H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Feliciano Lopez vs Janko Tipsarevic H2H: 5-1

Feliciano Lopez holds a 5–1 lead over Janko Tipsarevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Feliciano Lopez leads 4–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Feliciano Lopez won the 2011 Shanghai Masters first round 7-6(2) 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Janko Tipsarevic
SRB Age 42 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Feliciano Lopez #28 7-6(2) 7-6(3) Janko Tipsarevic #13 Match data Oct 11, 2011* R64 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Feliciano Lopez #43 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) Janko Tipsarevic #37 Match data Apr 12, 2011* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Janko Tipsarevic #64 6-7(9) 6-4 7-6(4) 6-3 Feliciano Lopez #30 Match data May 28, 2009* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Feliciano Lopez #33 6-3 6-4 Janko Tipsarevic #45 Match data Oct 28, 2008* R64 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Feliciano Lopez #41 6-3 4-6 6-4 Janko Tipsarevic #40 Match data Mar 6, 2008* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Feliciano Lopez #62 7-6(5) 7-6(2) Janko Tipsarevic #51 Match data Aug 21, 2007* R64 New Haven International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,010 501 479 51.1% 0 0 0 3 4 7
Janko Tipsarevic #755 #8 3,320 2,069 248 243 50.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Feliciano Lopez Janko Tipsarevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0 2003 1–2 33.3% #161 1,565 0 0
20 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,697 0 0 2004 2–7 22.2% #117 1,553 0 0
21 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,840 0 0 2005 7–15 31.8% #139 1,544 0 0
22 2004 32–25 56.1% #25 1,842 0 1 2006 8–17 32.0% #64 1,556 0 0
23 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1 2007 17–21 44.7% #52 1,735 0 0
24 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,675 0 1 2008 25–22 53.2% #49 1,733 0 0
25 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,803 0 1 2009 26–23 53.1% #38 1,822 0 0
26 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,832 0 1 2010 22–22 50.0% #49 1,809 0 0
27 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,725 0 1 2011 49–24 67.1% #9 2,008 0 2
28 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,801 0 2 2012 50–27 64.9% #9 1,970 0 3
29 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2 2013 19–23 45.2% #36 1,768 0 4
30 2012 26–27 49.1% #40 1,857 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3 2015 3–7 30.0% #410 1,687 0 4
32 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,947 0 4 2016 7–10 41.2% #144 1,747 0 4
33 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,942 0 4 2017 5–12 29.4% #105 1,664 0 4
34 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,888 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,902 0 6 2019 7–11 38.9% #219 1,665 0 4
36 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,806 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,807 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,756 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,593 0 7 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7 — — — — — — —
41 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Feliciano Lopez Janko Tipsarevic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2004 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2003 14 14 28 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 2005 2 5 7 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2004 17 12 29 58.6% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2006 3 7 10 30.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2005 18 14 32 56.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2007 8 12 20 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2006 9 16 25 36.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2008 16 15 31 51.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
25 2007 20 15 35 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 17 12 29 58.6% 6 8 14 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2008 17 17 34 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2010 18 17 35 51.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
27 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 38 17 55 69.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
28 2010 15 15 30 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2012 29 18 47 61.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
29 2011 17 15 32 53.1% 13 8 21 61.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2012 15 16 31 48.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2014 22 16 38 57.9% 6 7 13 46.2% 12 2 14 85.7% — — — — 2016 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 2015 20 14 34 58.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2017 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
34 2016 16 14 30 53.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 8 15 23 34.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2019 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 2018 12 12 24 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 7 10 17 41.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 2 10 12 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 272 277 549 49.5% 130 137 267 48.7% 89 53 142 62.7% 10 12 22 45.5% — 159 142 301 52.8% 49 61 110 44.5% 38 34 72 52.8% 2 6 8 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 957/979 of Feliciano Lopez's and 484/491 of Janko Tipsarevic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Feliciano Lopez Janko Tipsarevic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 1998 1/1 0.0 0.0 73.0% 37.0% 50.0% 28.6% 0.0% 40.5% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 7/7 5.6 2.9 59.3% 66.9% 49.1% 54.8% 43.7% 59.4% 35.1% 2003 3/3 6.0 1.7 54.3% 69.5% 55.6% 43.6% 40.6% 62.7% 34.5%
20 2002 30/34 9.7 4.3 60.4% 73.0% 48.8% 58.0% 42.1% 63.4% 30.5% 2004 9/9 7.7 3.3 58.4% 71.0% 46.0% 53.8% 30.4% 60.8% 36.4%
21 2003 61/65 8.1 3.3 58.2% 74.6% 52.4% 67.5% 43.8% 65.3% 33.3% 2005 22/22 5.7 3.1 51.9% 70.6% 51.3% 48.7% 34.1% 61.3% 34.8%
22 2004 54/57 10.3 3.6 57.2% 77.2% 51.9% 62.9% 40.9% 66.4% 32.3% 2006 25/25 7.1 2.2 57.1% 75.0% 49.3% 50.8% 34.2% 64.0% 34.1%
23 2005 57/57 8.6 3.3 59.8% 75.5% 50.0% 64.7% 36.1% 65.3% 32.9% 2007 38/38 8.0 2.7 55.2% 74.6% 47.1% 56.6% 43.5% 61.6% 32.1%
24 2006 47/47 9.9 3.6 57.2% 75.3% 48.3% 55.3% 36.9% 63.9% 33.4% 2008 44/47 9.3 2.6 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 52.5% 43.7% 64.8% 34.4%
25 2007 51/51 10.0 3.5 59.7% 75.5% 52.4% 57.9% 40.5% 66.1% 32.9% 2009 49/49 6.4 2.5 55.7% 73.8% 51.7% 57.1% 44.2% 63.9% 36.6%
26 2008 47/47 11.8 3.2 60.1% 75.7% 54.2% 66.9% 41.9% 66.9% 32.1% 2010 44/44 7.0 2.0 57.3% 72.7% 54.1% 60.0% 41.3% 64.7% 36.3%
27 2009 39/40 9.7 2.7 59.1% 73.5% 50.3% 61.4% 41.0% 64.2% 32.2% 2011 72/73 6.1 2.3 56.0% 76.7% 56.2% 61.0% 49.2% 67.6% 40.8%
28 2010 49/50 10.5 3.3 57.4% 77.3% 50.8% 63.1% 37.8% 65.9% 32.3% 2012 74/77 7.8 2.5 56.9% 75.3% 53.7% 60.1% 42.7% 66.0% 37.6%
29 2011 60/60 12.2 3.7 57.6% 77.2% 53.7% 64.7% 36.4% 67.2% 32.7% 2013 42/42 6.2 2.2 57.9% 71.8% 51.9% 64.7% 38.7% 63.3% 34.9%
30 2012 50/53 9.9 3.4 56.6% 76.1% 51.1% 66.1% 38.5% 65.3% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 49/50 11.1 3.6 58.9% 74.8% 53.2% 68.2% 39.1% 66.2% 33.8% 2015 10/10 6.7 3.4 53.8% 71.1% 48.1% 54.1% 30.7% 60.5% 34.7%
32 2014 64/65 10.0 3.1 59.5% 77.2% 52.4% 64.0% 36.1% 67.2% 32.4% 2016 17/17 5.5 3.4 55.1% 74.4% 49.6% 60.7% 42.0% 63.5% 33.5%
33 2015 58/58 12.7 3.6 57.3% 76.5% 53.6% 66.4% 33.4% 66.8% 34.1% 2017 17/17 6.1 3.1 54.1% 70.6% 46.5% 48.8% 38.7% 59.6% 33.8%
34 2016 53/53 11.0 3.2 57.8% 77.8% 51.5% 63.1% 38.5% 66.5% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 48/49 10.8 2.9 59.5% 77.0% 51.4% 64.1% 38.3% 66.5% 32.8% 2019 18/18 5.3 2.8 58.7% 69.7% 48.4% 58.0% 39.6% 60.8% 38.7%
36 2018 42/43 11.8 3.1 60.9% 76.5% 48.6% 63.3% 39.5% 65.4% 32.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 26/28 12.9 4.2 56.7% 76.5% 51.9% 66.8% 36.0% 66.0% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 17/17 14.2 5.1 53.7% 79.3% 47.9% 70.8% 37.0% 64.8% 31.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 29/29 10.4 4.8 55.1% 77.3% 50.8% 53.0% 43.1% 65.2% 30.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 11/11 9.4 5.6 51.6% 74.1% 39.5% 56.6% 18.7% 57.1% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
41 2023 7/7 10.4 4.4 54.3% 76.6% 52.7% 65.7% 26.4% 65.9% 29.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 957/980 10.5 3.5 58.2% 76.0% 51.4% 63.4% 38.4% 65.7% 32.7% — 484/491 6.9 2.5 56.2% 73.9% 51.9% 57.6% 41.9% 64.1% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Feliciano Lopez Janko Tipsarevic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1998 1491 95.8 +0.71 -0.39 0.571 36.7% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1480 100.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1520 116.2 -0.46 -2.22 0.863 47.5% — +31 — 38.9% -0.78 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 98.5 +0.17 2003 1565 113.0 -0.22 +0.55 0.924 48.2% +9 — — 28.6% -1.28 — 1–1 — -0.28
20 2002 1698 127.3 +1.48 -5.32 0.834 47.5% -42 -107 -65 47.5% -0.35 13–4 (76%) 10–8 (56%) 114.4 +0.51 2004 1554 115.3 -1.04 -1.30 0.929 48.4% -23 — — 30.8% -0.69 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.51
21 2003 1841 141.9 +3.32 -2.91 0.959 49.6% -82 -104 -140 51.6% -0.01 11–11 (50%) 20–17 (54%) 105.0 -2.29 2005 1545 121.5 -1.24 -1.36 0.900 48.0% -6 +49 +94 35.0% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 4–7 (36%) 97.8 +0.44
22 2004 1843 141.1 +3.06 -2.87 0.962 49.6% -4 -87 -139 53.5% +0.07 12–9 (57%) 13–16 (45%) 100.2 +0.64 2006 1557 119.7 +1.24 -1.88 0.947 48.5% +8 -55 +107 38.2% -0.88 4–6 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 100.9 -0.13
23 2005 1760 138.7 +2.28 -3.17 0.949 49.1% -15 -35 +85 52.0% -0.07 13–7 (65%) 18–15 (55%) 103.7 -0.87 2007 1735 133.6 -0.76 -2.94 0.836 46.9% -60 -192 +8 46.9% -0.29 8–5 (62%) 7–9 (44%) 105.4 -1.63
24 2006 1676 133.5 +1.55 -2.92 0.925 48.9% -40 +59 +97 41.8% -0.47 9–9 (50%) 11–13 (46%) 98.3 -1.61 2008 1734 143.1 +1.16 -1.11 0.978 49.7% -22 -145 +100 55.6% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 17–14 (55%) 108.6 +1.14
25 2007 1803 144.0 +3.00 -2.42 0.971 49.7% -12 -87 -39 52.6% -0.04 8–10 (44%) 21–14 (60%) 104.0 -1.68 2009 1822 147.5 +0.76 +0.05 1.011 50.4% -6 -158 +1 54.8% +0.23 4–9 (31%) 12–9 (57%) 97.8 -1.85
26 2008 1832 150.3 +3.61 -2.59 0.970 49.7% +8 -169 +26 50.4% -0.12 6–10 (38%) 17–8 (68%) 103.6 -1.42 2010 1809 151.3 +1.01 +0.14 1.028 50.6% +32 — -18 53.3% +0.22 3–6 (33%) 11–8 (58%) 99.7 +0.29
27 2009 1726 141.9 +1.43 -2.88 0.900 48.4% +26 -48 +98 47.2% -0.30 7–11 (39%) 13–9 (59%) 100.2 -0.15 2011 2008 161.8 +4.65 +3.68 1.259 53.8% +27 -302 -174 67.9% +1.30 9–9 (50%) 17–15 (53%) 99.0 +2.83
28 2010 1802 148.0 +2.32 -2.85 0.948 49.5% -6 -112 +49 50.0% -0.03 6–2 (75%) 13–13 (50%) 104.4 +0.29 2012 1971 166.2 +3.35 +1.51 1.105 51.6% -5 +2 -70 63.4% +0.64 13–10 (57%) 22–12 (65%) 109.2 +3.81
29 2011 1969 161.7 +4.60 -2.41 0.997 49.9% -64 -112 +32 55.2% +0.10 12–10 (55%) 28–17 (62%) 111.3 -3.54 2013 1768 146.7 +0.25 -1.48 0.952 49.4% +60 +92 — 45.7% -0.06 8–4 (67%) 5–13 (28%) 96.2 +2.99
30 2012 1858 151.5 +1.97 -3.28 0.934 49.0% +2 -55 +79 48.8% +0.13 10–5 (67%) 14–25 (36%) 96.1 -1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1915 149.8 +2.60 -1.97 0.997 50.1% -40 -64 +140 53.7% +0.07 9–6 (60%) 14–10 (58%) 105.2 -0.06 2015 1688 112.4 -1.37 -1.80 0.879 47.3% — +95 — 33.3% -1.15 2–2 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 97.9 -0.32
32 2014 1948 155.3 +3.04 -2.60 0.987 49.8% -17 -179 +209 55.8% +0.15 14–3 (82%) 22–19 (54%) 109.9 +2.25 2016 1748 142.6 -0.09 -0.68 0.919 48.7% +53 — +20 42.9% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 4–8 (33%) 99.1 -0.57
33 2015 1943 158.0 +2.20 -0.75 1.029 50.3% +56 -176 +79 54.8% +0.18 12–13 (48%) 26–15 (63%) 102.1 +2.95 2017 1664 126.4 -2.04 -2.13 0.837 47.1% +89 +27 +28 35.9% -0.77 2–4 (33%) 5–6 (45%) 98.6 -0.12
34 2016 1889 154.0 +2.36 -0.30 1.055 50.8% +25 -36 +78 54.5% +0.23 10–10 (50%) 20–15 (57%) 102.4 +1.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1903 154.4 +2.94 -2.24 0.978 49.7% -97 -32 +126 51.2% +0.07 11–10 (52%) 16–15 (52%) 99.6 -1.42 2019 1665 130.0 -2.14 +0.50 0.985 50.2% +38 +16 +26 45.8% -0.21 1–3 (25%) 3–8 (27%) 94.3 +0.05
36 2018 1806 142.4 +1.63 -2.71 0.932 49.0% -27 +12 +191 44.6% -0.49 10–4 (71%) 13–9 (59%) 107.5 +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 1808 139.4 +1.43 -2.84 0.926 48.8% -26 -93 +213 47.3% -0.08 7–5 (58%) 9–13 (41%) 99.1 -1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 1756 143.9 +1.90 -3.41 0.888 48.9% +5 -63 — 40.9% -0.45 3–3 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 100.8 -1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1593 125.8 +0.90 -5.11 0.867 47.8% +32 +34 +333 36.8% -0.80 2–9 (18%) 8–7 (53%) 90.3 +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 1468 99.6 -3.78 -3.84 0.681 43.1% +58 — +305 14.3% -2.43 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.8 +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2023 1517 114.8 +0.13 -1.94 0.853 48.1% — — +211 43.8% -0.87 1–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2011 152.3 +2.42 -2.62 0.953 49.3% -16 -72 +109 49.9% -0.11 186–158 (54%) 319–269 (54%) 107.2 -0.72 — 2069 152.5 +1.24 +0.04 1.011 50.2% +11 -51 -1 52.0% +0.13 70–71 (50%) 118–120 (50%) 101.9 +1.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.