H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Felix Mantilla vs Guillermo Canas H2H: 3-1
Felix Mantilla holds a 3–1 lead over Guillermo Canas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Felix Mantilla leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillermo Canas won the 2002 Stuttgart fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2002* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Guillermo Canas | 6-4 6-3 | Felix Mantilla | Match data |
| Aug 24, 2001* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Felix Mantilla | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
| Aug 26, 1999* | Boston | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Felix Mantilla | 7-6(9) 6-3 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
| Nov 5, 1998* | Bogota | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Felix Mantilla | 6-4 6-2 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Felix Mantilla | #1,133 | #10 | 2,385 | 1,960 | 307 | 218 | 58.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 2,008 | 244 | 188 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Felix Mantilla | Guillermo Canas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 48–27 | 64.0% | #18 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #16 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 8 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2000 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #99 | 1,670 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2001 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2002 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #55 | 1,733 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2003 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,709 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #102 | 1,693 | 0 | 10 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2005 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #117 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #79 | 1,690 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #425 | 1,650 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |