H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Feliciano Lopez vs Juan Monaco H2H: 4-3

Feliciano Lopez holds a 4–3 lead over Juan Monaco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Juan Monaco leads 2–1 on clay, while Feliciano Lopez leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Feliciano Lopez won the 2016 Chengdu fourth round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Juan Monaco
ARG Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 30, 2016* Chengdu ATP 250 R16 Hard Feliciano Lopez #27 6-3 7-5 Juan Monaco #93 Match data
Apr 9, 2016* Houston ATP 250 SF Clay Juan Monaco #148 6-4 6-2 Feliciano Lopez #24 Match data
Jun 20, 2013* Eastbourne ATP 250 R16 Grass Feliciano Lopez #39 6-4 6-4 Juan Monaco #20 Match data
Apr 28, 2011* Belgrade ATP 250 R32 Clay Feliciano Lopez #37 6-4 7-5 Juan Monaco #38 Match data
May 12, 2009* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Juan Monaco #47 6-4 7-5 Feliciano Lopez #32 Match data
Aug 15, 2007* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Juan Monaco #25 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 Feliciano Lopez #64 Match data
Oct 12, 2006* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Feliciano Lopez #81 2-1 (ret.) Juan Monaco #72 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,013 497 477 51.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Juan Monaco #226 #10 2,775 2,046 319 256 55.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Feliciano Lopez Juan Monaco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,699 0 0 2004 16–12 57.1% #73 1,661 0 0
21 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,841 0 0 2005 18–25 41.9% #85 1,587 0 0
22 2004 30–24 55.6% #25 1,833 0 1 2006 18–23 43.9% #69 1,641 0 0
23 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1 2007 41–19 68.3% #23 1,864 0 3
24 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,676 0 1 2008 27–20 57.4% #46 1,768 0 3
25 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,804 0 1 2009 34–24 58.6% #30 1,850 0 3
26 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,829 0 1 2010 28–18 60.9% #26 1,838 0 3
27 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,724 0 1 2011 26–24 52.0% #26 1,932 0 3
28 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,807 0 2 2012 36–17 67.9% #12 1,944 0 7
29 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2 2013 18–21 46.2% #42 1,809 0 7
30 2012 24–26 48.0% #40 1,844 0 2 2014 20–18 52.6% #62 1,856 0 7
31 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3 2015 21–19 52.5% #53 1,811 0 7
32 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,950 0 4 2016 16–13 55.2% #65 1,864 0 8
33 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,943 0 4 2017 0–3 0.0% #226 1,805 0 8
34 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,890 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,900 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,817 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,824 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,763 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,595 0 7 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7 — — — — — — —
41 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7 — — — — — — —