H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 3-1

Fernando Gonzalez holds a 3–1 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fernando Gonzalez leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Feliciano Lopez won the 2011 Belgrade fourth round 6-4 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 29, 2011* Belgrade ATP 250 R16 Clay Feliciano Lopez #37 6-4 7-6(4) Fernando Gonzalez #516 Match data
Apr 20, 2006* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #21 6-7(4) 6-2 7-5 Feliciano Lopez #40 Match data
May 12, 2004* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #14 7-6(4) 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #25 Match data
Jan 9, 2003* Auckland ATP 250 R32 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #17 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 Feliciano Lopez #62 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,013 497 477 51.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Feliciano Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,699 0 0
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,841 0 0
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2004 30–24 55.6% #25 1,833 0 1
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,676 0 1
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,804 0 1
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,829 0 1
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,724 0 1
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,807 0 2
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11 2012 24–26 48.0% #40 1,844 0 2
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,950 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,943 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,890 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,900 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,817 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,824 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,763 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,595 0 7
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 — — — — — — — 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7