H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Feliciano Lopez vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 1-4

Ernests Gulbis holds a 4–1 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Ernests Gulbis leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Ernests Gulbis won the 2013 Canada Masters second round 7-6(4) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Ernests Gulbis
LAT Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 31, 2022 Montpellier ATP 250 Q1 Q Hard Ernests Gulbis #265 6-1 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #107 Match data
Aug 7, 2013* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Ernests Gulbis #38 7-6(4) 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #29 Match data
Mar 9, 2013* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Ernests Gulbis #67 6-3 6-2 Feliciano Lopez #34 Match data
May 14, 2010* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Ernests Gulbis #34 6-2 7-6(0) Feliciano Lopez #32 Match data
May 1, 2010* Rome Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Ernests Gulbis #40 7-6(6) 6-1 Feliciano Lopez #35 Match data
Oct 22, 2009* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Feliciano Lopez #34 6-2 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #93 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,013 497 477 51.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,139 221 232 48.8% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Feliciano Lopez Ernests Gulbis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0 2008 22–20 52.4% #53 1,815 0 0
20 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,699 0 0 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,696 0 0
21 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,841 0 0 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,845 0 1
22 2004 30–24 55.6% #25 1,833 0 1 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,774 0 2
23 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,727 0 2
24 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,676 0 1 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,939 0 4
25 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,804 0 1 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,917 0 6
26 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,829 0 1 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6
27 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,724 0 1 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6
28 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,807 0 2 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,716 0 6
29 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,813 0 6
30 2012 24–26 48.0% #40 1,844 0 2 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,533 0 6
31 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,562 0 6
32 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,950 0 4 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6
33 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,943 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,890 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,900 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,817 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,824 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,763 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,595 0 7 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7 — — — — — — —
41 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7 — — — — — — —