H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Feliciano Lopez vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 0-1

Nicolas Kiefer holds a 1–0 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Kiefer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 2003 Halle Open round of 16 6-1 3-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Kiefer #73 6-1 3-6 7-5 Feliciano Lopez #54 Match data Jun 13, 2003* R16 Halle Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,010 501 479 51.1% 0 0 0 3 4 7
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,995 347 255 57.6% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Feliciano Lopez Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,563 0 0
19 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,799 0 1
20 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,697 0 0 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,792 0 1
21 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,840 0 0 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,922 0 4
22 2004 32–25 56.1% #25 1,842 0 1 2000 30–16 65.2% #20 1,900 0 6
23 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,763 0 6
24 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,675 0 1 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,717 0 6
25 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,803 0 1 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,832 0 1 2004 34–20 63.0% #21 1,886 0 6
27 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,725 0 1 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,862 0 6
28 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,801 0 2 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,863 0 6
29 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,906 0 6
30 2012 26–27 49.1% #40 1,857 0 2 2008 22–17 56.4% #38 1,889 0 6
31 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,762 0 6
32 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,947 0 4 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,722 0 6
33 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,942 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,888 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,902 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,806 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,807 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,756 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,593 0 7 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7 — — — — — — —
41 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Feliciano Lopez Nicolas Kiefer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
18 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 2001 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 1997 7 5 12 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 11 5 16 68.8%
20 2002 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1998 24 15 39 61.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 2003 14 14 28 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1999 41 15 56 73.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 2004 17 12 29 58.6% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2000 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2005 18 14 32 56.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2001 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 2006 9 16 25 36.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 10 15 25 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2007 20 15 35 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 14 11 25 56.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
26 2008 17 17 34 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2004 30 14 44 68.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2005 15 13 28 53.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
28 2010 15 15 30 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2006 8 4 12 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2011 17 15 32 53.1% 13 8 21 61.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2007 17 9 26 65.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
30 2012 15 16 31 48.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2008 12 11 23 52.2% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
31 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2009 4 7 11 36.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2014 22 16 38 57.9% 6 7 13 46.2% 12 2 14 85.7% — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 2015 20 14 34 58.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 16 14 30 53.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 8 15 23 34.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 12 12 24 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 7 10 17 41.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 2 10 12 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 272 277 549 49.5% 130 137 267 48.7% 89 53 142 62.7% 10 12 22 45.5% — 221 145 366 60.4% 47 55 102 46.1% 44 30 74 59.5% 35 25 60 58.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 957/979 of Feliciano Lopez's and 537/601 of Nicolas Kiefer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Feliciano Lopez Nicolas Kiefer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 1998 1/1 0.0 0.0 73.0% 37.0% 50.0% 28.6% 0.0% 40.5% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 6/6 4.7 2.3 61.5% 72.6% 51.3% 62.7% 44.1% 64.8% 36.3%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 11/16 6.1 2.5 52.2% 76.6% 47.8% 53.2% 49.7% 62.7% 39.8%
19 2001 7/7 5.6 2.9 59.3% 66.9% 49.1% 54.8% 43.7% 59.4% 35.1% 1997 37/42 7.9 3.5 55.2% 77.0% 48.3% 60.5% 52.5% 64.1% 36.7%
20 2002 30/34 9.7 4.3 60.4% 73.0% 48.8% 58.0% 42.1% 63.4% 30.5% 1998 49/56 6.2 4.7 53.7% 74.8% 47.8% 55.1% 44.4% 62.5% 39.0%
21 2003 61/65 8.1 3.3 58.2% 74.6% 52.4% 67.5% 43.8% 65.3% 33.3% 1999 56/74 6.6 4.3 51.5% 75.7% 53.2% 61.8% 43.5% 64.7% 40.4%
22 2004 54/57 10.3 3.6 57.2% 77.2% 51.9% 62.9% 40.9% 66.4% 32.3% 2000 38/46 6.4 4.3 52.7% 74.9% 52.3% 61.7% 48.3% 64.3% 40.1%
23 2005 57/57 8.6 3.3 59.8% 75.5% 50.0% 64.7% 36.1% 65.3% 32.9% 2001 44/51 6.3 4.1 50.3% 71.1% 48.8% 54.0% 50.7% 60.0% 40.0%
24 2006 47/47 9.9 3.6 57.2% 75.3% 48.3% 55.3% 36.9% 63.9% 33.4% 2002 40/43 6.2 4.5 52.6% 74.1% 47.8% 58.8% 50.7% 61.5% 37.6%
25 2007 51/51 10.0 3.5 59.7% 75.5% 52.4% 57.9% 40.5% 66.1% 32.9% 2003 36/36 6.5 3.8 50.8% 73.1% 49.9% 58.1% 44.7% 61.8% 37.4%
26 2008 47/47 11.8 3.2 60.1% 75.7% 54.2% 66.9% 41.9% 66.9% 32.1% 2004 51/54 7.3 3.8 54.9% 77.8% 48.4% 61.1% 41.4% 64.5% 38.7%
27 2009 39/40 9.7 2.7 59.1% 73.5% 50.3% 61.4% 41.0% 64.2% 32.2% 2005 52/53 7.6 3.8 53.4% 74.2% 51.4% 56.4% 51.3% 63.6% 40.9%
28 2010 49/50 10.5 3.3 57.4% 77.3% 50.8% 63.1% 37.8% 65.9% 32.3% 2006 21/22 7.4 4.0 51.7% 72.0% 50.1% 59.5% 43.3% 61.3% 40.2%
29 2011 60/60 12.2 3.7 57.6% 77.2% 53.7% 64.7% 36.4% 67.2% 32.7% 2007 30/31 6.7 2.5 57.0% 79.9% 51.6% 64.6% 33.9% 67.8% 38.1%
30 2012 50/53 9.9 3.4 56.6% 76.1% 51.1% 66.1% 38.5% 65.3% 32.4% 2008 34/39 7.2 2.4 53.6% 76.3% 51.9% 55.4% 44.9% 64.9% 39.6%
31 2013 49/50 11.1 3.6 58.9% 74.8% 53.2% 68.2% 39.1% 66.2% 33.8% 2009 28/28 7.7 3.9 52.0% 75.0% 47.3% 62.9% 45.8% 61.9% 35.4%
32 2014 64/65 10.0 3.1 59.5% 77.2% 52.4% 64.0% 36.1% 67.2% 32.4% 2010 4/4 11.3 6.5 51.8% 77.7% 47.3% 55.7% 31.0% 63.0% 28.6%
33 2015 58/58 12.7 3.6 57.3% 76.5% 53.6% 66.4% 33.4% 66.8% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 53/53 11.0 3.2 57.8% 77.8% 51.5% 63.1% 38.5% 66.5% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 48/49 10.8 2.9 59.5% 77.0% 51.4% 64.1% 38.3% 66.5% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 42/43 11.8 3.1 60.9% 76.5% 48.6% 63.3% 39.5% 65.4% 32.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 26/28 12.9 4.2 56.7% 76.5% 51.9% 66.8% 36.0% 66.0% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 17/17 14.2 5.1 53.7% 79.3% 47.9% 70.8% 37.0% 64.8% 31.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 29/29 10.4 4.8 55.1% 77.3% 50.8% 53.0% 43.1% 65.2% 30.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 11/11 9.4 5.6 51.6% 74.1% 39.5% 56.6% 18.7% 57.1% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
41 2023 7/7 10.4 4.4 54.3% 76.6% 52.7% 65.7% 26.4% 65.9% 29.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 957/980 10.5 3.5 58.2% 76.0% 51.4% 63.4% 38.4% 65.7% 32.7% — 537/602 6.9 3.8 53.1% 75.1% 49.9% 58.9% 46.0% 63.3% 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Feliciano Lopez Nicolas Kiefer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1998 1491 95.8 +0.71 -0.39 0.571 36.7% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.03 1994 1489 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1528 117.0 +1.19 -1.22 1.032 51.3% +26 — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 — — +0.08
18 2000 1480 100.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09 1996 1563 122.9 +0.33 +1.12 1.067 50.9% +8 -24 — 44.1% +0.09 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.80
19 2001 1520 116.2 -0.46 -2.22 0.863 47.5% — +31 — 38.9% -0.78 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 98.5 +0.17 1997 1799 139.8 +1.52 -0.54 1.021 50.8% -25 -229 -48 55.6% +0.30 14–3 (82%) 8–7 (53%) 112.8 +0.64
20 2002 1698 127.3 +1.48 -5.32 0.834 47.5% -42 -107 -65 47.5% -0.35 13–4 (76%) 10–8 (56%) 114.4 +0.51 1998 1792 151.1 +0.77 +1.69 1.039 50.9% +29 -161 -60 55.6% +0.37 10–11 (48%) 12–8 (60%) 100.3 -0.30
21 2003 1841 141.9 +3.32 -2.91 0.959 49.6% -82 -104 -140 51.6% -0.01 11–11 (50%) 20–17 (54%) 105.0 -2.29 1999 1923 157.7 +2.57 +3.33 1.144 52.6% +23 -302 -126 65.4% +0.99 15–6 (71%) 16–8 (67%) 110.9 +0.49
22 2004 1843 141.1 +3.06 -2.87 0.962 49.6% -4 -87 -139 53.5% +0.07 12–9 (57%) 13–16 (45%) 100.2 +0.64 2000 1900 146.0 +2.09 +2.25 1.124 52.3% +54 -332 -120 61.3% +0.85 9–2 (82%) 7–6 (54%) 104.4 -0.03
23 2005 1760 138.7 +2.28 -3.17 0.949 49.1% -15 -35 +85 52.0% -0.07 13–7 (65%) 18–15 (55%) 103.7 -0.87 2001 1763 149.2 -1.17 +2.22 1.001 50.2% +25 -132 +43 53.5% +0.24 6–10 (38%) 7–5 (58%) 97.2 -2.55
24 2006 1676 133.5 +1.55 -2.92 0.925 48.9% -40 +59 +97 41.8% -0.47 9–9 (50%) 11–13 (46%) 98.3 -1.61 2002 1718 142.5 -0.77 +1.14 0.977 49.8% +5 -139 +119 46.5% -0.05 4–4 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.4 -0.90
25 2007 1803 144.0 +3.00 -2.42 0.971 49.7% -12 -87 -39 52.6% -0.04 8–10 (44%) 21–14 (60%) 104.0 -1.68 2003 1727 134.5 +0.10 +0.13 0.980 49.8% +22 -144 +93 48.1% -0.22 6–1 (86%) 3–3 (50%) 106.1 +0.36
26 2008 1832 150.3 +3.61 -2.59 0.970 49.7% +8 -169 +26 50.4% -0.12 6–10 (38%) 17–8 (68%) 103.6 -1.42 2004 1887 148.7 +1.38 +2.62 1.092 51.5% +33 -284 -100 60.2% +0.52 12–6 (67%) 14–7 (67%) 109.1 +0.23
27 2009 1726 141.9 +1.43 -2.88 0.900 48.4% +26 -48 +98 47.2% -0.30 7–11 (39%) 13–9 (59%) 100.2 -0.15 2005 1862 154.9 +1.31 +3.44 1.125 52.2% +10 -139 -50 60.9% +0.77 8–8 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 100.4 -1.12
28 2010 1802 148.0 +2.32 -2.85 0.948 49.5% -6 -112 +49 50.0% -0.03 6–2 (75%) 13–13 (50%) 104.4 +0.29 2006 1863 140.5 -0.75 +2.34 1.039 50.6% +65 -104 — 60.0% +0.60 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 106.1 +0.78
29 2011 1969 161.7 +4.60 -2.41 0.997 49.9% -64 -112 +32 55.2% +0.10 12–10 (55%) 28–17 (62%) 111.3 -3.54 2007 1907 153.1 +4.21 +1.95 1.186 52.7% +55 — -153 65.2% +0.94 1–1 8–5 (62%) — -1.12
30 2012 1858 151.5 +1.97 -3.28 0.934 49.0% +2 -55 +79 48.8% +0.13 10–5 (67%) 14–25 (36%) 96.1 -1.11 2008 1889 153.4 +2.15 +3.22 1.128 51.9% +5 -79 -37 57.0% +0.37 7–5 (58%) 7–4 (64%) 102.3 -1.13
31 2013 1915 149.8 +2.60 -1.97 0.997 50.1% -40 -64 +140 53.7% +0.07 9–6 (60%) 14–10 (58%) 105.2 -0.06 2009 1762 145.0 -1.02 -0.24 0.930 49.3% +63 +45 +54 48.5% -0.09 4–4 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 99.1 -1.73
32 2014 1948 155.3 +3.04 -2.60 0.987 49.8% -17 -179 +209 55.8% +0.15 14–3 (82%) 22–19 (54%) 109.9 +2.25 2010 1722 106.1 +0.99 -2.77 0.774 46.3% — — +51 27.3% -1.09 1–1 0–1 — -0.60
33 2015 1943 158.0 +2.20 -0.75 1.029 50.3% +56 -176 +79 54.8% +0.18 12–13 (48%) 26–15 (63%) 102.1 +2.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1889 154.0 +2.36 -0.30 1.055 50.8% +25 -36 +78 54.5% +0.23 10–10 (50%) 20–15 (57%) 102.4 +1.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1903 154.4 +2.94 -2.24 0.978 49.7% -97 -32 +126 51.2% +0.07 11–10 (52%) 16–15 (52%) 99.6 -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1806 142.4 +1.63 -2.71 0.932 49.0% -27 +12 +191 44.6% -0.49 10–4 (71%) 13–9 (59%) 107.5 +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 1808 139.4 +1.43 -2.84 0.926 48.8% -26 -93 +213 47.3% -0.08 7–5 (58%) 9–13 (41%) 99.1 -1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 1756 143.9 +1.90 -3.41 0.888 48.9% +5 -63 — 40.9% -0.45 3–3 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 100.8 -1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1593 125.8 +0.90 -5.11 0.867 47.8% +32 +34 +333 36.8% -0.80 2–9 (18%) 8–7 (53%) 90.3 +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 1468 99.6 -3.78 -3.84 0.681 43.1% +58 — +305 14.3% -2.43 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.8 +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2023 1517 114.8 +0.13 -1.94 0.853 48.1% — — +211 43.8% -0.87 1–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2011 152.3 +2.42 -2.62 0.953 49.3% -16 -72 +109 49.9% -0.11 186–158 (54%) 319–269 (54%) 107.2 -0.72 — 1995 155.1 +1.02 +1.86 1.060 51.2% +25 -127 -17 56.7% +0.45 106–67 (61%) 107–77 (58%) 111.9 -1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.