H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Felix Mantilla vs David Prinosil H2H: 1-1
Felix Mantilla and David Prinosil are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Prinosil leads 1–0 on carpet, while Felix Mantilla leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Felix Mantilla won the 1999 Rome Masters quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 1999* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Felix Mantilla | 6-2 6-4 | David Prinosil | Match data |
| Oct 23, 1997* | Stuttgart Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | David Prinosil | 7-5 6-4 | Felix Mantilla | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Felix Mantilla | #1,133 | #10 | 2,385 | 1,960 | 307 | 218 | 58.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Felix Mantilla | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 48–27 | 64.0% | #18 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #16 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1999 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2000 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #99 | 1,670 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2001 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2002 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #55 | 1,733 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2003 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,709 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2004 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #102 | 1,693 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2005 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #117 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #425 | 1,650 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |