H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 3-3

Fernando Gonzalez and Fernando Verdasco are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Fernando Gonzalez leads 2–1 on clay, while Fernando Verdasco leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2009 Kuala Lumpur semifinal 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 3, 2009* Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 SF Hard Fernando Verdasco #9 6-4 7-5 Fernando Gonzalez #12 Match data
Apr 25, 2009* Barcelona ATP 500 QF Clay Fernando Gonzalez #14 6-3 4-6 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #7 Match data
May 20, 2006* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Fernando Verdasco #34 3-6 6-2 6-3 Fernando Gonzalez #8 Match data
Oct 20, 2005* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #19 6-3 1-6 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #39 Match data
Aug 26, 2005* New Haven ATP 250 R16 Hard Fernando Verdasco #48 6-7(3) 7-5 7-6(3) Fernando Gonzalez #22 Match data
Apr 13, 2005* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #26 6-4 7-5 Fernando Verdasco #45 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 — — — — — — — 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7