H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Felix Mantilla vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 3-1
Felix Mantilla holds a 3–1 lead over Juan Ignacio Chela in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Felix Mantilla leads 3–0 on clay, while Juan Ignacio Chela leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Felix Mantilla won the 2003 Acapulco third round 7-6(4) 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2003* | Acapulco | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Felix Mantilla | 7-6(4) 7-6(1) | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Juan Ignacio Chela | 6-2 7-6(4) 6-2 | Felix Mantilla | Match data |
| May 10, 2000* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Felix Mantilla | 6-3 6-3 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2000* | Bogota | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Felix Mantilla | 6-4 7-5 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Felix Mantilla | #1,133 | #10 | 2,385 | 1,960 | 307 | 218 | 58.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Felix Mantilla | Juan Ignacio Chela | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1996 | 48–27 | 64.0% | #18 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1997 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #16 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1999 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2000 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #99 | 1,670 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2001 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2002 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #55 | 1,733 | 0 | 9 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2003 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,709 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2004 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #102 | 1,693 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2005 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #117 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #425 | 1,650 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 |