H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Fernando Gonzalez vs Gilles Muller H2H: 1-0
Fernando Gonzalez holds a 1–0 lead over Gilles Muller in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Gonzalez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2006 Los Angeles third round 7-6(5) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
LUX
Age 43
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2006* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Fernando Gonzalez | 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | Gilles Muller | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Gonzalez | #569 | #5 | 3,285 | 2,088 | 330 | 192 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| Gilles Muller | #966 | #21 | 1,930 | 2,071 | 200 | 199 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Gonzalez | Gilles Muller | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #412 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #18 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #69 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #23 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #11 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #95 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #248 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #15 | 1,863 | 0 | 10 | 2010 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #11 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2011 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #54 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #68 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 | 2012 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,834 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #298 | 1,808 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #368 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #509 | 1,780 | 0 | 11 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #47 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #34 | 1,956 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #25 | 1,939 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #138 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |