H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Feliciano Lopez vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 1-0
Feliciano Lopez holds a 1–0 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Feliciano Lopez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Feliciano Lopez won the 2005 Australian Open second round 4-6 6-3 6-4 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Feliciano Lopez | 4-6 6-3 6-4 7-6(3) | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feliciano Lopez | #672 | #12 | 2,415 | 2,013 | 497 | 477 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Feliciano Lopez | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #159 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #62 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #28 | 1,841 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #79 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2007 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2008 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #30 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2009 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #47 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #32 | 1,807 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2011 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #20 | 1,968 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2012 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #40 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2013 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2014 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #14 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2015 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #17 | 1,943 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #28 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #64 | 1,817 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #62 | 1,824 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #64 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2021 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #106 | 1,595 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2022 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,468 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #468 | 1,517 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |