H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Felix Auger-Aliassime holds a 5–3 lead over Casper Ruud in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Felix Auger-Aliassime leads 3–1 on clay, while they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Felix Auger-Aliassime won the 2026 Monte-Carlo Masters third round 7-5 2-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | 7-5 2-2 (ret.) | Casper Ruud | Match data | Apr 9, 2026 | R16 | Monte-Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Clay |
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | 6-3 6-1 | Casper Ruud | Match data | Aug 15, 2024* | R32 | Cincinnati Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | 6-4 6-7(8) 6-3 | Casper Ruud | Match data | Aug 2, 2024* | QF | Paris Olympics | Olympics | Clay |
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | 6-4 7-5 | Casper Ruud | Match data | May 1, 2024* | R16 | Madrid Open | Masters 1000 | Clay |
| Casper Ruud | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Match data | Nov 14, 2022 | RR | ATP Finals | ATP Finals | Hard |
| Casper Ruud | 6-1 6-2 | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Match data | Aug 13, 2022* | QF | Canadian Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Casper Ruud | 6-1 6-4 | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Match data | May 4, 2021* | R64 | Madrid Open | Masters 1000 | Clay |
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | Casper Ruud | Match data | Mar 22, 2019* | R128 | Miami Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | #4 | #4 | 4,740 | 2,097 | 284 | 175 | 61.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| Casper Ruud | #20 | #2 | 5,850 | 2,127 | 289 | 163 | 63.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Casper Ruud | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2018 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #108 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2019 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2020 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #11 | 1,971 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #54 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #6 | 2,050 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #27 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2023 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #29 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,047 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2024 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,813 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #3 | 2,048 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 2025 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #5 | 2,035 | 0 | 8 | 2023 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #11 | 1,889 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 2026 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #4 | 1,984 | 0 | 9 | 2024 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,909 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #20 | 1,895 | 0 | 14 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Casper Ruud | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2018 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 2017 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 21 | 13 | 34 | 61.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 63.2% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 2019 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2022 | 36 | 12 | 48 | 75.0% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2020 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 17 | 6 | 23 | 73.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2023 | 21 | 15 | 36 | 58.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2021 | 22 | 11 | 33 | 66.7% | 29 | 5 | 34 | 85.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 2024 | 12 | 15 | 27 | 44.4% | 18 | 8 | 26 | 69.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2022 | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 25 | 7 | 32 | 78.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 24 | 2025 | 41 | 14 | 55 | 74.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2023 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 22 | 8 | 30 | 73.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2026 | 17 | 6 | 23 | 73.9% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 2024 | 21 | 16 | 37 | 56.8% | 25 | 7 | 32 | 78.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 17 | 6 | 23 | 73.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 188 | 106 | 294 | 63.9% | 60 | 49 | 109 | 55.0% | 36 | 20 | 56 | 64.3% | — | 108 | 92 | 200 | 54.0% | 176 | 63 | 239 | 73.6% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 443/460 of Felix Auger-Aliassime's and 443/452 of Casper Ruud's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Casper Ruud | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 2018 | 16/16 | 6.3 | 4.4 | 60.6% | 68.5% | 51.1% | 59.8% | 37.0% | 61.9% | 37.0% | 2016 | 1/1 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 62.7% | 73.0% | 63.6% | 33.3% | 16.7% | 69.5% | 23.2% |
| 18 | 2019 | 53/54 | 9.0 | 4.7 | 65.4% | 74.7% | 48.4% | 62.2% | 46.6% | 65.5% | 35.1% | 2017 | 13/13 | 3.8 | 2.5 | 67.0% | 68.3% | 52.1% | 66.1% | 44.2% | 62.4% | 32.4% |
| 19 | 2020 | 38/38 | 8.8 | 4.3 | 63.5% | 74.8% | 51.5% | 64.5% | 35.7% | 66.6% | 36.5% | 2018 | 15/15 | 6.0 | 2.6 | 63.5% | 69.3% | 47.3% | 61.0% | 40.1% | 61.2% | 33.8% |
| 20 | 2021 | 60/61 | 9.2 | 4.2 | 62.9% | 77.3% | 51.2% | 54.4% | 43.0% | 67.5% | 37.4% | 2019 | 37/37 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 64.7% | 70.6% | 52.6% | 56.9% | 46.3% | 64.4% | 37.1% |
| 21 | 2022 | 74/74 | 11.2 | 3.4 | 65.0% | 77.9% | 51.5% | 63.2% | 40.4% | 68.5% | 38.1% | 2020 | 31/31 | 4.3 | 1.9 | 65.9% | 70.3% | 54.8% | 62.3% | 41.9% | 64.9% | 38.7% |
| 22 | 2023 | 41/42 | 9.1 | 4.9 | 60.2% | 77.9% | 48.0% | 60.0% | 36.2% | 66.3% | 34.8% | 2021 | 69/71 | 4.9 | 1.9 | 63.9% | 74.0% | 56.8% | 57.3% | 49.7% | 67.9% | 39.3% |
| 23 | 2024 | 48/55 | 8.1 | 4.3 | 62.1% | 75.8% | 51.8% | 62.1% | 42.2% | 66.6% | 36.8% | 2022 | 66/66 | 5.9 | 2.0 | 65.3% | 75.0% | 55.6% | 59.5% | 42.8% | 68.1% | 37.0% |
| 24 | 2025 | 68/73 | 10.5 | 3.3 | 66.6% | 77.8% | 52.9% | 60.9% | 35.5% | 69.4% | 36.2% | 2023 | 57/57 | 5.3 | 2.9 | 63.7% | 72.0% | 54.0% | 65.3% | 39.5% | 65.5% | 38.4% |
| 25 | 2026 | 45/47 | 10.6 | 2.6 | 67.6% | 78.9% | 53.2% | 60.0% | 43.7% | 70.4% | 36.1% | 2024 | 65/71 | 5.8 | 2.1 | 65.6% | 72.5% | 55.4% | 56.7% | 42.6% | 66.3% | 37.7% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 50/51 | 5.8 | 2.1 | 66.5% | 73.6% | 54.8% | 54.4% | 39.8% | 67.2% | 37.4% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 39/39 | 5.8 | 2.5 | 66.7% | 71.9% | 57.1% | 60.0% | 38.9% | 67.1% | 38.6% |
| Career | — | 443/460 | 9.6 | 3.9 | 64.2% | 76.7% | 51.2% | 60.8% | 40.4% | 67.5% | 36.5% | — | 443/452 | 5.3 | 2.3 | 65.2% | 72.6% | 54.9% | 59.1% | 42.9% | 66.4% | 37.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Casper Ruud | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2016 | 1489 | 101.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2017 | 1496 | 107.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 1607 | 125.7 | -0.91 | +0.36 | 0.971 | 49.5% | +9 | -49 | — | 47.4% | -0.24 | 2–6 (25%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | +0.96 | 2016 | 1488 | 107.1 | +0.83 | -0.30 | 0.760 | 44.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.09 |
| 18 | 2019 | 1851 | 153.2 | +1.05 | +0.29 | 1.018 | 50.5% | -61 | -75 | -62 | 55.2% | +0.14 | 10–7 (59%) | 19–9 (68%) | — | +0.28 | 2017 | 1543 | 123.9 | -0.32 | -2.90 | 0.862 | 48.1% | -36 | +68 | — | 42.3% | -0.42 | 1–1 | 2–3 (40%) | — | +0.63 |
| 19 | 2020 | 1856 | 156.8 | +2.50 | +0.03 | 1.091 | 51.4% | +26 | -150 | — | 55.3% | +0.39 | 6–4 (60%) | 14–9 (61%) | — | +0.03 | 2018 | 1689 | 134.0 | -0.58 | -2.48 | 0.871 | 48.4% | -63 | +30 | — | 41.5% | -0.12 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–4 (20%) | — | -0.50 |
| 20 | 2021 | 1971 | 158.3 | +3.83 | +1.61 | 1.149 | 52.0% | -26 | -258 | +17 | 57.8% | +0.51 | 10–6 (63%) | 14–12 (54%) | — | -0.33 | 2019 | 1772 | 139.3 | +0.18 | +1.21 | 1.042 | 51.2% | -121 | +103 | — | 50.6% | +0.28 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–6 (40%) | — | +0.64 |
| 21 | 2022 | 2050 | 167.2 | +5.11 | +2.30 | 1.211 | 52.9% | +39 | -163 | -141 | 64.2% | +0.87 | 13–9 (59%) | 27–20 (57%) | — | +1.47 | 2020 | 1860 | 150.0 | +1.68 | +2.01 | 1.101 | 51.8% | -216 | +102 | — | 54.5% | +0.56 | 6–4 (60%) | 3–7 (30%) | — | -0.82 |
| 22 | 2023 | 1869 | 149.2 | +2.15 | -0.90 | 1.032 | 50.5% | +60 | -54 | — | 50.5% | +0.15 | 7–3 (70%) | 15–14 (52%) | — | +2.16 | 2021 | 2048 | 162.4 | +4.67 | +2.55 | 1.226 | 53.5% | -90 | +70 | -454 | 68.5% | +1.25 | 14–3 (82%) | 12–8 (60%) | — | +1.70 |
| 23 | 2024 | 1814 | 152.2 | +2.11 | +1.03 | 1.100 | 51.5% | -49 | +146 | — | 53.4% | +0.47 | 6–10 (38%) | 9–13 (41%) | — | +0.26 | 2022 | 2048 | 163.8 | +4.46 | +1.52 | 1.161 | 52.5% | -17 | +133 | -461 | 64.2% | +0.91 | 11–6 (65%) | 25–12 (68%) | — | +0.08 |
| 24 | 2025 | 2036 | 158.9 | +4.52 | +1.48 | 1.186 | 52.1% | +23 | -186 | -218 | 62.1% | +0.53 | 19–6 (76%) | 32–14 (70%) | — | +2.60 | 2023 | 1890 | 152.7 | +1.58 | +1.92 | 1.112 | 51.9% | -58 | +275 | — | 60.4% | +0.68 | 7–11 (39%) | 18–13 (58%) | — | +2.35 |
| 25 | 2026 | 1985 | 152.4 | +4.77 | +0.72 | 1.218 | 52.8% | +23 | -84 | -78 | 65.0% | +1.04 | 7–4 (64%) | 15–13 (54%) | — | +0.41 | 2024 | 1909 | 162.8 | +2.26 | +2.49 | 1.120 | 52.0% | -33 | +247 | — | 60.9% | +0.71 | 16–6 (73%) | 16–11 (59%) | — | +1.00 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1917 | 153.8 | +2.61 | +1.69 | 1.139 | 52.2% | -42 | +186 | — | 65.9% | +0.75 | 8–7 (53%) | 9–4 (69%) | — | +2.67 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1896 | 157.7 | +2.30 | +3.24 | 1.173 | 52.9% | -70 | +194 | — | 59.2% | +0.75 | 7–2 (78%) | 7–10 (41%) | — | -0.77 |
| Career | — | 2098 | 161.1 | +3.29 | +0.98 | 1.125 | 51.7% | +11 | -63 | -87 | 58.3% | +0.51 | 80–55 (59%) | 150–106 (59%) | 111.1 | +1.72 | — | 2128 | 160.0 | +2.53 | +1.78 | 1.120 | 52.1% | -60 | +154 | -457 | 60.4% | +0.72 | 79–47 (63%) | 97–79 (55%) | 103.5 | +1.54 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefanos Tsitsipas | 4 | 7 | 11 | Aug 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 2 | 7 | 9 | Feb 27, 2026 | H2H |
| Alexander Zverev | 3 | 6 | 9 | Nov 14, 2025 | H2H |
| Andrey Rublev | 2 | 7 | 9 | Sep 2, 2025 | H2H |
| Jannik Sinner | 3 | 5 | 8 | Apr 10, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Schwartzman | 4 | 5 | 9 | Mar 11, 2023 | H2H |
| Jaume Munar | 7 | 1 | 8 | Apr 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | 3 | 5 | 8 | Apr 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Matteo Berrettini | 6 | 2 | 8 | Sep 28, 2025 | H2H |
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 5 | 3 | 8 | May 27, 2025 | H2H |