H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Feliciano Lopez vs Mardy Fish H2H: 3-5

Mardy Fish holds a 5–3 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while Mardy Fish leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Feliciano Lopez won the 2015 US Open second round 2-6 6-3 1-6 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Feliciano Lopez

ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H

3 – 5

8 main draw meetings

Mardy Fish

USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Feliciano Lopez #19	2-6 6-3 1-6 7-5 6-3	Mardy Fish #581	Match data	Sep 3, 2015*	R64	US Open	Grand Slam	Hard
Mardy Fish #20	6-2 6-3	Feliciano Lopez #31	Match data	Aug 14, 2012*	R64	Cincinnati Open	Masters 1000	Hard
Mardy Fish #8	6-2 6-3	Feliciano Lopez #25	Match data	Aug 11, 2011*	R32	Canadian Open	Masters 1000	Hard
Mardy Fish #90	6-3 6-4	Feliciano Lopez #31	Match data	Jun 12, 2010*	SF	Queen's Club Championships	ATP 250	Grass
Mardy Fish #101	7-5 6-3	Feliciano Lopez #34	Match data	Mar 29, 2010*	R32	Miami Open	Masters 1000	Hard
Mardy Fish #25	6-1 6-4	Feliciano Lopez #30	Match data	Jun 12, 2009*	R16	Queen's Club Championships	ATP 250	Grass
Feliciano Lopez #39	7-6(9) 6-4	Mardy Fish #25	Match data	Oct 24, 2008*	R16	Swiss Indoors	International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250	Hard
Feliciano Lopez #74	7-6(3) 6-4	Mardy Fish #88	Match data	Oct 3, 2002*	R32	Japan Open	ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500	Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Feliciano Lopez	#672	#12	2,415	2,010	501	479	51.1%	0	0	0	3	4	7
Mardy Fish	#619	#7	3,060	2,116	295	212	58.2%	0	0	0	0	6	6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Feliciano Lopez							Mardy Fish
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
16	1998	0–1	0.0%	#546	1,491	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	2000	0–1	0.0%	#271	1,480	0	0	2000	3–4	42.9%	#305	1,524	0	0
19	2001	2–5	28.6%	#159	1,520	0	0	2001	5–8	38.5%	#141	1,542	0	0
20	2002	18–16	52.9%	#62	1,697	0	0	2002	11–11	50.0%	#84	1,630	0	0
21	2003	34–31	52.3%	#28	1,840	0	0	2003	38–23	62.3%	#20	1,841	0	1
22	2004	32–25	56.1%	#25	1,842	0	1	2004	26–18	59.1%	#37	1,760	0	1
23	2005	31–26	54.4%	#33	1,759	0	1	2005	6–11	35.3%	#225	1,640	0	1
24	2006	19–28	40.4%	#79	1,675	0	1	2006	23–18	56.1%	#47	1,726	0	2
25	2007	27–24	52.9%	#35	1,803	0	1	2007	24–21	53.3%	#39	1,755	0	2
26	2008	23–24	48.9%	#30	1,832	0	1	2008	32–23	58.2%	#24	1,860	0	2
27	2009	17–23	42.5%	#47	1,725	0	1	2009	21–17	55.3%	#55	1,815	0	3
28	2010	27–23	54.0%	#32	1,801	0	2	2010	38–15	71.7%	#16	2,023	0	5
29	2011	35–25	58.3%	#20	1,968	0	2	2011	42–22	65.6%	#8	2,012	0	6
30	2012	26–27	49.1%	#40	1,857	0	2	2012	20–12	62.5%	#27	2,012	0	6
31	2013	30–20	60.0%	#28	1,914	0	3	2013	4–5	44.4%	#373	1,935	0	6
32	2014	40–25	61.5%	#14	1,947	0	4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2015	32–26	55.2%	#17	1,942	0	4	2015	2–4	33.3%	#423	1,885	0	6
34	2016	29–24	54.7%	#28	1,888	0	5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	2017	25–24	51.0%	#36	1,902	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	2018	22–21	51.2%	#64	1,806	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	2019	13–15	46.4%	#62	1,807	0	7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
38	2020	7–10	41.2%	#64	1,756	0	7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
39	2021	9–20	31.0%	#106	1,593	0	7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
40	2022	0–11	0.0%	#830	1,468	0	7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
41	2023	3–4	42.9%	#468	1,517	0	7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Feliciano Lopez																	Mardy Fish
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
16	1998	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	2000	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2000	1	3	4	25.0%	—	—	—	—	2	1	3	66.7%	—	—	—	—
19	2001	—	—	—	—	2	5	7	28.6%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2001	4	5	9	44.4%	0	1	1	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—
20	2002	11	10	21	52.4%	4	5	9	44.4%	3	1	4	75.0%	—	—	—	—	2002	8	9	17	47.1%	—	—	—	—	3	2	5	60.0%	—	—	—	—
21	2003	14	14	28	50.0%	13	10	23	56.5%	4	3	7	57.1%	3	4	7	42.9%	2003	29	12	41	70.7%	3	5	8	37.5%	6	4	10	60.0%	0	2	2	0.0%
22	2004	17	12	29	58.6%	9	8	17	52.9%	2	2	4	50.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	2004	19	13	32	59.4%	0	1	1	0.0%	5	2	7	71.4%	2	2	4	50.0%
23	2005	18	14	32	56.3%	7	8	15	46.7%	5	2	7	71.4%	1	2	3	33.3%	2005	6	9	15	40.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	2006	9	16	25	36.0%	6	7	13	46.2%	2	3	5	40.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	2006	12	14	26	46.2%	5	0	5	100.0%	5	3	8	62.5%	1	1	2	50.0%
25	2007	20	15	35	57.1%	5	6	11	45.5%	2	2	4	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	2007	22	14	36	61.1%	1	3	4	25.0%	0	3	3	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%
26	2008	17	17	34	50.0%	2	5	7	28.6%	4	2	6	66.7%	—	—	—	—	2008	26	15	41	63.4%	4	5	9	44.4%	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—
27	2009	11	15	26	42.3%	4	6	10	40.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	2009	13	10	23	56.5%	4	5	9	44.4%	4	2	6	66.7%	—	—	—	—
28	2010	15	15	30	50.0%	7	5	12	58.3%	5	3	8	62.5%	—	—	—	—	2010	25	11	36	69.4%	2	2	4	50.0%	11	2	13	84.6%	—	—	—	—
29	2011	17	15	32	53.1%	13	8	21	61.9%	5	2	7	71.4%	—	—	—	—	2011	33	17	50	66.0%	5	4	9	55.6%	4	1	5	80.0%	—	—	—	—
30	2012	15	16	31	48.4%	8	8	16	50.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	—	—	—	—	2012	17	10	27	63.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	3	1	4	75.0%	—	—	—	—
31	2013	15	13	28	53.6%	6	5	11	54.5%	9	2	11	81.8%	—	—	—	—	2013	4	5	9	44.4%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2014	22	16	38	57.9%	6	7	13	46.2%	12	2	14	85.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2015	20	14	34	58.8%	9	8	17	52.9%	3	4	7	42.9%	—	—	—	—	2015	2	4	6	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2016	16	14	30	53.3%	11	7	18	61.1%	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	2017	8	15	23	34.8%	8	7	15	53.3%	9	2	11	81.8%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	2018	12	12	24	50.0%	5	6	11	45.5%	5	3	8	62.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	2019	7	10	17	41.2%	0	3	3	0.0%	6	2	8	75.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
38	2020	5	8	13	38.5%	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
39	2021	2	10	12	16.7%	3	6	9	33.3%	4	4	8	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
40	2022	0	5	5	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	0	4	4	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
41	2023	1	1	2	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	272	277	549	49.5%	130	137	267	48.7%	89	53	142	62.7%	10	12	22	45.5%	—	221	151	372	59.4%	24	29	53	45.3%	46	26	72	63.9%	4	6	10	40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 957/979 of Feliciano Lopez's and 452/465 of Mardy Fish's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age	Feliciano Lopez											Mardy Fish
Age	Yr	Sample	Aces/M	DFs/M	1st Sv%	1st Pts%	2nd Pts%	BP Saved%	BP Conv%	Svc Pts%	Ret Pts%	Yr	Sample	Aces/M	DFs/M	1st Sv%	1st Pts%	2nd Pts%	BP Saved%	BP Conv%	Svc Pts%	Ret Pts%
16	1998	1/1	0.0	0.0	73.0%	37.0%	50.0%	28.6%	0.0%	40.5%	34.0%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	2001	7/7	5.6	2.9	59.3%	66.9%	49.1%	54.8%	43.7%	59.4%	35.1%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	2002	30/34	9.7	4.3	60.4%	73.0%	48.8%	58.0%	42.1%	63.4%	30.5%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	2003	61/65	8.1	3.3	58.2%	74.6%	52.4%	67.5%	43.8%	65.3%	33.3%	2003	58/61	11.0	3.9	53.4%	80.0%	52.0%	64.2%	39.2%	67.0%	35.1%
22	2004	54/57	10.3	3.6	57.2%	77.2%	51.9%	62.9%	40.9%	66.4%	32.3%	2004	38/44	11.1	4.1	55.1%	77.2%	50.8%	65.1%	42.1%	65.4%	35.2%
23	2005	57/57	8.6	3.3	59.8%	75.5%	50.0%	64.7%	36.1%	65.3%	32.9%	2005	17/17	10.3	3.4	53.9%	72.8%	46.5%	53.7%	34.0%	60.9%	34.2%
24	2006	47/47	9.9	3.6	57.2%	75.3%	48.3%	55.3%	36.9%	63.9%	33.4%	2006	40/41	9.5	3.1	51.8%	78.8%	53.9%	68.1%	43.9%	66.5%	37.5%
25	2007	51/51	10.0	3.5	59.7%	75.5%	52.4%	57.9%	40.5%	66.1%	32.9%	2007	45/45	11.4	2.7	52.2%	80.1%	52.1%	55.7%	42.6%	66.5%	35.7%
26	2008	47/47	11.8	3.2	60.1%	75.7%	54.2%	66.9%	41.9%	66.9%	32.1%	2008	55/55	10.1	2.7	49.3%	77.9%	51.8%	57.6%	39.2%	64.6%	36.6%
27	2009	39/40	9.7	2.7	59.1%	73.5%	50.3%	61.4%	41.0%	64.2%	32.2%	2009	37/38	11.0	2.3	56.9%	77.1%	53.3%	58.2%	44.0%	66.6%	36.9%
28	2010	49/50	10.5	3.3	57.4%	77.3%	50.8%	63.1%	37.8%	65.9%	32.3%	2010	52/53	10.9	2.3	55.3%	79.7%	54.6%	62.1%	49.8%	68.5%	38.1%
29	2011	60/60	12.2	3.7	57.6%	77.2%	53.7%	64.7%	36.4%	67.2%	32.7%	2011	64/64	7.6	1.7	58.4%	76.7%	55.4%	64.9%	44.7%	67.7%	39.4%
30	2012	50/53	9.9	3.4	56.6%	76.1%	51.1%	66.1%	38.5%	65.3%	32.4%	2012	31/32	9.7	2.5	52.2%	77.9%	55.4%	68.6%	51.3%	67.1%	39.8%
31	2013	49/50	11.1	3.6	58.9%	74.8%	53.2%	68.2%	39.1%	66.2%	33.8%	2013	9/9	5.8	3.1	49.6%	75.7%	47.6%	45.0%	44.4%	61.2%	37.2%
32	2014	64/65	10.0	3.1	59.5%	77.2%	52.4%	64.0%	36.1%	67.2%	32.4%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2015	58/58	12.7	3.6	57.3%	76.5%	53.6%	66.4%	33.4%	66.8%	34.1%	2015	6/6	8.3	3.8	52.2%	75.4%	46.3%	54.9%	43.2%	61.5%	40.9%
34	2016	53/53	11.0	3.2	57.8%	77.8%	51.5%	63.1%	38.5%	66.5%	35.4%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	2017	48/49	10.8	2.9	59.5%	77.0%	51.4%	64.1%	38.3%	66.5%	32.8%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	2018	42/43	11.8	3.1	60.9%	76.5%	48.6%	63.3%	39.5%	65.4%	32.2%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	2019	26/28	12.9	4.2	56.7%	76.5%	51.9%	66.8%	36.0%	66.0%	31.5%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
38	2020	17/17	14.2	5.1	53.7%	79.3%	47.9%	70.8%	37.0%	64.8%	31.2%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
39	2021	29/29	10.4	4.8	55.1%	77.3%	50.8%	53.0%	43.1%	65.2%	30.2%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
40	2022	11/11	9.4	5.6	51.6%	74.1%	39.5%	56.6%	18.7%	57.1%	29.2%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
41	2023	7/7	10.4	4.4	54.3%	76.6%	52.7%	65.7%	26.4%	65.9%	29.1%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	957/980	10.5	3.5	58.2%	76.0%	51.4%	63.4%	38.4%	65.7%	32.7%	—	452/507	10.0	2.8	53.9%	78.1%	52.8%	61.7%	43.4%	66.3%	37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Feliciano Lopez																Mardy Fish
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
16	1998	1491	95.8	+0.71	-0.39	0.571	36.7%	—	—	—	0.0%	-5.00	—	—	—	-0.03	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	2000	1480	100.5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.50	—	—	—	+0.09	2000	1524	106.9	—	—	—	—	-10	—	+79	35.3%	-1.29	2–1 (67%)	0–2	—	+0.29
19	2001	1520	116.2	-0.46	-2.22	0.863	47.5%	—	+31	—	38.9%	-0.78	0–3 (0%)	3–1 (75%)	—	+0.17	2001	1543	124.2	—	—	—	—	+34	—	+26	37.8%	-0.54	5–4 (56%)	0–4 (0%)	—	-0.58
20	2002	1698	127.3	+1.48	-5.32	0.834	47.5%	-42	-107	-65	47.5%	-0.35	13–4 (76%)	10–8 (56%)	—	+0.51	2002	1630	123.4	—	—	—	—	+7	—	-44	47.4%	-0.32	4–3 (57%)	6–4 (60%)	—	+0.37
21	2003	1841	141.9	+3.32	-2.91	0.959	49.6%	-82	-104	-140	51.6%	-0.01	11–11 (50%)	20–17 (54%)	—	-2.29	2003	1841	146.3	+3.97	-0.87	1.064	50.8%	+36	-346	-162	57.3%	+0.28	15–8 (65%)	18–18 (50%)	—	-0.62
22	2004	1843	141.1	+3.06	-2.87	0.962	49.6%	-4	-87	-139	53.5%	+0.07	12–9 (57%)	13–16 (45%)	—	+0.64	2004	1761	139.2	+1.62	-0.32	1.019	50.7%	+14	—	-26	54.0%	+0.36	12–5 (71%)	6–11 (35%)	—	+0.83
23	2005	1760	138.7	+2.28	-3.17	0.949	49.1%	-15	-35	+85	52.0%	-0.07	13–7 (65%)	18–15 (55%)	—	-0.87	2005	1641	122.4	-1.17	-0.67	0.875	47.6%	+31	—	—	34.9%	-0.84	4–0 (100%)	2–7 (22%)	—	-0.38
24	2006	1676	133.5	+1.55	-2.92	0.925	48.9%	-40	+59	+97	41.8%	-0.47	9–9 (50%)	11–13 (46%)	—	-1.61	2006	1727	137.0	+3.82	+0.31	1.121	52.1%	-53	-159	+51	54.8%	+0.55	6–5 (55%)	5–8 (38%)	—	+0.33
25	2007	1803	144.0	+3.00	-2.42	0.971	49.7%	-12	-87	-39	52.6%	-0.04	8–10 (44%)	21–14 (60%)	—	-1.68	2007	1756	144.3	+2.76	+0.38	1.067	51.0%	+30	-208	-75	50.5%	+0.02	8–6 (57%)	11–13 (46%)	—	+0.23
26	2008	1832	150.3	+3.61	-2.59	0.970	49.7%	+8	-169	+26	50.4%	-0.12	6–10 (38%)	17–8 (68%)	—	-1.42	2008	1861	148.1	+1.58	+0.64	1.033	50.7%	+50	-274	-175	56.0%	+0.36	10–6 (63%)	10–13 (43%)	—	+0.64
27	2009	1726	141.9	+1.43	-2.88	0.900	48.4%	+26	-48	+98	47.2%	-0.30	7–11 (39%)	13–9 (59%)	—	-0.15	2009	1816	145.3	+2.33	+0.49	1.105	51.8%	+26	-197	-21	55.3%	+0.47	5–8 (38%)	7–9 (44%)	—	-0.08
28	2010	1802	148.0	+2.32	-2.85	0.948	49.5%	-6	-112	+49	50.0%	-0.03	6–2 (75%)	13–13 (50%)	—	+0.29	2010	2023	156.7	+4.21	+2.02	1.209	53.0%	+22	-393	-76	67.2%	+0.98	10–6 (63%)	20–5 (80%)	—	+0.51
29	2011	1969	161.7	+4.60	-2.41	0.997	49.9%	-64	-112	+32	55.2%	+0.10	12–10 (55%)	28–17 (62%)	—	-3.54	2011	2012	168.6	+4.73	+3.34	1.217	53.5%	+6	-303	+46	64.1%	+0.86	10–8 (56%)	14–10 (58%)	—	+1.88
30	2012	1858	151.5	+1.97	-3.28	0.934	49.0%	+2	-55	+79	48.8%	+0.13	10–5 (67%)	14–25 (36%)	—	-1.11	2012	2013	152.5	+3.05	+2.62	1.209	53.3%	+23	—	+55	61.5%	+0.88	5–2 (71%)	8–8 (50%)	—	+2.93
31	2013	1915	149.8	+2.60	-1.97	0.997	50.1%	-40	-64	+140	53.7%	+0.07	9–6 (60%)	14–10 (58%)	—	-0.06	2013	1936	131.0	-1.70	+0.61	0.959	49.0%	+18	—	—	45.0%	-0.10	3–1 (75%)	0–3 (0%)	—	-0.20
32	2014	1948	155.3	+3.04	-2.60	0.987	49.8%	-17	-179	+209	55.8%	+0.15	14–3 (82%)	22–19 (54%)	—	+2.25	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2015	1943	158.0	+2.20	-0.75	1.029	50.3%	+56	-176	+79	54.8%	+0.18	12–13 (48%)	26–15 (63%)	—	+2.95	2015	1885	133.8	-0.64	+1.74	1.060	51.0%	+16	—	—	44.4%	+0.61	0–2	0–3 (0%)	—	-0.26
34	2016	1889	154.0	+2.36	-0.30	1.055	50.8%	+25	-36	+78	54.5%	+0.23	10–10 (50%)	20–15 (57%)	—	+1.68	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	2017	1903	154.4	+2.94	-2.24	0.978	49.7%	-97	-32	+126	51.2%	+0.07	11–10 (52%)	16–15 (52%)	—	-1.42	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	2018	1806	142.4	+1.63	-2.71	0.932	49.0%	-27	+12	+191	44.6%	-0.49	10–4 (71%)	13–9 (59%)	—	+0.44	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	2019	1808	139.4	+1.43	-2.84	0.926	48.8%	-26	-93	+213	47.3%	-0.08	7–5 (58%)	9–13 (41%)	—	-1.25	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
38	2020	1756	143.9	+1.90	-3.41	0.888	48.9%	+5	-63	—	40.9%	-0.45	3–3 (50%)	5–5 (50%)	—	-1.13	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
39	2021	1593	125.8	+0.90	-5.11	0.867	47.8%	+32	+34	+333	36.8%	-0.80	2–9 (18%)	8–7 (53%)	—	+0.52	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
40	2022	1468	99.6	-3.78	-3.84	0.681	43.1%	+58	—	+305	14.3%	-2.43	0–3 (0%)	2–2 (50%)	—	+0.10	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
41	2023	1517	114.8	+0.13	-1.94	0.853	48.1%	—	—	+211	43.8%	-0.87	1–1	3–3 (50%)	—	-0.06	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	2011	152.3	+2.42	-2.62	0.953	49.3%	-16	-72	+109	49.9%	-0.11	186–158 (54%)	319–269 (54%)	107.2	-0.72	—	2116	154.2	+2.92	+0.94	1.100	51.7%	+19	-269	-43	55.6%	+0.38	99–65 (60%)	107–118 (48%)	103.9	+1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Feliciano Lopez's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
David Ferrer	8	11	19	Jun 1, 2017	H2H
Rafael Nadal	4	10	14	Nov 5, 2020	H2H
Tomas Berdych	8	6	14	Mar 9, 2019	H2H
Roger Federer	0	13	13	Sep 3, 2017	H2H
Ivo Karlovic	4	7	11	May 28, 2019	H2H

Mardy Fish's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Andy Roddick	3	9	12	Aug 21, 2010	H2H
Roger Federer	1	9	10	Sep 4, 2012	H2H
Andy Murray	4	5	9	Aug 19, 2015	H2H
Rafael Nadal	1	8	9	Nov 20, 2011	H2H
Feliciano Lopez	5	3	8	Sep 3, 2015	H2H