H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:15 UTC
Facundo Bagnis vs Viktor Troicki
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Facundo Bagnis vs Viktor Troicki.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Facundo Bagnis | #431 | #55 | 985 | 1,760 | 45 | 87 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Viktor Troicki | #1,433 | #12 | 2,015 | 2,008 | 268 | 256 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Facundo Bagnis | Viktor Troicki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,935 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2016 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #56 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2017 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #181 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #75 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2018 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #101 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #22 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #125 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2022 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #89 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #205 | 1,647 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2023 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #242 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,635 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2024 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #144 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #398 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #232 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |