% | 54.6% | 34.5% | 59.3% | 32.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 6/6 | 5.2 | 4.0 | 63.8% | 70.7% | 55.0% | 56.1% | 27.1% | 64.8% | 34.3% | 2020 | 3/3 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 61.5% | 63.1% | 42.6% | 42.5% | 77.8% | 54.9% | 31.0% |
| 29 | 2019 | 7/7 | 3.0 | 2.1 | 59.1% | 62.4% | 51.3% | 54.4% | 37.8% | 58.0% | 32.1% | 2021 | 5/5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 59.2% | 68.5% | 45.5% | 67.3% | 39.3% | 59.0% | 36.7% |
| 30 | 2020 | 5/5 | 4.8 | 2.4 | 60.4% | 64.5% | 55.4% | 39.8% | 26.2% | 60.7% | 37.6% | 2022 | 4/4 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 58.7% | 62.3% | 48.4% | 39.3% | 32.3% | 56.4% | 31.7% |
| 31 | 2021 | 22/23 | 5.5 | 2.9 | 60.5% | 69.6% | 49.5% | 63.3% | 43.3% | 61.8% | 38.4% | 2023 | 10/10 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 59.2% | 68.8% | 39.2% | 54.6% | 44.5% | 57.3% | 33.1% |
| 32 | 2022 | 22/22 | 5.5 | 2.3 | 62.4% | 66.9% | 50.7% | 57.5% | 41.8% | 60.8% | 38.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 11/11 | 6.1 | 2.7 | 66.3% | 61.8% | 47.4% | 54.7% | 35.9% | 57.1% | 30.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 8/8 | 3.8 | 1.9 | 64.3% | 67.7% | 51.7% | 70.7% | 45.4% | 62.0% | 39.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 3/3 | 6.0 | 1.3 | 63.7% | 68.7% | 54.3% | 62.7% | 43.7% | 63.7% | 37.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 132/133 | 4.8 | 3.1 | 61.6% | 66.7% | 49.6% | 56.7% | 38.2% | 60.0% | 35.5% | — | 26/26 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 59.8% | 67.5% | 43.2% | 54.9% | 43.9% | 57.9% | 33.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Facundo Bagnis | Emilio Gomez | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | 2010 | 1501 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 1500 | 108.9 | -0.66 | -2.78 | 0.812 | 45.4% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 | 2013 | 1556 | 113.8 | -0.65 | +2.19 | 1.032 | 50.3% | — | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.17 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1517 | 112.0 | -0.08 | +1.00 | 0.903 | 47.6% | — | +102 | — | 28.6% | -1.00 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.29 | 2014 | 1557 | 103.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 1488 | 108.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1547 | 101.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 1607 | 119.1 | -0.79 | -0.08 | 0.764 | 46.3% | — | +17 | — | 35.3% | -1.12 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.10 | 2016 | 1560 | 108.4 | -0.73 | -0.86 | 0.779 | 47.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.05 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1562 | 109.1 | -3.38 | -3.19 | 0.760 | 44.7% | — | +64 | — | 30.8% | -1.38 | 2–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.67 | 2017 | 1547 | 102.8 | -0.15 | -5.58 | 0.851 | 47.6% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.11 |
| 26 | 2016 | 1641 | 128.1 | -3.12 | -0.39 | 0.865 | 47.4% | — | +74 | — | 36.1% | -0.72 | 1–0 | 2–5 (29%) | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 1594 | 127.3 | -2.62 | -2.67 | 0.788 | 46.0% | -62 | +97 | — | 28.2% | -1.28 | 2–4 (33%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | -0.29 | 2019 | 1531 | 103.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 1633 | 121.6 | -0.02 | -0.66 | 0.976 | 48.8% | — | +66 | — | 41.2% | -0.76 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–3 (40%) | — | +0.46 | 2020 | 1542 | 107.8 | -2.03 | -1.06 | 0.687 | 43.8% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -2.22 | 0–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.49 |
| 29 | 2019 | 1630 | 113.6 | -2.00 | -2.78 | 0.765 | 45.8% | — | +102 | — | 26.7% | -1.53 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.21 | 2021 | 1590 | 117.3 | -2.27 | -0.06 | 0.896 | 48.4% | +53 | — | — | 45.5% | -0.36 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.11 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1673 | 120.0 | +0.34 | +0.61 | 0.957 | 48.7% | — | +68 | — | 33.3% | -0.75 | 0–2 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.21 | 2022 | 1547 | 106.7 | -1.90 | -2.55 | 0.726 | 44.2% | +54 | — | — | 18.2% | -2.46 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | -0.01 |
| 31 | 2021 | 1669 | 126.0 | -0.76 | -0.06 | 1.007 | 50.4% | -130 | +123 | — | 50.0% | -0.02 | 2–3 (40%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | +1.28 | 2023 | 1520 | 113.9 | -3.16 | -0.57 | 0.775 | 45.4% | +48 | -38 | — | 34.8% | -1.48 | 3–0 (100%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | -0.09 |
| 32 | 2022 | 1644 | 132.9 | -1.83 | -0.30 | 0.974 | 49.6% | -47 | +59 | — | 38.9% | -0.48 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–5 (29%) | — | -0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 1637 | 121.0 | -3.92 | -3.01 | 0.719 | 44.9% | -49 | +88 | — | 26.9% | -1.31 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–5 (0%) | — | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 1649 | 125.9 | +0.16 | +0.66 | 1.030 | 50.7% | — | +120 | — | 64.7% | +0.41 | 0–1 | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 1602 | 108.5 | -1.57 | +0.51 | 1.028 | 50.3% | — | — | — | 44.4% | -0.11 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1760 | 127.1 | -1.77 | -0.93 | 0.889 | 48.0% | -71 | +87 | — | 38.2% | -0.70 | 16–22 (42%) | 19–39 (33%) | 92.6 | +1.62 | — | 1631 | 115.8 | -2.26 | -0.82 | 0.800 | 46.2% | +51 | -38 | — | 32.8% | -1.42 | 3–6 (33%) | 7–6 (54%) | 99.9 | +2.81 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Cuevas | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 7, 2019 | H2H |
| Marco Cecchinato | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 2, 2023 | H2H |
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 26, 2022 | H2H |
| Federico Delbonis | 3 | 0 | 3 | Mar 13, 2021 | H2H |
| Dusan Lajovic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 15, 2018 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juncheng Shang | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 2, 2023 | H2H |
| Grigor Dimitrov | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 20, 2023 | H2H |
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 1 | 0 | 1 | Apr 19, 2023 | H2H |
| Marcos Giron | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 6, 2023 | H2H |
| Tommy Paul | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mar 1, 2023 | H2H |