H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs David Ferrer H2H: 4-5

David Ferrer holds a 5–4 lead over Fernando Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 3–1 on clay, while Fernando Gonzalez leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2012 Buenos Aires quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.

CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 5
9 main draw meetings
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 25, 2012* Buenos Aires ATP 250 QF Clay David Ferrer #5 6-2 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #263 Match data
Feb 27, 2010* Acapulco ATP 500 SF Clay David Ferrer #17 6-7(4) 6-0 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #12 Match data
Oct 8, 2009* Beijing ATP 500 R32 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #12 7-5 6-4 David Ferrer #19 Match data
Apr 25, 2009* Barcelona ATP 500 SF Clay David Ferrer #13 2-6 6-2 7-6(5) Fernando Gonzalez #14 Match data
Aug 20, 2006* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Fernando Gonzalez #13 6-2 6-4 David Ferrer #16 Match data
Jul 2, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass David Ferrer #19 4-6 2-6 6-2 6-3 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #11 Match data
Oct 4, 2003* Metz ATP 250 QF Hard Fernando Gonzalez #26 7-5 6-2 David Ferrer #82 Match data
Apr 10, 2003* Estoril ATP 250 R32 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #23 6-2 4-6 6-4 David Ferrer #54 Match data
Jan 10, 2003* Auckland ATP 250 R16 Hard David Ferrer #58 6-4 6-3 Fernando Gonzalez #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez David Ferrer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20
32 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21
33 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26
34 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26
35 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27
36 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27
37 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27