H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Feliciano Lopez vs Markus Hipfl H2H: 0-1

Markus Hipfl holds a 1–0 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Markus Hipfl leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Markus Hipfl won the 2001 Stuttgart Open round of 64 7-6(4) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Markus Hipfl
AUT Age 48 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Markus Hipfl #101 7-6(4) 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #214 Match data Jul 18, 2001* R64 Stuttgart Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,010 501 479 51.1% 0 0 0 3 4 7
Markus Hipfl #1,538 #63 678 1,686 55 78 41.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Feliciano Lopez Markus Hipfl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #768 1,491 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #1275 1,485 0 0
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0 1996 1–2 33.3% #451 1,493 0 0
19 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0 1997 0–2 0.0% #231 1,462 0 0
20 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,697 0 0 1998 3–3 50.0% #137 1,507 0 0
21 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,840 0 0 1999 15–15 50.0% #76 1,591 0 0
22 2004 32–25 56.1% #25 1,842 0 1 2000 8–12 40.0% #119 1,571 0 0
23 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1 2001 14–18 43.8% #76 1,574 0 0
24 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,675 0 1 2002 11–17 39.3% #125 1,566 0 0
25 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,803 0 1 2003 3–6 33.3% #279 1,509 0 0
26 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,832 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,725 0 1 2005 0–1 0.0% #1102 1,476 0 0
28 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,801 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2012 26–27 49.1% #40 1,857 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,947 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,942 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,888 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,902 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,806 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,807 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,756 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,593 0 7 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7 — — — — — — —
41 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Feliciano Lopez Markus Hipfl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2001 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2002 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1998 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2003 14 14 28 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2004 17 12 29 58.6% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2000 1 4 5 20.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2005 18 14 32 56.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2001 0 5 5 0.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2006 9 16 25 36.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 3 4 7 42.9% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2007 20 15 35 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 2008 17 17 34 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 15 15 30 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 17 15 32 53.1% 13 8 21 61.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 15 16 31 48.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 22 16 38 57.9% 6 7 13 46.2% 12 2 14 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 20 14 34 58.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 16 14 30 53.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 8 15 23 34.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 12 12 24 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 7 10 17 41.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 2 10 12 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 272 277 549 49.5% 130 137 267 48.7% 89 53 142 62.7% 10 12 22 45.5% — 5 17 22 22.7% 49 53 102 48.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 957/979 of Feliciano Lopez's and 116/133 of Markus Hipfl's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Feliciano Lopez Markus Hipfl
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 1998 1/1 0.0 0.0 73.0% 37.0% 50.0% 28.6% 0.0% 40.5% 34.0% 1994 1/1 1.0 6.0 66.2% 57.8% 39.1% 71.4% 0.0% 51.5% 27.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 1/1 2.0 6.0 49.1% 51.9% 39.3% 16.7% 20.0% 45.5% 34.5%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 3/3 1.7 4.3 43.0% 62.8% 49.0% 60.8% 40.6% 54.8% 40.5%
19 2001 7/7 5.6 2.9 59.3% 66.9% 49.1% 54.8% 43.7% 59.4% 35.1% 1997 1/2 1.0 2.0 50.9% 62.1% 44.6% 50.0% 80.0% 53.5% 46.3%
20 2002 30/34 9.7 4.3 60.4% 73.0% 48.8% 58.0% 42.1% 63.4% 30.5% 1998 5/6 2.4 1.6 67.6% 60.0% 50.6% 51.0% 33.6% 56.7% 38.8%
21 2003 61/65 8.1 3.3 58.2% 74.6% 52.4% 67.5% 43.8% 65.3% 33.3% 1999 26/30 2.3 1.8 66.3% 66.5% 49.6% 37.2% 42.6% 61.0% 42.0%
22 2004 54/57 10.3 3.6 57.2% 77.2% 51.9% 62.9% 40.9% 66.4% 32.3% 2000 16/20 2.1 2.2 64.6% 64.9% 50.9% 54.0% 52.2% 59.7% 39.1%
23 2005 57/57 8.6 3.3 59.8% 75.5% 50.0% 64.7% 36.1% 65.3% 32.9% 2001 26/32 2.1 2.9 61.4% 63.6% 48.6% 51.5% 38.5% 58.1% 39.9%
24 2006 47/47 9.9 3.6 57.2% 75.3% 48.3% 55.3% 36.9% 63.9% 33.4% 2002 27/28 3.3 2.2 65.1% 63.3% 50.1% 50.8% 46.7% 58.2% 39.0%
25 2007 51/51 10.0 3.5 59.7% 75.5% 52.4% 57.9% 40.5% 66.1% 32.9% 2003 9/9 0.9 1.9 71.7% 56.3% 41.2% 46.4% 38.4% 52.0% 33.3%
26 2008 47/47 11.8 3.2 60.1% 75.7% 54.2% 66.9% 41.9% 66.9% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 39/40 9.7 2.7 59.1% 73.5% 50.3% 61.4% 41.0% 64.2% 32.2% 2005 1/1 3.0 4.0 63.1% 60.4% 48.4% 71.4% 40.0% 56.0% 39.0%
28 2010 49/50 10.5 3.3 57.4% 77.3% 50.8% 63.1% 37.8% 65.9% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 60/60 12.2 3.7 57.6% 77.2% 53.7% 64.7% 36.4% 67.2% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 50/53 9.9 3.4 56.6% 76.1% 51.1% 66.1% 38.5% 65.3% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 49/50 11.1 3.6 58.9% 74.8% 53.2% 68.2% 39.1% 66.2% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 64/65 10.0 3.1 59.5% 77.2% 52.4% 64.0% 36.1% 67.2% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 58/58 12.7 3.6 57.3% 76.5% 53.6% 66.4% 33.4% 66.8% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 53/53 11.0 3.2 57.8% 77.8% 51.5% 63.1% 38.5% 66.5% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 48/49 10.8 2.9 59.5% 77.0% 51.4% 64.1% 38.3% 66.5% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 42/43 11.8 3.1 60.9% 76.5% 48.6% 63.3% 39.5% 65.4% 32.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 26/28 12.9 4.2 56.7% 76.5% 51.9% 66.8% 36.0% 66.0% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 17/17 14.2 5.1 53.7% 79.3% 47.9% 70.8% 37.0% 64.8% 31.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 29/29 10.4 4.8 55.1% 77.3% 50.8% 53.0% 43.1% 65.2% 30.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 11/11 9.4 5.6 51.6% 74.1% 39.5% 56.6% 18.7% 57.1% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
41 2023 7/7 10.4 4.4 54.3% 76.6% 52.7% 65.7% 26.4% 65.9% 29.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 957/980 10.5 3.5 58.2% 76.0% 51.4% 63.4% 38.4% 65.7% 32.7% — 116/133 2.3 2.4 64.2% 63.4% 48.8% 48.3% 42.9% 58.2% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Feliciano Lopez Markus Hipfl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1998 1491 95.8 +0.71 -0.39 0.571 36.7% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.03 1994 1491 99.9 +1.43 -2.60 0.570 41.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1485 101.0 +0.52 +1.20 0.633 40.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.11
18 2000 1480 100.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09 1996 1493 109.0 -1.54 +0.61 0.895 47.2% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.24
19 2001 1520 116.2 -0.46 -2.22 0.863 47.5% — +31 — 38.9% -0.78 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.17 1997 1462 98.2 -0.14 -2.54 0.995 49.8% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — +0.24
20 2002 1698 127.3 +1.48 -5.32 0.834 47.5% -42 -107 -65 47.5% -0.35 13–4 (76%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.51 1998 1508 114.6 -0.71 +0.31 0.894 47.3% — +41 — 46.7% -0.40 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.23
21 2003 1841 141.9 +3.32 -2.91 0.959 49.6% -82 -104 -140 51.6% -0.01 11–11 (50%) 20–17 (54%) — -2.29 1999 1591 128.5 -0.84 +2.00 1.075 50.9% -78 +74 — 52.6% +0.26 2–6 (25%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.06
22 2004 1843 141.1 +3.06 -2.87 0.962 49.6% -4 -87 -139 53.5% +0.07 12–9 (57%) 13–16 (45%) — +0.64 2000 1571 126.9 -1.56 +0.32 0.972 49.4% -93 +109 — 43.1% -0.69 3–4 (43%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.49
23 2005 1760 138.7 +2.28 -3.17 0.949 49.1% -15 -35 +85 52.0% -0.07 13–7 (65%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.87 2001 1574 134.5 -2.21 +1.33 0.953 49.0% -129 +138 -96 48.6% -0.18 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — -1.27
24 2006 1676 133.5 +1.55 -2.92 0.925 48.9% -40 +59 +97 41.8% -0.47 9–9 (50%) 11–13 (46%) — -1.61 2002 1567 127.4 -2.40 +0.71 0.934 48.7% -69 +91 — 47.1% -0.21 0–7 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.81
25 2007 1803 144.0 +3.00 -2.42 0.971 49.7% -12 -87 -39 52.6% -0.04 8–10 (44%) 21–14 (60%) — -1.68 2003 1509 95.1 -5.51 -3.56 0.693 43.6% — +73 — 33.3% -2.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.38
26 2008 1832 150.3 +3.61 -2.59 0.970 49.7% +8 -169 +26 50.4% -0.12 6–10 (38%) 17–8 (68%) — -1.42 2004 1495 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 1726 141.9 +1.43 -2.88 0.900 48.4% +26 -48 +98 47.2% -0.30 7–11 (39%) 13–9 (59%) — -0.15 2005 1477 99.0 +0.24 -0.09 0.886 47.6% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.22
28 2010 1802 148.0 +2.32 -2.85 0.948 49.5% -6 -112 +49 50.0% -0.03 6–2 (75%) 13–13 (50%) — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1969 161.7 +4.60 -2.41 0.997 49.9% -64 -112 +32 55.2% +0.10 12–10 (55%) 28–17 (62%) — -3.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1858 151.5 +1.97 -3.28 0.934 49.0% +2 -55 +79 48.8% +0.13 10–5 (67%) 14–25 (36%) — -1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1915 149.8 +2.60 -1.97 0.997 50.1% -40 -64 +140 53.7% +0.07 9–6 (60%) 14–10 (58%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1948 155.3 +3.04 -2.60 0.987 49.8% -17 -179 +209 55.8% +0.15 14–3 (82%) 22–19 (54%) — +2.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1943 158.0 +2.20 -0.75 1.029 50.3% +56 -176 +79 54.8% +0.18 12–13 (48%) 26–15 (63%) — +2.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1889 154.0 +2.36 -0.30 1.055 50.8% +25 -36 +78 54.5% +0.23 10–10 (50%) 20–15 (57%) — +1.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1903 154.4 +2.94 -2.24 0.978 49.7% -97 -32 +126 51.2% +0.07 11–10 (52%) 16–15 (52%) — -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1806 142.4 +1.63 -2.71 0.932 49.0% -27 +12 +191 44.6% -0.49 10–4 (71%) 13–9 (59%) — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 1808 139.4 +1.43 -2.84 0.926 48.8% -26 -93 +213 47.3% -0.08 7–5 (58%) 9–13 (41%) — -1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 1756 143.9 +1.90 -3.41 0.888 48.9% +5 -63 — 40.9% -0.45 3–3 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1593 125.8 +0.90 -5.11 0.867 47.8% +32 +34 +333 36.8% -0.80 2–9 (18%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 1468 99.6 -3.78 -3.84 0.681 43.1% +58 — +305 14.3% -2.43 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2023 1517 114.8 +0.13 -1.94 0.853 48.1% — — +211 43.8% -0.87 1–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2011 152.3 +2.42 -2.62 0.953 49.3% -16 -72 +109 49.9% -0.11 186–158 (54%) 319–269 (54%) 107.2 -0.72 — 1687 129.6 -1.94 +0.67 0.942 48.7% -90 +96 -96 46.1% -0.38 13–27 (33%) 17–14 (55%) 95.8 +0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.