H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Federico Delbonis vs Daniel Munoz de la Nava
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Federico Delbonis vs Daniel Munoz de la Nava.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 35
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federico Delbonis | #939 | #33 | 1,435 | 1,905 | 158 | 195 | 44.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Daniel Munoz de la Nava | #1,384 | #68 | 732 | 1,761 | 9 | 28 | 24.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Federico Delbonis | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #166 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #55 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2014 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #60 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #68 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #80 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #76 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2022 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #125 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,599 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #351 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |