H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Felix Mantilla vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 1-0
Felix Mantilla holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Felix Mantilla leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Felix Mantilla won the 1996 Monte Carlo Masters second round 3-6 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 1996* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Felix Mantilla | 3-6 6-0 6-2 | Diego Nargiso | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Felix Mantilla | #1,133 | #10 | 2,385 | 1,960 | 307 | 218 | 58.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Diego Nargiso | #1,400 | #67 | 531 | 1,702 | 94 | 152 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Felix Mantilla | Diego Nargiso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #90 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #150 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 48–27 | 64.0% | #18 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #16 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #88 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #118 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #99 | 1,670 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #280 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #55 | 1,733 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #152 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,709 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #102 | 1,693 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2005 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #117 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #425 | 1,650 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |