H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Feliciano Lopez vs Janko Tipsarevic H2H: 5-1

Feliciano Lopez holds a 5–1 lead over Janko Tipsarevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Feliciano Lopez leads 4–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Feliciano Lopez won the 2011 Shanghai Masters second round 7-6(2) 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Janko Tipsarevic
SRB Age 42 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 11, 2011* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Feliciano Lopez #28 7-6(2) 7-6(3) Janko Tipsarevic #13 Match data
Apr 12, 2011* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Feliciano Lopez #43 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) Janko Tipsarevic #37 Match data
May 28, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Janko Tipsarevic #64 6-7(9) 6-4 7-6(4) 6-3 Feliciano Lopez #30 Match data
Oct 28, 2008* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Feliciano Lopez #33 6-3 6-4 Janko Tipsarevic #45 Match data
Mar 6, 2008* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard Feliciano Lopez #41 6-3 4-6 6-4 Janko Tipsarevic #40 Match data
Aug 21, 2007* New Haven ATP 250 R64 Hard Feliciano Lopez #62 7-6(5) 7-6(2) Janko Tipsarevic #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,013 497 477 51.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Janko Tipsarevic #755 #8 3,320 2,072 245 240 50.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Feliciano Lopez Janko Tipsarevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0 2003 1–2 33.3% #161 1,565 0 0
20 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,699 0 0 2004 2–7 22.2% #117 1,551 0 0
21 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,841 0 0 2005 7–15 31.8% #139 1,543 0 0
22 2004 30–24 55.6% #25 1,833 0 1 2006 8–17 32.0% #64 1,556 0 0
23 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1 2007 17–21 44.7% #52 1,735 0 0
24 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,676 0 1 2008 24–21 53.3% #49 1,727 0 0
25 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,804 0 1 2009 26–23 53.1% #38 1,818 0 0
26 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,829 0 1 2010 22–22 50.0% #49 1,807 0 0
27 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,724 0 1 2011 49–24 67.1% #9 2,006 0 2
28 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,807 0 2 2012 48–26 64.9% #9 1,972 0 3
29 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2 2013 19–22 46.3% #36 1,778 0 4
30 2012 24–26 48.0% #40 1,844 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3 2015 3–7 30.0% #410 1,693 0 4
32 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,950 0 4 2016 7–10 41.2% #144 1,748 0 4
33 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,943 0 4 2017 5–12 29.4% #105 1,666 0 4
34 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,890 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,900 0 6 2019 7–11 38.9% #219 1,665 0 4
36 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,817 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,824 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,763 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,595 0 7 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7 — — — — — — —
41 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7 — — — — — — —