H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Evgeny Korolev H2H: 3-1

Fernando Gonzalez holds a 3–1 lead over Evgeny Korolev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fernando Gonzalez leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2010 Australian Open third round 6-7(5) 6-3 1-6 6-3 6-4.

CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
KAZ Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 24, 2010* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #11 6-7(5) 6-3 1-6 6-3 6-4 Evgeny Korolev #53 Match data
May 8, 2008* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #11 6-3 6-2 Evgeny Korolev #98 Match data
Mar 7, 2008* Las Vegas ATP 250 R16 Hard Evgeny Korolev #100 6-3 7-6(4) Fernando Gonzalez #13 Match data
Jan 17, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #9 6-7(4) 7-6(6) 6-3 6-2 Evgeny Korolev #87 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Evgeny Korolev #1,762 #46 1,012 1,791 72 91 44.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Evgeny Korolev
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 2006 8–8 50.0% #103 1,612 0 0
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 2007 20–24 45.5% #80 1,680 0 0
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 2008 13–17 43.3% #106 1,677 0 0
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 2009 17–17 50.0% #53 1,728 0 0
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2010 12–20 37.5% #140 1,665 0 0
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2012 1–3 25.0% #211 1,624 0 0
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2013 1–2 33.3% #329 1,596 0 0
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11