H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Feliciano Lopez vs Julien Benneteau H2H: 4-5

Julien Benneteau holds a 5–4 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Julien Benneteau leads 5–2 on hard courts, while Feliciano Lopez leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Feliciano Lopez won the 2017 Montpellier third round 6-3 4-6 7-6(0).

ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 5
9 main draw meetings
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 9, 2017* Montpellier ATP 250 R32 Hard Feliciano Lopez #32 6-3 4-6 7-6(0) Julien Benneteau #128 Match data
Aug 12, 2016* Los Cabos ATP 250 QF Hard Feliciano Lopez #18 6-3 6-4 Julien Benneteau #361 Match data
Mar 13, 2014* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Julien Benneteau #65 6-3 7-6(4) Feliciano Lopez #37 Match data
Oct 24, 2013* Valencia ATP 250 R32 Hard Julien Benneteau #33 6-3 6-1 Feliciano Lopez #30 Match data
Jun 13, 2013* Queen's Club ATP 500 R32 Grass Feliciano Lopez #39 7-6(5) 6-4 Julien Benneteau #32 Match data
Jan 13, 2012* Sydney ATP 250 R16 Hard Julien Benneteau #49 6-3 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #19 Match data
Mar 12, 2011* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Julien Benneteau #82 6-4 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #41 Match data
Jun 11, 2010* Queen's Club ATP 500 R16 Grass Feliciano Lopez #31 6-2 6-4 Julien Benneteau #38 Match data
Feb 12, 2009* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Julien Benneteau #50 6-4 5-7 6-2 Feliciano Lopez #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,013 497 477 51.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Julien Benneteau #140 #25 1,608 1,955 269 292 48.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Feliciano Lopez Julien Benneteau
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #271 1,495 0 0
20 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,699 0 0 2002 0–2 0.0% #253 1,452 0 0
21 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,841 0 0 2003 3–7 30.0% #138 1,547 0 0
22 2004 30–24 55.6% #25 1,833 0 1 2004 14–15 48.3% #65 1,637 0 0
23 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1 2005 5–18 21.7% #165 1,533 0 0
24 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,676 0 1 2006 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0
25 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,804 0 1 2007 22–28 44.0% #68 1,672 0 0
26 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,829 0 1 2008 22–20 52.4% #43 1,786 0 0
27 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,724 0 1 2009 26–28 48.1% #46 1,793 0 0
28 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,807 0 2 2010 24–19 55.8% #44 1,853 0 0
29 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2 2011 21–21 50.0% #52 1,871 0 0
30 2012 24–26 48.0% #40 1,844 0 2 2012 26–21 55.3% #35 1,874 0 0
31 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3 2013 27–25 51.9% #35 1,861 0 0
32 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,950 0 4 2014 25–22 53.2% #25 1,895 0 0
33 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,943 0 4 2015 1–5 16.7% #527 1,801 0 0
34 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,890 0 5 2016 7–14 33.3% #130 1,807 0 0
35 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,900 0 6 2017 13–13 50.0% #56 1,862 0 0
36 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,817 0 6 2018 8–11 42.1% #140 1,806 0 0
37 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,824 0 7
38 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,763 0 7
39 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,595 0 7
40 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7