H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Federico Delbonis vs Andrey Kuznetsov H2H: 3-0
Federico Delbonis holds a 3–0 lead over Andrey Kuznetsov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Federico Delbonis leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Federico Delbonis won the 2017 Indian Wells Masters first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 35
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 35
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2017* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Federico Delbonis | 6-3 6-4 | Andrey Kuznetsov | Match data |
| Oct 27, 2016* | Basel | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Federico Delbonis | 6-4 6-4 | Andrey Kuznetsov | Match data |
| May 22, 2015* | Geneva | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Federico Delbonis | 6-3 6-4 | Andrey Kuznetsov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federico Delbonis | #939 | #33 | 1,435 | 1,905 | 158 | 195 | 44.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Andrey Kuznetsov | #1,435 | #39 | 1,093 | 1,952 | 72 | 100 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Federico Delbonis | Andrey Kuznetsov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #301 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #231 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #166 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #78 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #55 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #134 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #60 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #46 | 1,899 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #68 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #107 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #80 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2019 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #76 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #517 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2022 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #125 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,599 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1369 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |