H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Feliciano Lopez vs Daniel Koellerer H2H: 1-0
Feliciano Lopez holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Koellerer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Feliciano Lopez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Feliciano Lopez won the 2009 Vienna fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2009* | Vienna | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Feliciano Lopez | 6-3 6-3 | Daniel Koellerer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feliciano Lopez | #672 | #12 | 2,415 | 2,013 | 497 | 477 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Daniel Koellerer | #385 | #55 | 904 | 1,653 | 19 | 34 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Feliciano Lopez | Daniel Koellerer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #205 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #159 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #62 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #28 | 1,841 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #272 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #79 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #30 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #47 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #32 | 1,807 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #20 | 1,968 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #40 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #14 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #17 | 1,943 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #28 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #64 | 1,817 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #62 | 1,824 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #64 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #106 | 1,595 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,468 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #468 | 1,517 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |