Feliciano Lopez
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Ferrer | 8 | 11 | 19 | Jun 1, 2017 | H2H |
| Rafael Nadal | 4 | 10 | 14 | Nov 5, 2020 | H2H |
| Tomas Berdych | 8 | 6 | 14 | Mar 9, 2019 | H2H |
| Roger Federer | 0 | 13 | 13 | Sep 3, 2017 | H2H |
| Ivo Karlovic | 4 | 7 | 11 | May 28, 2019 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC
Fernando Verdasco holds a 6–5 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 4–3 on hard courts and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2019 Barcelona Open first round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Verdasco | 6-4 6-3 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data | Apr 24, 2019* | R64 | Barcelona Open | ATP 500 | Clay |
| Fernando Verdasco | 6-2 7-5 6-4 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data | Aug 29, 2018* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Feliciano Lopez | 6-3 6-2 3-6 6-1 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data | Aug 31, 2017* | R64 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Feliciano Lopez | 7-6(5) 7-6(1) | Fernando Verdasco | Match data | Feb 7, 2015* | SF | Quito | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Feliciano Lopez | 6-4 7-6(6) | Fernando Verdasco | Match data | Jun 21, 2013* | QF | Eastbourne Open | ATP 250 | Grass |
| Fernando Verdasco | 6-1 6-7(5) 6-1 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data | Aug 12, 2009* | R64 | Canadian Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Fernando Verdasco | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data | Mar 30, 2009* | R32 | Miami Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Fernando Verdasco | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data | Jan 10, 2008* | R32 | Sydney International | International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Feliciano Lopez | 6-4 1-6 6-2 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data | Aug 27, 2005* | QF | New Haven | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Feliciano Lopez | 7-5 6-3 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data | Feb 10, 2005* | R32 | Marseille | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Fernando Verdasco | 6-2 6-3 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data | Jul 24, 2004* | QF | Austrian Open Kitzbühel | International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feliciano Lopez | #672 | #12 | 2,415 | 2,010 | 501 | 479 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| Fernando Verdasco | #893 | #7 | 3,900 | 2,127 | 549 | 442 | 55.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Feliciano Lopez | Fernando Verdasco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #173 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #159 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #109 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #62 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #36 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #28 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #32 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2004 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #26 | 1,864 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #79 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 45–27 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,875 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2007 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #9 | 2,003 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2008 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #30 | 1,832 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,927 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2009 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #47 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,931 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #32 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2011 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #20 | 1,968 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #30 | 1,896 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2012 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #40 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #33 | 1,879 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2013 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #49 | 1,822 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2014 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #14 | 1,947 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #42 | 1,823 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 2015 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #17 | 1,942 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,895 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #28 | 1,888 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 33–28 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,914 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | 2017 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,902 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #49 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | 2018 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #64 | 1,806 | 0 | 6 | 2020 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,768 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | 2019 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #62 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 | 2021 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #64 | 1,756 | 0 | 7 | 2022 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 39 | 2021 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #106 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 | 2023 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #651 | 1,535 | 0 | 7 |
| 40 | 2022 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,468 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #468 | 1,517 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Feliciano Lopez | Fernando Verdasco | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1998 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2003 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2005 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 22 | 2004 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 58.6% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2006 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 17 | 9 | 26 | 65.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2005 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 56.3% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2007 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 56.3% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 24 | 2006 | 9 | 16 | 25 | 36.0% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2008 | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2009 | 35 | 15 | 50 | 70.0% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2008 | 17 | 17 | 34 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 21 | 13 | 34 | 61.8% | 22 | 7 | 29 | 75.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 11 | 15 | 26 | 42.3% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 19 | 14 | 33 | 57.6% | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 19 | 10 | 29 | 65.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 15 | 16 | 31 | 48.4% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 22 | 16 | 38 | 57.9% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 13 | 15 | 28 | 46.4% | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 20 | 14 | 34 | 58.8% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 18 | 15 | 33 | 54.5% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 56.3% | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 34.8% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 48.1% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2020 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2021 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 16.7% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2022 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2023 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 272 | 277 | 549 | 49.5% | 130 | 137 | 267 | 48.7% | 89 | 53 | 142 | 62.7% | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | — | 259 | 235 | 494 | 52.4% | 231 | 156 | 387 | 59.7% | 51 | 44 | 95 | 53.7% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 957/979 of Feliciano Lopez's and 988/991 of Fernando Verdasco's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Feliciano Lopez | Fernando Verdasco | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 1998 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 73.0% | 37.0% | 50.0% | 28.6% | 0.0% | 40.5% | 34.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 3/3 | 1.7 | 6.3 | 71.8% | 56.3% | 32.1% | 54.4% | 39.3% | 49.7% | 37.0% |
| 19 | 2001 | 7/7 | 5.6 | 2.9 | 59.3% | 66.9% | 49.1% | 54.8% | 43.7% | 59.4% | 35.1% | 2003 | 18/19 | 5.0 | 4.3 | 64.8% | 68.3% | 55.7% | 51.0% | 42.6% | 63.8% | 34.4% |
| 20 | 2002 | 30/34 | 9.7 | 4.3 | 60.4% | 73.0% | 48.8% | 58.0% | 42.1% | 63.4% | 30.5% | 2004 | 56/56 | 4.8 | 3.2 | 66.0% | 71.0% | 56.3% | 65.5% | 40.6% | 65.7% | 37.3% |
| 21 | 2003 | 61/65 | 8.1 | 3.3 | 58.2% | 74.6% | 52.4% | 67.5% | 43.8% | 65.3% | 33.3% | 2005 | 61/61 | 6.6 | 3.7 | 65.1% | 72.5% | 51.7% | 60.0% | 44.5% | 65.2% | 38.9% |
| 22 | 2004 | 54/57 | 10.3 | 3.6 | 57.2% | 77.2% | 51.9% | 62.9% | 40.9% | 66.4% | 32.3% | 2006 | 56/56 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 72.5% | 68.7% | 49.7% | 62.8% | 43.6% | 63.3% | 38.3% |
| 23 | 2005 | 57/57 | 8.6 | 3.3 | 59.8% | 75.5% | 50.0% | 64.7% | 36.1% | 65.3% | 32.9% | 2007 | 59/59 | 4.6 | 3.4 | 72.4% | 70.2% | 52.2% | 55.3% | 38.6% | 65.1% | 38.2% |
| 24 | 2006 | 47/47 | 9.9 | 3.6 | 57.2% | 75.3% | 48.3% | 55.3% | 36.9% | 63.9% | 33.4% | 2008 | 72/72 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 72.6% | 69.3% | 53.0% | 55.6% | 47.6% | 64.7% | 40.8% |
| 25 | 2007 | 51/51 | 10.0 | 3.5 | 59.7% | 75.5% | 52.4% | 57.9% | 40.5% | 66.1% | 32.9% | 2009 | 75/75 | 6.1 | 3.7 | 69.1% | 73.1% | 54.3% | 62.2% | 46.5% | 67.1% | 41.1% |
| 26 | 2008 | 47/47 | 11.8 | 3.2 | 60.1% | 75.7% | 54.2% | 66.9% | 41.9% | 66.9% | 32.1% | 2010 | 64/64 | 5.4 | 4.8 | 67.1% | 71.2% | 49.4% | 60.0% | 44.6% | 64.0% | 40.3% |
| 27 | 2009 | 39/40 | 9.7 | 2.7 | 59.1% | 73.5% | 50.3% | 61.4% | 41.0% | 64.2% | 32.2% | 2011 | 58/58 | 5.5 | 3.9 | 68.8% | 70.7% | 51.3% | 61.5% | 44.9% | 64.6% | 38.1% |
| 28 | 2010 | 49/50 | 10.5 | 3.3 | 57.4% | 77.3% | 50.8% | 63.1% | 37.8% | 65.9% | 32.3% | 2012 | 53/54 | 4.6 | 3.8 | 69.7% | 69.7% | 51.4% | 64.4% | 42.1% | 64.1% | 38.3% |
| 29 | 2011 | 60/60 | 12.2 | 3.7 | 57.6% | 77.2% | 53.7% | 64.7% | 36.4% | 67.2% | 32.7% | 2013 | 50/51 | 5.9 | 5.0 | 61.7% | 72.8% | 54.0% | 56.4% | 36.3% | 65.3% | 37.4% |
| 30 | 2012 | 50/53 | 9.9 | 3.4 | 56.6% | 76.1% | 51.1% | 66.1% | 38.5% | 65.3% | 32.4% | 2014 | 46/46 | 5.7 | 4.7 | 66.3% | 71.7% | 51.8% | 65.6% | 43.2% | 64.5% | 37.3% |
| 31 | 2013 | 49/50 | 11.1 | 3.6 | 58.9% | 74.8% | 53.2% | 68.2% | 39.1% | 66.2% | 33.8% | 2015 | 50/50 | 7.7 | 4.1 | 64.6% | 73.5% | 52.3% | 60.8% | 35.2% | 66.1% | 35.3% |
| 32 | 2014 | 64/65 | 10.0 | 3.1 | 59.5% | 77.2% | 52.4% | 64.0% | 36.1% | 67.2% | 32.4% | 2016 | 55/55 | 6.3 | 3.9 | 64.0% | 73.2% | 51.4% | 62.1% | 38.4% | 65.1% | 37.8% |
| 33 | 2015 | 58/58 | 12.7 | 3.6 | 57.3% | 76.5% | 53.6% | 66.4% | 33.4% | 66.8% | 34.1% | 2017 | 54/54 | 4.0 | 3.4 | 69.0% | 70.6% | 51.0% | 53.7% | 45.7% | 64.6% | 39.5% |
| 34 | 2016 | 53/53 | 11.0 | 3.2 | 57.8% | 77.8% | 51.5% | 63.1% | 38.5% | 66.5% | 35.4% | 2018 | 61/61 | 6.7 | 4.2 | 63.1% | 72.0% | 48.7% | 59.3% | 42.9% | 63.4% | 39.0% |
| 35 | 2017 | 48/49 | 10.8 | 2.9 | 59.5% | 77.0% | 51.4% | 64.1% | 38.3% | 66.5% | 32.8% | 2019 | 53/53 | 7.7 | 3.7 | 63.8% | 71.8% | 49.4% | 62.4% | 40.0% | 63.7% | 36.0% |
| 36 | 2018 | 42/43 | 11.8 | 3.1 | 60.9% | 76.5% | 48.6% | 63.3% | 39.5% | 65.4% | 32.2% | 2020 | 13/13 | 6.3 | 2.6 | 67.5% | 68.9% | 49.5% | 59.7% | 29.5% | 62.7% | 36.4% |
| 37 | 2019 | 26/28 | 12.9 | 4.2 | 56.7% | 76.5% | 51.9% | 66.8% | 36.0% | 66.0% | 31.5% | 2021 | 10/10 | 3.9 | 3.2 | 66.9% | 60.7% | 48.4% | 54.2% | 28.3% | 56.6% | 35.0% |
| 38 | 2020 | 17/17 | 14.2 | 5.1 | 53.7% | 79.3% | 47.9% | 70.8% | 37.0% | 64.8% | 31.2% | 2022 | 16/16 | 4.3 | 2.9 | 63.4% | 66.0% | 48.6% | 58.4% | 37.6% | 59.8% | 36.2% |
| 39 | 2021 | 29/29 | 10.4 | 4.8 | 55.1% | 77.3% | 50.8% | 53.0% | 43.1% | 65.2% | 30.2% | 2023 | 5/5 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 62.6% | 53.7% | 32.4% | 36.3% | 45.3% | 45.6% | 34.0% |
| 40 | 2022 | 11/11 | 9.4 | 5.6 | 51.6% | 74.1% | 39.5% | 56.6% | 18.7% | 57.1% | 29.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2023 | 7/7 | 10.4 | 4.4 | 54.3% | 76.6% | 52.7% | 65.7% | 26.4% | 65.9% | 29.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Feliciano Lopez | Fernando Verdasco | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1998 | 1491 | 95.8 | +0.71 | -0.39 | 0.571 | 36.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 1480 | 100.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.09 | 2002 | 1502 | 102.0 | -2.56 | -2.05 | 0.736 | 44.2% | — | +27 | — | 28.6% | -1.72 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.02 |
| 19 | 2001 | 1520 | 116.2 | -0.46 | -2.22 | 0.863 | 47.5% | — | +31 | — | 38.9% | -0.78 | 0–3 (0%) | 3–1 (75%) | 98.5 | +0.17 | 2003 | 1592 | 125.8 | +1.64 | -0.91 | 0.950 | 48.7% | +9 | -89 | — | 39.6% | -0.77 | 2–4 (33%) | 7–7 (50%) | 99.9 | -0.48 |
| 20 | 2002 | 1698 | 127.3 | +1.48 | -5.32 | 0.834 | 47.5% | -42 | -107 | -65 | 47.5% | -0.35 | 13–4 (76%) | 10–8 (56%) | 114.4 | +0.51 | 2004 | 1731 | 140.6 | +2.76 | +0.54 | 1.085 | 51.4% | -84 | +24 | -92 | 53.2% | +0.29 | 6–8 (43%) | 11–12 (48%) | 100.4 | -1.34 |
| 21 | 2003 | 1841 | 141.9 | +3.32 | -2.91 | 0.959 | 49.6% | -82 | -104 | -140 | 51.6% | -0.01 | 11–11 (50%) | 20–17 (54%) | 105.0 | -2.29 | 2005 | 1791 | 146.9 | +2.51 | +2.36 | 1.116 | 51.9% | -27 | +11 | -149 | 55.1% | +0.46 | 10–12 (45%) | 12–11 (52%) | 100.7 | -2.07 |
| 22 | 2004 | 1843 | 141.1 | +3.06 | -2.87 | 0.962 | 49.6% | -4 | -87 | -139 | 53.5% | +0.07 | 12–9 (57%) | 13–16 (45%) | 100.2 | +0.64 | 2006 | 1727 | 137.0 | +0.96 | +1.48 | 1.042 | 50.6% | -72 | +110 | +30 | 56.5% | +0.19 | 10–10 (50%) | 14–10 (58%) | 101.8 | +0.48 |
| 23 | 2005 | 1760 | 138.7 | +2.28 | -3.17 | 0.949 | 49.1% | -15 | -35 | +85 | 52.0% | -0.07 | 13–7 (65%) | 18–15 (55%) | 103.7 | -0.87 | 2007 | 1864 | 150.9 | +2.40 | +2.23 | 1.097 | 51.3% | -58 | -13 | -91 | 54.4% | +0.38 | 11–10 (52%) | 10–14 (42%) | 101.0 | -1.77 |
| 24 | 2006 | 1676 | 133.5 | +1.55 | -2.92 | 0.925 | 48.9% | -40 | +59 | +97 | 41.8% | -0.47 | 9–9 (50%) | 11–13 (46%) | 98.3 | -1.61 | 2008 | 1876 | 151.0 | +1.44 | +3.82 | 1.154 | 52.4% | -51 | +93 | +36 | 58.0% | +0.69 | 13–9 (59%) | 13–14 (48%) | 101.8 | +1.79 |
| 25 | 2007 | 1803 | 144.0 | +3.00 | -2.42 | 0.971 | 49.7% | -12 | -87 | -39 | 52.6% | -0.04 | 8–10 (44%) | 21–14 (60%) | 104.0 | -1.68 | 2009 | 2004 | 172.3 | +4.14 | +5.15 | 1.247 | 53.9% | +20 | +44 | -100 | 66.0% | +1.22 | 11–12 (48%) | 15–19 (44%) | 96.0 | -0.23 |
| 26 | 2008 | 1832 | 150.3 | +3.61 | -2.59 | 0.970 | 49.7% | +8 | -169 | +26 | 50.4% | -0.12 | 6–10 (38%) | 17–8 (68%) | 103.6 | -1.42 | 2010 | 1928 | 161.5 | +1.35 | +3.83 | 1.119 | 52.0% | +11 | +172 | — | 59.1% | +0.69 | 18–5 (78%) | 17–17 (50%) | 104.3 | +1.41 |
| 27 | 2009 | 1726 | 141.9 | +1.43 | -2.88 | 0.900 | 48.4% | +26 | -48 | +98 | 47.2% | -0.30 | 7–11 (39%) | 13–9 (59%) | 100.2 | -0.15 | 2011 | 1931 | 156.9 | +1.76 | +2.02 | 1.077 | 51.0% | -19 | +115 | -49 | 55.4% | +0.39 | 9–9 (50%) | 9–10 (47%) | 97.4 | -0.03 |
| 28 | 2010 | 1802 | 148.0 | +2.32 | -2.85 | 0.948 | 49.5% | -6 | -112 | +49 | 50.0% | -0.03 | 6–2 (75%) | 13–13 (50%) | 104.4 | +0.29 | 2012 | 1902 | 158.3 | +1.78 | +1.64 | 1.068 | 50.9% | -15 | +110 | -16 | 57.3% | +0.45 | 7–6 (54%) | 10–11 (48%) | 96.5 | +0.32 |
| 29 | 2011 | 1969 | 161.7 | +4.60 | -2.41 | 0.997 | 49.9% | -64 | -112 | +32 | 55.2% | +0.10 | 12–10 (55%) | 28–17 (62%) | 111.3 | -3.54 | 2013 | 1897 | 150.8 | +1.90 | +1.27 | 1.077 | 50.9% | -69 | +47 | +113 | 54.3% | +0.20 | 11–12 (48%) | 14–10 (58%) | 102.3 | -0.19 |
| 30 | 2012 | 1858 | 151.5 | +1.97 | -3.28 | 0.934 | 49.0% | +2 | -55 | +79 | 48.8% | +0.13 | 10–5 (67%) | 14–25 (36%) | 96.1 | -1.11 | 2014 | 1880 | 147.7 | +0.99 | +0.74 | 1.048 | 50.8% | -58 | +69 | +74 | 55.4% | +0.36 | 11–12 (48%) | 12–16 (43%) | 94.8 | +1.67 |
| 31 | 2013 | 1915 | 149.8 | +2.60 | -1.97 | 0.997 | 50.1% | -40 | -64 | +140 | 53.7% | +0.07 | 9–6 (60%) | 14–10 (58%) | 105.2 | -0.06 | 2015 | 1822 | 158.0 | +2.13 | -0.07 | 1.043 | 50.6% | -12 | +53 | +115 | 47.4% | +0.18 | 12–11 (52%) | 13–16 (45%) | 97.0 | -2.42 |
| 32 | 2014 | 1948 | 155.3 | +3.04 | -2.60 | 0.987 | 49.8% | -17 | -179 | +209 | 55.8% | +0.15 | 14–3 (82%) | 22–19 (54%) | 109.9 | +2.25 | 2016 | 1823 | 157.6 | +1.70 | +1.52 | 1.083 | 51.2% | -31 | +108 | +59 | 53.3% | +0.30 | 6–12 (33%) | 15–12 (56%) | 97.7 | -1.95 |
| 33 | 2015 | 1943 | 158.0 | +2.20 | -0.75 | 1.029 | 50.3% | +56 | -176 | +79 | 54.8% | +0.18 | 12–13 (48%) | 26–15 (63%) | 102.1 | +2.95 | 2017 | 1896 | 164.3 | +0.98 | +3.38 | 1.115 | 51.7% | -12 | +46 | -99 | 55.4% | +0.30 | 6–15 (29%) | 18–9 (67%) | 98.6 | -2.48 |
| 34 | 2016 | 1889 | 154.0 | +2.36 | -0.30 | 1.055 | 50.8% | +25 | -36 | +78 | 54.5% | +0.23 | 10–10 (50%) | 20–15 (57%) | 102.4 | +1.68 | 2018 | 1915 | 159.9 | -0.10 | +2.46 | 1.065 | 50.9% | +25 | +13 | -172 | 51.9% | +0.27 | 15–11 (58%) | 8–17 (32%) | 94.6 | -1.33 |
| 35 | 2017 | 1903 | 154.4 | +2.94 | -2.24 | 0.978 | 49.7% | -97 | -32 | +126 | 51.2% | +0.07 | 11–10 (52%) | 16–15 (52%) | 99.6 | -1.42 | 2019 | 1810 | 151.6 | -0.18 | +0.45 | 0.990 | 50.1% | +22 | +37 | +5 | 51.4% | +0.28 | 13–13 (50%) | 8–11 (42%) | 96.5 | -0.47 |
| 36 | 2018 | 1806 | 142.4 | +1.63 | -2.71 | 0.932 | 49.0% | -27 | +12 | +191 | 44.6% | -0.49 | 10–4 (71%) | 13–9 (59%) | 107.5 | +0.44 | 2020 | 1768 | 132.5 | -0.34 | -1.01 | 0.975 | 49.0% | +72 | — | — | 48.5% | -0.27 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–0 | — | -0.38 |
| 37 | 2019 | 1808 | 139.4 | +1.43 | -2.84 | 0.926 | 48.8% | -26 | -93 | +213 | 47.3% | -0.08 | 7–5 (58%) | 9–13 (41%) | 99.1 | -1.25 | 2021 | 1627 | 114.6 | -2.83 | -1.10 | 0.807 | 46.0% | — | +81 | — | 25.0% | -1.25 | — | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.25 |
| 38 | 2020 | 1756 | 143.9 | +1.90 | -3.41 | 0.888 | 48.9% | +5 | -63 | — | 40.9% | -0.45 | 3–3 (50%) | 5–5 (50%) | 100.8 | -1.13 | 2022 | 1604 | 122.9 | -3.29 | -0.30 | 0.900 | 48.1% | +74 | +90 | — | 36.6% | -0.81 | 2–4 (33%) | 5–5 (50%) | 98.8 | +0.75 |
| 39 | 2021 | 1593 | 125.8 | +0.90 | -5.11 | 0.867 | 47.8% | +32 | +34 | +333 | 36.8% | -0.80 | 2–9 (18%) | 8–7 (53%) | 90.3 | +0.52 | 2023 | 1536 | 96.8 | -6.12 | -1.90 | 0.625 | 40.2% | +105 | — | — | 9.1% | -3.27 | 0–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.03 |
| 40 | 2022 | 1468 | 99.6 | -3.78 | -3.84 | 0.681 | 43.1% | +58 | — | +305 | 14.3% | -2.43 | 0–3 (0%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.8 | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2023 | 1517 | 114.8 | +0.13 | -1.94 | 0.853 | 48.1% | — | — | +211 | 43.8% | -0.87 | 1–1 | 3–3 (50%) | — | -0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2011 | 152.3 | +2.42 | -2.62 | 0.953 | 49.3% | -16 | -72 | +109 | 49.9% | -0.11 | 186–158 (54%) | 319–269 (54%) | 107.2 | -0.72 | — | 2128 | 158.8 | +1.50 | +2.00 | 1.077 | 51.2% | -17 | +67 | -9 | 54.3% | +0.35 | 175–178 (50%) | 214–226 (49%) | 97.0 | -0.90 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Ferrer | 8 | 11 | 19 | Jun 1, 2017 | H2H |
| Rafael Nadal | 4 | 10 | 14 | Nov 5, 2020 | H2H |
| Tomas Berdych | 8 | 6 | 14 | Mar 9, 2019 | H2H |
| Roger Federer | 0 | 13 | 13 | Sep 3, 2017 | H2H |
| Ivo Karlovic | 4 | 7 | 11 | May 28, 2019 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Ferrer | 7 | 15 | 22 | Jul 22, 2017 | H2H |
| Rafael Nadal | 3 | 17 | 20 | May 18, 2019 | H2H |
| Andy Murray | 4 | 13 | 17 | Oct 15, 2020 | H2H |
| Marin Cilic | 5 | 10 | 15 | Jan 20, 2019 | H2H |
| Tomas Berdych | 4 | 11 | 15 | Jan 3, 2019 | H2H |