H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Felix Auger-Aliassime vs Marcelo Arevalo.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | 6-7(2) 6-1 3-2 (ret.) | Marcelo Arevalo | Match data | Dec 31, 2018 | Q1 | Pune | ATP 250 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | #4 | #4 | 4,740 | 2,097 | 284 | 175 | 61.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| Marcelo Arevalo | #1,321 | #139 | 401 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Marcelo Arevalo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2018 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #108 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #11 | 1,971 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2022 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #6 | 2,050 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2023 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #29 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2024 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,813 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2025 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #5 | 2,035 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2026 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #4 | 1,993 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,388 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #353 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Marcelo Arevalo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2016 | 1489 | 101.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2017 | 1496 | 107.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 1607 | 125.7 | -0.91 | +0.36 | 0.971 | 49.5% | +9 | -49 | — | 47.4% | -0.24 | 2–6 (25%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | +0.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 1851 | 153.2 | +1.05 | +0.29 | 1.018 | 50.5% | -61 | -75 | -62 | 55.2% | +0.14 | 10–7 (59%) | 19–9 (68%) | — | +0.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 1856 | 156.8 | +2.50 | +0.03 | 1.091 | 51.4% | +26 | -150 | — | 55.3% | +0.39 | 6–4 (60%) | 14–9 (61%) | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 1971 | 158.3 | +3.83 | +1.61 | 1.149 | 52.0% | -26 | -258 | +17 | 57.8% | +0.51 | 10–6 (63%) | 14–12 (54%) | — | -0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2022 | 2050 | 167.2 | +5.11 | +2.30 | 1.211 | 52.9% | +39 | -163 | -141 | 64.2% | +0.87 | 13–9 (59%) | 27–20 (57%) | — | +1.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2023 | 1869 | 149.2 | +2.15 | -0.90 | 1.032 | 50.5% | +60 | -54 | — | 50.5% | +0.15 | 7–3 (70%) | 15–14 (52%) | — | +2.16 | 2013 | 1483 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2024 | 1814 | 152.2 | +2.11 | +1.03 | 1.100 | 51.5% | -49 | +146 | — | 53.4% | +0.47 | 6–10 (38%) | 9–13 (41%) | — | +0.26 | 2014 | 1503 | 102.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2025 | 2036 | 158.9 | +4.52 | +1.48 | 1.186 | 52.1% | +23 | -186 | -218 | 62.1% | +0.53 | 19–6 (76%) | 32–14 (70%) | — | +2.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2026 | 1994 | 152.6 | +4.73 | +0.82 | 1.216 | 52.8% | +24 | -92 | -86 | 65.3% | +1.05 | 7–4 (64%) | 15–13 (54%) | — | +0.42 | 2016 | 1471 | 95.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1417 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1389 | 97.7 | -0.30 | -1.09 | 0.727 | 45.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.22 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1444 | 109.3 | -1.01 | +0.36 | 0.545 | 39.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.06 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1435 | 102.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1421 | 98.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.34 |
| Career | — | 2098 | 161.1 | +3.28 | +0.99 | 1.125 | 51.7% | +11 | -64 | -89 | 58.3% | +0.52 | 80–55 (59%) | 150–106 (59%) | 111.1 | +1.72 | — | 1514 | 101.6 | -0.66 | -0.37 | 0.627 | 42.7% | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.57 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +16.67 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefanos Tsitsipas | 4 | 7 | 11 | Aug 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 2 | 7 | 9 | Feb 27, 2026 | H2H |
| Alexander Zverev | 3 | 6 | 9 | Nov 14, 2025 | H2H |
| Andrey Rublev | 2 | 7 | 9 | Sep 2, 2025 | H2H |
| Jannik Sinner | 3 | 5 | 8 | Apr 10, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Salisbury | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 5, 2025 | H2H |
| Pablo Cuevas | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 14, 2019 | H2H |
| Marcos Giron | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 1, 2018 | H2H |