H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Felix Auger-Aliassime vs Borna Coric H2H: 1-2
Borna Coric holds a 2–1 lead over Felix Auger-Aliassime in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Borna Coric leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Borna Coric won the 2022 Cincinnati Masters quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Canada
Age 25
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Croatia
Age 29
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2022* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Borna Coric | 6-4 6-4 | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Match data |
| May 14, 2019* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Borna Coric | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Match data |
| Mar 29, 2019* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Felix Auger-Aliassime | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Borna Coric | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | #4 | #4 | 4,740 | 2,105 | 277 | 172 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| Borna Coric | #237 | #12 | 2,695 | 2,047 | 200 | 187 | 51.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Borna Coric | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2018 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #108 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #102 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2019 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,859 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2020 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #48 | 1,866 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #11 | 1,982 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #48 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2022 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #6 | 2,051 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2023 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #29 | 1,858 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #28 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2024 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,883 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2025 | 50–24 | 67.6% | #5 | 2,028 | 0 | 8 | 2021 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #73 | 1,891 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2026 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #4 | 1,985 | 0 | 9 | 2022 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #90 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 |