H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Felix Mantilla vs Tomas Carbonell H2H: 1-0
Felix Mantilla holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Carbonell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Felix Mantilla leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Felix Mantilla won the 1996 Oporto quarterfinal 7-6(9) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 1996* | Oporto | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Felix Mantilla | 7-6(9) 6-3 | Tomas Carbonell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Felix Mantilla | #1,133 | #10 | 2,385 | 1,960 | 307 | 218 | 58.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Tomas Carbonell | #860 | #40 | 900 | 1,776 | 193 | 222 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Felix Mantilla | Tomas Carbonell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #242 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 48–27 | 64.0% | #18 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #16 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #96 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #65 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #89 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2000 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #99 | 1,670 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #62 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2001 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2002 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #55 | 1,733 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #75 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2003 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,709 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2004 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #102 | 1,693 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2005 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #117 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #826 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #425 | 1,650 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |