H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Fernando Gonzalez vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 2-0
Fernando Gonzalez holds a 2–0 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fernando Gonzalez leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2008 Australian Open second round 4-6 6-3 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2008* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Fernando Gonzalez | 4-6 6-3 6-2 6-4 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
| Sep 15, 2007* | Beijing | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Fernando Gonzalez | 7-5 6-7(5) 6-4 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Gonzalez | #569 | #5 | 3,285 | 2,088 | 330 | 192 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Fernando Gonzalez | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #412 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #18 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #23 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #11 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #15 | 1,863 | 0 | 10 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #11 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #68 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #298 | 1,808 | 0 | 11 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #509 | 1,780 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |