H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Federico Delbonis vs Dmitry Tursunov H2H: 1-0
Federico Delbonis holds a 1–0 lead over Dmitry Tursunov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Federico Delbonis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Federico Delbonis won the 2013 Hamburg fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 35
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2013* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Federico Delbonis | 6-4 6-3 | Dmitry Tursunov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federico Delbonis | #939 | #33 | 1,435 | 1,905 | 158 | 195 | 44.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Dmitry Tursunov | #815 | #20 | 2,290 | 1,914 | 223 | 215 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Federico Delbonis | Dmitry Tursunov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #174 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #166 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #80 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #55 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #60 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 42–31 | 57.5% | #22 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2015 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2016 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,861 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #68 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #89 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2018 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #80 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,705 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2019 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #76 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,698 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2021 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #29 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2022 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #125 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #110 | 1,746 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,599 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #411 | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #487 | 1,622 | 0 | 7 |