H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Feliciano Lopez vs Paul-Henri Mathieu H2H: 5-5
Feliciano Lopez and Paul-Henri Mathieu are tied 5–5 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Feliciano Lopez leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Paul-Henri Mathieu leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Feliciano Lopez won the 2013 Wimbledon second round 6-3 5-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5
–
5
10 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2013* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Feliciano Lopez | 6-3 5-1 (ret.) | Paul-Henri Mathieu | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2012* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Feliciano Lopez | 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-2 | Paul-Henri Mathieu | Match data |
| Feb 16, 2012* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Paul-Henri Mathieu | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Mar 14, 2010* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Feliciano Lopez | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Paul-Henri Mathieu | Match data |
| Jul 13, 2007* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Paul-Henri Mathieu | 4-6 6-4 7-6(4) | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Jun 13, 2007* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R64 | Grass | Paul-Henri Mathieu | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| May 25, 2005* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Paul-Henri Mathieu | 6-2 6-0 6-7(5) 6-4 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Oct 2, 2003* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Paul-Henri Mathieu | 6-1 6-4 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Aug 7, 2003* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Feliciano Lopez | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | Paul-Henri Mathieu | Match data |
| Jul 25, 2003* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Feliciano Lopez | 3-6 6-3 3-0 (ret.) | Paul-Henri Mathieu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feliciano Lopez | #672 | #12 | 2,415 | 2,013 | 497 | 477 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Paul-Henri Mathieu | #914 | #12 | 2,000 | 1,961 | 268 | 297 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Feliciano Lopez | Paul-Henri Mathieu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #275 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #159 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #62 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #36 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2003 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #28 | 1,841 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2004 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #123 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #46 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2006 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #79 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2007 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #25 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2008 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #30 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #31 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2009 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #47 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #33 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #32 | 1,807 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #97 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2011 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #20 | 1,968 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #40 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #58 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2013 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #129 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2014 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #14 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #96 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2015 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #17 | 1,943 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #95 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #28 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 2017 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #249 | 1,574 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 2018 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #64 | 1,817 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #62 | 1,824 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #64 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2021 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #106 | 1,595 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2022 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,468 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #468 | 1,517 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |