H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Feliciano Lopez vs Teymuraz Gabashvili H2H: 1-1

Feliciano Lopez and Teymuraz Gabashvili are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Teymuraz Gabashvili leads 1–0 on clay, while Feliciano Lopez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Teymuraz Gabashvili won the 2015 Roland Garros first round 6-3 7-6(9) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Teymuraz Gabashvili
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Teymuraz Gabashvili #74 6-3 7-6(9) 6-3 Feliciano Lopez #12 Match data May 26, 2015* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Feliciano Lopez #64 6-3 6-4 Teymuraz Gabashvili #97 Match data Aug 13, 2007 Q2 Q Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Feliciano Lopez #63 6-4 6-4 Teymuraz Gabashvili #123 Match data Aug 3, 2006* R32 Washington Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,010 501 479 51.1% 0 0 0 3 4 7
Teymuraz Gabashvili #1,373 #43 1,226 1,838 110 196 35.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Feliciano Lopez Teymuraz Gabashvili
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #258 1,482 0 0
20 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,697 0 0 2005 2–4 33.3% #132 1,460 0 0
21 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,840 0 0 2006 6–12 33.3% #112 1,518 0 0
22 2004 32–25 56.1% #25 1,842 0 1 2007 10–28 26.3% #125 1,600 0 0
23 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1 2008 13–13 50.0% #65 1,663 0 0
24 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,675 0 1 2009 12–24 33.3% #106 1,558 0 0
25 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,803 0 1 2010 10–16 38.5% #80 1,689 0 0
26 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,832 0 1 2011 10–19 34.5% #138 1,658 0 0
27 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,725 0 1 2012 1–4 20.0% #182 1,581 0 0
28 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,801 0 2 2013 2–2 50.0% #76 1,626 0 0
29 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2 2014 18–26 40.9% #67 1,737 0 0
30 2012 26–27 49.1% #40 1,857 0 2 2015 16–21 43.2% #50 1,775 0 0
31 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3 2016 10–22 31.2% #138 1,628 0 0
32 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,947 0 4 2017 0–3 0.0% #237 1,535 0 0
33 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,942 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,888 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,902 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,806 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,807 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,756 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,593 0 7 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7 — — — — — — —
41 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Feliciano Lopez Teymuraz Gabashvili
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2002 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2003 14 14 28 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 2006 2 3 5 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2004 17 12 29 58.6% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2005 18 14 32 56.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2008 7 8 15 46.7% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — —
24 2006 9 16 25 36.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2009 5 12 17 29.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 2007 20 15 35 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2008 17 17 34 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2011 4 11 15 26.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 15 15 30 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2013 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2011 17 15 32 53.1% 13 8 21 61.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2014 9 14 23 39.1% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2012 15 16 31 48.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2016 5 10 15 33.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 2014 22 16 38 57.9% 6 7 13 46.2% 12 2 14 85.7% — — — — 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2015 20 14 34 58.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 16 14 30 53.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 8 15 23 34.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 12 12 24 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 7 10 17 41.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 2 10 12 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 272 277 549 49.5% 130 137 267 48.7% 89 53 142 62.7% 10 12 22 45.5% — 60 109 169 35.5% 41 63 104 39.4% 6 17 23 26.1% 3 7 10 30.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 957/979 of Feliciano Lopez's and 301/306 of Teymuraz Gabashvili's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Feliciano Lopez Teymuraz Gabashvili
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 1998 1/1 0.0 0.0 73.0% 37.0% 50.0% 28.6% 0.0% 40.5% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 7/7 5.6 2.9 59.3% 66.9% 49.1% 54.8% 43.7% 59.4% 35.1% 2004 2/2 5.0 3.5 56.2% 66.0% 28.1% 48.4% 50.0% 49.4% 32.5%
20 2002 30/34 9.7 4.3 60.4% 73.0% 48.8% 58.0% 42.1% 63.4% 30.5% 2005 6/6 5.0 2.7 52.8% 70.5% 47.3% 34.2% 38.1% 59.4% 37.5%
21 2003 61/65 8.1 3.3 58.2% 74.6% 52.4% 67.5% 43.8% 65.3% 33.3% 2006 18/18 5.3 3.2 55.1% 72.1% 53.6% 52.0% 32.9% 63.4% 34.2%
22 2004 54/57 10.3 3.6 57.2% 77.2% 51.9% 62.9% 40.9% 66.4% 32.3% 2007 38/38 5.6 4.8 54.2% 72.1% 45.6% 56.5% 44.0% 60.0% 31.5%
23 2005 57/57 8.6 3.3 59.8% 75.5% 50.0% 64.7% 36.1% 65.3% 32.9% 2008 25/26 4.6 3.2 60.7% 70.7% 47.9% 63.6% 48.7% 62.0% 35.9%
24 2006 47/47 9.9 3.6 57.2% 75.3% 48.3% 55.3% 36.9% 63.9% 33.4% 2009 35/36 4.7 5.5 55.0% 67.4% 45.1% 57.1% 41.8% 57.5% 33.6%
25 2007 51/51 10.0 3.5 59.7% 75.5% 52.4% 57.9% 40.5% 66.1% 32.9% 2010 26/26 5.3 3.7 55.5% 73.9% 51.4% 58.3% 36.9% 63.7% 34.9%
26 2008 47/47 11.8 3.2 60.1% 75.7% 54.2% 66.9% 41.9% 66.9% 32.1% 2011 28/29 2.9 3.6 59.1% 64.8% 49.8% 45.4% 32.9% 58.5% 35.4%
27 2009 39/40 9.7 2.7 59.1% 73.5% 50.3% 61.4% 41.0% 64.2% 32.2% 2012 5/5 2.2 3.0 60.3% 66.8% 46.6% 53.5% 37.9% 60.2% 39.8%
28 2010 49/50 10.5 3.3 57.4% 77.3% 50.8% 63.1% 37.8% 65.9% 32.3% 2013 4/4 5.3 2.5 60.4% 64.5% 55.9% 66.9% 27.0% 61.0% 35.8%
29 2011 60/60 12.2 3.7 57.6% 77.2% 53.7% 64.7% 36.4% 67.2% 32.7% 2014 43/44 3.1 3.0 59.2% 67.2% 47.4% 55.2% 37.8% 58.9% 36.9%
30 2012 50/53 9.9 3.4 56.6% 76.1% 51.1% 66.1% 38.5% 65.3% 32.4% 2015 37/37 5.4 4.4 56.7% 72.4% 51.7% 65.8% 36.9% 63.4% 35.4%
31 2013 49/50 11.1 3.6 58.9% 74.8% 53.2% 68.2% 39.1% 66.2% 33.8% 2016 31/32 4.3 4.1 57.8% 71.0% 46.5% 56.8% 39.4% 60.7% 35.5%
32 2014 64/65 10.0 3.1 59.5% 77.2% 52.4% 64.0% 36.1% 67.2% 32.4% 2017 3/3 5.7 3.0 55.8% 73.1% 45.8% 43.5% 19.7% 60.8% 33.6%
33 2015 58/58 12.7 3.6 57.3% 76.5% 53.6% 66.4% 33.4% 66.8% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 53/53 11.0 3.2 57.8% 77.8% 51.5% 63.1% 38.5% 66.5% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 48/49 10.8 2.9 59.5% 77.0% 51.4% 64.1% 38.3% 66.5% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 42/43 11.8 3.1 60.9% 76.5% 48.6% 63.3% 39.5% 65.4% 32.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 26/28 12.9 4.2 56.7% 76.5% 51.9% 66.8% 36.0% 66.0% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 17/17 14.2 5.1 53.7% 79.3% 47.9% 70.8% 37.0% 64.8% 31.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 29/29 10.4 4.8 55.1% 77.3% 50.8% 53.0% 43.1% 65.2% 30.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 11/11 9.4 5.6 51.6% 74.1% 39.5% 56.6% 18.7% 57.1% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
41 2023 7/7 10.4 4.4 54.3% 76.6% 52.7% 65.7% 26.4% 65.9% 29.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Feliciano Lopez Teymuraz Gabashvili
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1998 1491 95.8 +0.71 -0.39 0.571 36.7% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1480 100.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1520 116.2 -0.46 -2.22 0.863 47.5% — +31 — 38.9% -0.78 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 98.5 +0.17 2004 1483 99.7 -2.62 -3.21 0.643 42.2% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — -0.04
20 2002 1698 127.3 +1.48 -5.32 0.834 47.5% -42 -107 -65 47.5% -0.35 13–4 (76%) 10–8 (56%) 114.4 +0.51 2005 1460 104.7 -1.72 +0.46 0.923 48.0% +39 — — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) — — -0.05
21 2003 1841 141.9 +3.32 -2.91 0.959 49.6% -82 -104 -140 51.6% -0.01 11–11 (50%) 20–17 (54%) 105.0 -2.29 2006 1519 124.5 +0.17 -2.07 0.934 48.3% +30 -56 — 39.1% -0.56 4–5 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 104.6 +0.08
22 2004 1843 141.1 +3.06 -2.87 0.962 49.6% -4 -87 -139 53.5% +0.07 12–9 (57%) 13–16 (45%) 100.2 +0.64 2007 1601 122.2 -2.72 -4.45 0.786 46.1% +27 -120 -80 32.2% -1.19 5–9 (36%) 6–7 (46%) 94.0 +0.15
23 2005 1760 138.7 +2.28 -3.17 0.949 49.1% -15 -35 +85 52.0% -0.07 13–7 (65%) 18–15 (55%) 103.7 -0.87 2008 1663 125.3 -1.37 -0.76 0.945 49.3% +18 -115 — 51.6% -0.16 3–5 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 102.1 -0.30
24 2006 1676 133.5 +1.55 -2.92 0.925 48.9% -40 +59 +97 41.8% -0.47 9–9 (50%) 11–13 (46%) 98.3 -1.61 2009 1558 127.3 -4.68 -2.56 0.791 46.0% 0 +87 -54 35.2% -1.04 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 -1.33
25 2007 1803 144.0 +3.00 -2.42 0.971 49.7% -12 -87 -39 52.6% -0.04 8–10 (44%) 21–14 (60%) 104.0 -1.68 2010 1690 131.4 +0.51 -0.82 0.960 49.6% -79 +40 — 45.1% -0.13 2–7 (22%) 4–9 (31%) 91.9 -0.07
26 2008 1832 150.3 +3.61 -2.59 0.970 49.7% +8 -169 +26 50.4% -0.12 6–10 (38%) 17–8 (68%) 103.6 -1.42 2011 1659 129.5 -3.46 -1.02 0.853 46.9% -19 -3 -119 37.5% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 9–5 (64%) 102.0 -1.17
27 2009 1726 141.9 +1.43 -2.88 0.900 48.4% +26 -48 +98 47.2% -0.30 7–11 (39%) 13–9 (59%) 100.2 -0.15 2012 1582 110.0 -1.43 -0.89 1.001 50.1% +36 — — 30.8% -0.69 0–1 1–1 — +0.59
28 2010 1802 148.0 +2.32 -2.85 0.948 49.5% -6 -112 +49 50.0% -0.03 6–2 (75%) 13–13 (50%) 104.4 +0.29 2013 1626 123.4 +0.15 -1.01 0.917 48.3% +2 — — 36.4% -0.27 2–0 0–2 — +0.01
29 2011 1969 161.7 +4.60 -2.41 0.997 49.9% -64 -112 +32 55.2% +0.10 12–10 (55%) 28–17 (62%) 111.3 -3.54 2014 1738 145.9 -3.57 +0.71 0.898 48.1% -11 -21 — 42.5% -0.47 6–4 (60%) 4–8 (33%) 100.8 -0.72
30 2012 1858 151.5 +1.97 -3.28 0.934 49.0% +2 -55 +79 48.8% +0.13 10–5 (67%) 14–25 (36%) 96.1 -1.11 2015 1776 146.4 -0.48 +0.12 0.968 49.3% -81 +102 — 45.7% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 103.2 -1.36
31 2013 1915 149.8 +2.60 -1.97 0.997 50.1% -40 -64 +140 53.7% +0.07 9–6 (60%) 14–10 (58%) 105.2 -0.06 2016 1628 128.0 -2.29 -1.28 0.903 48.3% -27 +144 -72 37.3% -0.49 3–7 (30%) 4–5 (44%) 95.2 +0.50
32 2014 1948 155.3 +3.04 -2.60 0.987 49.8% -17 -179 +209 55.8% +0.15 14–3 (82%) 22–19 (54%) 109.9 +2.25 2017 1535 104.6 -1.16 -2.90 0.856 46.0% — — — 30.0% -1.50 0–2 1–1 — +0.47
33 2015 1943 158.0 +2.20 -0.75 1.029 50.3% +56 -176 +79 54.8% +0.18 12–13 (48%) 26–15 (63%) 102.1 +2.95 2018 1511 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1889 154.0 +2.36 -0.30 1.055 50.8% +25 -36 +78 54.5% +0.23 10–10 (50%) 20–15 (57%) 102.4 +1.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1903 154.4 +2.94 -2.24 0.978 49.7% -97 -32 +126 51.2% +0.07 11–10 (52%) 16–15 (52%) 99.6 -1.42 2020 1498 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1806 142.4 +1.63 -2.71 0.932 49.0% -27 +12 +191 44.6% -0.49 10–4 (71%) 13–9 (59%) 107.5 +0.44 2021 1474 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 1808 139.4 +1.43 -2.84 0.926 48.8% -26 -93 +213 47.3% -0.08 7–5 (58%) 9–13 (41%) 99.1 -1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 1756 143.9 +1.90 -3.41 0.888 48.9% +5 -63 — 40.9% -0.45 3–3 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 100.8 -1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1593 125.8 +0.90 -5.11 0.867 47.8% +32 +34 +333 36.8% -0.80 2–9 (18%) 8–7 (53%) 90.3 +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 1468 99.6 -3.78 -3.84 0.681 43.1% +58 — +305 14.3% -2.43 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.8 +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2023 1517 114.8 +0.13 -1.94 0.853 48.1% — — +211 43.8% -0.87 1–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2011 152.3 +2.42 -2.62 0.953 49.3% -16 -72 +109 49.9% -0.11 186–158 (54%) 319–269 (54%) 107.2 -0.72 — 1839 133.8 -2.16 -1.30 0.885 47.9% -15 +19 -83 39.9% -0.64 41–62 (40%) 53–54 (50%) 97.0 -1.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.