H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Federico Delbonis vs Aljaz Bedene H2H: 1-1
Federico Delbonis and Aljaz Bedene are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Aljaz Bedene won the 2018 Buenos Aires semifinal 6-4 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 35
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2019 | Vienna | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | Aljaz Bedene | 6-2 7-6(6) | Federico Delbonis | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2018* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Aljaz Bedene | 6-4 2-6 6-1 | Federico Delbonis | Match data |
| Apr 25, 2012* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Federico Delbonis | 6-3 7-5 | Aljaz Bedene | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federico Delbonis | #939 | #33 | 1,435 | 1,905 | 158 | 195 | 44.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Aljaz Bedene | #1,030 | #43 | 1,169 | 1,893 | 130 | 159 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Federico Delbonis | Aljaz Bedene | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #166 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #55 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #60 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #95 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #68 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #80 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #76 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,838 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2022 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #125 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,599 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #347 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |