H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Feliciano Lopez vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 1-4

Marcos Baghdatis holds a 4–1 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Marcos Baghdatis leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Feliciano Lopez leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2016 Dubai semifinal 3-6 7-6(1) 6-1.

ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 12, 2018* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 Q1 Q Hard Marcos Baghdatis #93 7-6(5) 6-3 Feliciano Lopez #71 Match data
Feb 27, 2016* Dubai ATP 500 SF Hard Marcos Baghdatis #57 3-6 7-6(1) 6-1 Feliciano Lopez #24 Match data
Mar 11, 2012* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #47 6-3 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #15 Match data
Feb 11, 2011* Rotterdam ATP 500 R16 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #20 7-6(3) 6-3 Feliciano Lopez #44 Match data
Jul 1, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Feliciano Lopez #35 5-7 6-2 3-6 7-6(4) 8-6 Marcos Baghdatis #25 Match data
Jan 6, 2006* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #55 6-2 3-6 7-5 Feliciano Lopez #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,013 497 477 51.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Feliciano Lopez Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,699 0 0 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,841 0 0 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2004 30–24 55.6% #25 1,833 0 1 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,676 0 1 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,804 0 1 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,829 0 1 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,724 0 1 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,807 0 2 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2012 24–26 48.0% #40 1,844 0 2 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,950 0 4 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,943 0 4 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,890 0 5 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4
35 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,900 0 6
36 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,817 0 6
37 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,824 0 7
38 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,763 0 7
39 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,595 0 7
40 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7