H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Ivan Ljubicic H2H: 4-3

Fernando Gonzalez holds a 4–3 lead over Ivan Ljubicic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while Fernando Gonzalez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2007 Beijing semifinal 2-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Ivan Ljubicic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 15, 2007* Beijing ATP 500 SF Hard Fernando Gonzalez #7 2-6 6-3 6-4 Ivan Ljubicic #12 Match data
Oct 15, 2006* Vienna ATP 250 F Hard Ivan Ljubicic #3 6-3 6-4 7-5 Fernando Gonzalez #10 Match data
Aug 12, 2006* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #16 6-4 6-7(4) 7-6(3) Ivan Ljubicic #4 Match data
Apr 23, 2006* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Fernando Gonzalez #21 7-5 6-1 Ivan Ljubicic #5 Match data
Oct 23, 2005* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Ivan Ljubicic #12 4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #19 Match data
Oct 15, 2005* Vienna ATP 250 QF Hard Ivan Ljubicic #13 6-3 7-5 Fernando Gonzalez #20 Match data
Aug 18, 1999* Washington ATP 250 R64 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #449 1-6 6-3 6-4 Ivan Ljubicic #100 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Ivan Ljubicic #53 #3 3,315 2,052 400 282 58.7% 0 1 0 0 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Ivan Ljubicic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1996 1–1 50.0% #576 1,509 0 0
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 1997 1–4 20.0% #289 1,489 0 0
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #293 1,482 0 0
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 1999 11–12 47.8% #77 1,587 0 0
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 2000 19–21 47.5% #91 1,654 0 0
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2001 27–21 56.2% #37 1,824 0 1
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2002 27–27 50.0% #49 1,741 0 1
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2003 27–23 54.0% #42 1,791 0 1
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2004 33–22 60.0% #22 1,809 0 1
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2005 50–23 68.5% #9 1,951 0 3
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2006 55–19 74.3% #5 1,944 0 6
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2007 43–22 66.2% #18 1,807 0 8
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2008 20–19 51.3% #44 1,724 0 8
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11 2009 32–23 58.2% #24 1,894 0 9
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11 2010 26–19 57.8% #17 1,884 0 10
32 — — — — — — — 2011 25–19 56.8% #30 1,909 0 10
33 — — — — — — — 2012 3–6 33.3% #53 1,794 0 10