H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Feliciano Lopez vs Tim Henman H2H: 2-1

Feliciano Lopez holds a 2–1 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Feliciano Lopez leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Feliciano Lopez won the 2007 Wimbledon second round 7-6(3) 7-6(5) 3-6 2-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Feliciano Lopez #78 7-6(3) 7-6(5) 3-6 2-6 6-1 Tim Henman #74 Match data Jun 28, 2007* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Feliciano Lopez #96 6-7(1) 6-3 6-4 Tim Henman #37 Match data Feb 26, 2007 RR Las Vegas International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Tim Henman #49 6-2 7-6(6) Feliciano Lopez #38 Match data Mar 2, 2006* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,010 501 479 51.1% 0 0 0 3 4 7
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Feliciano Lopez Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,697 0 0 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0
21 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,840 0 0 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0
22 2004 32–25 56.1% #25 1,842 0 1 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,675 0 1 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4
25 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,803 0 1 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6
26 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,832 0 1 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8
27 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,725 0 1 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9
28 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,801 0 2 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11
29 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11
30 2012 26–27 49.1% #40 1,857 0 2 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11
32 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,947 0 4 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11
33 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,942 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,888 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,902 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,806 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,807 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,756 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,593 0 7 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7 — — — — — — —
41 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Feliciano Lopez Tim Henman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 2002 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2003 14 14 28 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4%
22 2004 17 12 29 58.6% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
23 2005 18 14 32 56.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 2006 9 16 25 36.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2%
25 2007 20 15 35 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2008 17 17 34 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2010 15 15 30 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9%
29 2011 17 15 32 53.1% 13 8 21 61.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2012 15 16 31 48.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
32 2014 22 16 38 57.9% 6 7 13 46.2% 12 2 14 85.7% — — — — 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 2015 20 14 34 58.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 16 14 30 53.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 8 15 23 34.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 12 12 24 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 7 10 17 41.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 2 10 12 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 272 277 549 49.5% 130 137 267 48.7% 89 53 142 62.7% 10 12 22 45.5% — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 957/979 of Feliciano Lopez's and 644/732 of Tim Henman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Feliciano Lopez Tim Henman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 1998 1/1 0.0 0.0 73.0% 37.0% 50.0% 28.6% 0.0% 40.5% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 7/7 5.6 2.9 59.3% 66.9% 49.1% 54.8% 43.7% 59.4% 35.1% 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4%
20 2002 30/34 9.7 4.3 60.4% 73.0% 48.8% 58.0% 42.1% 63.4% 30.5% 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7%
21 2003 61/65 8.1 3.3 58.2% 74.6% 52.4% 67.5% 43.8% 65.3% 33.3% 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7%
22 2004 54/57 10.3 3.6 57.2% 77.2% 51.9% 62.9% 40.9% 66.4% 32.3% 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3%
23 2005 57/57 8.6 3.3 59.8% 75.5% 50.0% 64.7% 36.1% 65.3% 32.9% 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3%
24 2006 47/47 9.9 3.6 57.2% 75.3% 48.3% 55.3% 36.9% 63.9% 33.4% 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2%
25 2007 51/51 10.0 3.5 59.7% 75.5% 52.4% 57.9% 40.5% 66.1% 32.9% 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2%
26 2008 47/47 11.8 3.2 60.1% 75.7% 54.2% 66.9% 41.9% 66.9% 32.1% 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8%
27 2009 39/40 9.7 2.7 59.1% 73.5% 50.3% 61.4% 41.0% 64.2% 32.2% 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8%
28 2010 49/50 10.5 3.3 57.4% 77.3% 50.8% 63.1% 37.8% 65.9% 32.3% 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5%
29 2011 60/60 12.2 3.7 57.6% 77.2% 53.7% 64.7% 36.4% 67.2% 32.7% 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1%
30 2012 50/53 9.9 3.4 56.6% 76.1% 51.1% 66.1% 38.5% 65.3% 32.4% 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2%
31 2013 49/50 11.1 3.6 58.9% 74.8% 53.2% 68.2% 39.1% 66.2% 33.8% 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9%
32 2014 64/65 10.0 3.1 59.5% 77.2% 52.4% 64.0% 36.1% 67.2% 32.4% 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5%
33 2015 58/58 12.7 3.6 57.3% 76.5% 53.6% 66.4% 33.4% 66.8% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 53/53 11.0 3.2 57.8% 77.8% 51.5% 63.1% 38.5% 66.5% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 48/49 10.8 2.9 59.5% 77.0% 51.4% 64.1% 38.3% 66.5% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 42/43 11.8 3.1 60.9% 76.5% 48.6% 63.3% 39.5% 65.4% 32.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 26/28 12.9 4.2 56.7% 76.5% 51.9% 66.8% 36.0% 66.0% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 17/17 14.2 5.1 53.7% 79.3% 47.9% 70.8% 37.0% 64.8% 31.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 29/29 10.4 4.8 55.1% 77.3% 50.8% 53.0% 43.1% 65.2% 30.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 11/11 9.4 5.6 51.6% 74.1% 39.5% 56.6% 18.7% 57.1% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
41 2023 7/7 10.4 4.4 54.3% 76.6% 52.7% 65.7% 26.4% 65.9% 29.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 957/980 10.5 3.5 58.2% 76.0% 51.4% 63.4% 38.4% 65.7% 32.7% — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Feliciano Lopez Tim Henman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1998 1491 95.8 +0.71 -0.39 0.571 36.7% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1480 100.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1520 116.2 -0.46 -2.22 0.863 47.5% — +31 — 38.9% -0.78 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.17 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33
20 2002 1698 127.3 +1.48 -5.32 0.834 47.5% -42 -107 -65 47.5% -0.35 13–4 (76%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.51 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04
21 2003 1841 141.9 +3.32 -2.91 0.959 49.6% -82 -104 -140 51.6% -0.01 11–11 (50%) 20–17 (54%) — -2.29 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81
22 2004 1843 141.1 +3.06 -2.87 0.962 49.6% -4 -87 -139 53.5% +0.07 12–9 (57%) 13–16 (45%) — +0.64 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85
23 2005 1760 138.7 +2.28 -3.17 0.949 49.1% -15 -35 +85 52.0% -0.07 13–7 (65%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.87 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62
24 2006 1676 133.5 +1.55 -2.92 0.925 48.9% -40 +59 +97 41.8% -0.47 9–9 (50%) 11–13 (46%) — -1.61 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72
25 2007 1803 144.0 +3.00 -2.42 0.971 49.7% -12 -87 -39 52.6% -0.04 8–10 (44%) 21–14 (60%) — -1.68 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25
26 2008 1832 150.3 +3.61 -2.59 0.970 49.7% +8 -169 +26 50.4% -0.12 6–10 (38%) 17–8 (68%) — -1.42 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30
27 2009 1726 141.9 +1.43 -2.88 0.900 48.4% +26 -48 +98 47.2% -0.30 7–11 (39%) 13–9 (59%) — -0.15 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21
28 2010 1802 148.0 +2.32 -2.85 0.948 49.5% -6 -112 +49 50.0% -0.03 6–2 (75%) 13–13 (50%) — +0.29 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72
29 2011 1969 161.7 +4.60 -2.41 0.997 49.9% -64 -112 +32 55.2% +0.10 12–10 (55%) 28–17 (62%) — -3.54 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11
30 2012 1858 151.5 +1.97 -3.28 0.934 49.0% +2 -55 +79 48.8% +0.13 10–5 (67%) 14–25 (36%) — -1.11 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77
31 2013 1915 149.8 +2.60 -1.97 0.997 50.1% -40 -64 +140 53.7% +0.07 9–6 (60%) 14–10 (58%) — -0.06 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94
32 2014 1948 155.3 +3.04 -2.60 0.987 49.8% -17 -179 +209 55.8% +0.15 14–3 (82%) 22–19 (54%) — +2.25 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06
33 2015 1943 158.0 +2.20 -0.75 1.029 50.3% +56 -176 +79 54.8% +0.18 12–13 (48%) 26–15 (63%) — +2.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1889 154.0 +2.36 -0.30 1.055 50.8% +25 -36 +78 54.5% +0.23 10–10 (50%) 20–15 (57%) — +1.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1903 154.4 +2.94 -2.24 0.978 49.7% -97 -32 +126 51.2% +0.07 11–10 (52%) 16–15 (52%) — -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1806 142.4 +1.63 -2.71 0.932 49.0% -27 +12 +191 44.6% -0.49 10–4 (71%) 13–9 (59%) — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 1808 139.4 +1.43 -2.84 0.926 48.8% -26 -93 +213 47.3% -0.08 7–5 (58%) 9–13 (41%) — -1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 1756 143.9 +1.90 -3.41 0.888 48.9% +5 -63 — 40.9% -0.45 3–3 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1593 125.8 +0.90 -5.11 0.867 47.8% +32 +34 +333 36.8% -0.80 2–9 (18%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 1468 99.6 -3.78 -3.84 0.681 43.1% +58 — +305 14.3% -2.43 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2023 1517 114.8 +0.13 -1.94 0.853 48.1% — — +211 43.8% -0.87 1–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2011 152.3 +2.42 -2.62 0.953 49.3% -16 -72 +109 49.9% -0.11 186–158 (54%) 319–269 (54%) 107.2 -0.72 — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.