H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 16:32 UTC
Facundo Diaz Acosta vs Thiago Seyboth Wild H2H: 0-1
Thiago Seyboth Wild holds a 1–0 lead over Facundo Diaz Acosta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thiago Seyboth Wild leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thiago Seyboth Wild won the 2025 Ieb+ Argentina Open third round 3-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 25
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Brazil
Age 26
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2025* | Ieb+ Argentina Open | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Thiago Seyboth Wild | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | Facundo Diaz Acosta | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2024 | Adelaide | ATP 250 | Q2 | Hard | Facundo Diaz Acosta | 2-6 7-6(6) 7-6(3) | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Facundo Diaz Acosta | #110 | #47 | 1,048 | 1,688 | 22 | 31 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Thiago Seyboth Wild | #284 | #58 | 855 | 1,775 | 38 | 50 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Facundo Diaz Acosta | Thiago Seyboth Wild | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #211 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2023 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #417 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2024 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #79 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #79 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2025 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #212 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #110 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #217 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |