H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Facundo Bagnis vs Joao Souza H2H: 1-0
Facundo Bagnis holds a 1–0 lead over Joao Souza in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Facundo Bagnis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Facundo Bagnis won the 2014 Rio de Janeiro third round 7-5 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 38
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2018 | Quito | ATP 250 | Q2 | Clay | Facundo Bagnis | 6-3 6-4 | Joao Souza | Match data |
| Feb 20, 2014* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Facundo Bagnis | 7-5 2-6 6-2 | Joao Souza | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Facundo Bagnis | #431 | #55 | 985 | 1,760 | 45 | 87 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Joao Souza | #1,306 | #69 | 687 | 1,669 | 25 | 47 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Facundo Bagnis | Joao Souza | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #111 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #104 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #144 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #56 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #90 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #181 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #142 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #246 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #125 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #89 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #242 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #144 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #398 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |