H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Igor Andreev H2H: 3-2

Fernando Gonzalez holds a 3–2 lead over Igor Andreev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Igor Andreev leads 2–1 on clay, while Fernando Gonzalez leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Igor Andreev won the 2012 Sao Paulo third round 6-2 6-3.

CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 16, 2012* Sao Paulo ATP 250 R32 Clay Igor Andreev #121 6-2 6-3 Fernando Gonzalez #266 Match data
Apr 18, 2007* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Igor Andreev #235 6-2 2-6 6-3 Fernando Gonzalez #5 Match data
Jan 21, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #16 7-5 6-2 6-3 Igor Andreev #52 Match data
Jul 17, 2004* Amersfoort ATP 250 QF Clay Fernando Gonzalez #21 6-3 7-5 Igor Andreev #48 Match data
Jun 25, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Fernando Gonzalez #26 7-5 6-3 5-7 6-7(4) 6-3 Igor Andreev #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Igor Andreev #1,011 #18 2,490 1,913 219 214 50.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Igor Andreev
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 2003 4–4 50.0% #88 1,565 0 0
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 2004 25–26 49.0% #50 1,660 0 0
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 2005 37–29 56.1% #26 1,832 0 3
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2006 13–13 50.0% #91 1,760 0 3
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2007 31–26 54.4% #33 1,769 0 3
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2008 38–27 58.5% #19 1,882 0 3
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2009 27–30 47.4% #35 1,693 0 3
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2010 17–19 47.2% #79 1,700 0 3
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2011 15–24 38.5% #115 1,688 0 3
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2012 12–15 44.4% #110 1,684 0 3
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2013 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,587 0 3
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11